Systematic Analysis of Palatal Rugae Pattern for Use in Human Identification between Two Different Populations
Abstract
Background: Forensic odontology plays important role in identification of human remains in mass disasters such as air crash, tsunami, and accidents. Palatal rugae act as an ideal requisite for human identification as they are present in all victims and are resistant to changes such as aging and trauma. The study aimed to analyze differences in shape and number of palatal rugae in population from Andhra Pradesh and Telangana states.
Methods: This study was conducted in SIBAR institute of Dental Sciences, Guntur, India in 2012 on 200 subjects, gender matched and equally divided as 100 from Andhra Pradesh and 100 from Telangana states. Rugae were studied using Kapali.S classification. Association between rugae shape and gender variation between the two populations were tested by chi-square analysis and student t-test.
Results: Average number of rugae was more (11.84±3.03) in subjects of Andhra Pradesh, compared to Telangana (9.50 ±1.65) population. Males of Andhra Pradesh showed significantly higher mean number of total rugae than in Telangana males. Distribution of total number of different rugae shapes in males and females of both the populations showed significant variation in wavy and circular rugae patterns. Wavy, curved and straight rugae were significantly higher in males and females of Andhra Pradesh compared to Telangana population. Telangana population showed significant increase in circular rugae.
Conclusion: Our study revealed statistically significant variation in shape and total number of rugae between observed populations of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana states.
Ranganathan K, Rooban T, Lakshminarayanan V (2008). Forensic odontology: A review. J Forensic Odontol, 1: 4–12.
Nayak P, Acharya AB, Padmini AT, Kaveri H (2007). Differences in the palatal rugae shapes in two populations of India. Arch Oral Biol, 52: 977- 82.
Whittaker DK (1994). An introduction to forensic dentistry. Quintessence Int; 25: 723-30.
Segelinck SL, Goldstein L (2005). Forensic application of palatal rugae in dental identification. The Forensic Examiner, 14(1), 44-47.
English WR, Ribison SF, Summit JB, Oesterle LJ, Brannon RB, Morlang WM (1988). Individuality of human palatal rugae. J Forensic Sci, 33:718-26.
The Academy of Prosthodontics (2005). The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. 8th ed: CV Mosby.
Datta AK (2007). Essential of Human embryology. 4th ed Calcutta: Current books international.
Gray H. Gray’s anatomy (2008). 40th ed. Spain: Churchill Living stone.
Lysell L (1955). Plica palatinae transversae and papilla incisive in man; a morphological and genetic study. Acta Odontol Scand, 13(Suppl. 18):5-137.
Kapali S, Townsend G, Richards L, Parish T (1997). Palatal rugea in Australian aborigenes and Caucasians. Aust Dent J, 42: 129-33.
Hemanth M, Vidya M, Shetty N, Karkera BV (2010). Identification of individuals using palatal rugae: Computerized method. J Forensic Dent Sci, 2: 86-90.
Abou EF, Mona M, Gamal ZHES (1998). A study of palatal rugae pattern (rugoscopy) in an Egyptian population. Egy Dent J, 44: 3177-84.
Fahmi FM, Al-Shamrani SM, Talic YF (2001). Rugae pattern in a Saudi population sample of males and Females. Saudi Dent J,13: 92-5.
Bharath ST, Kumar GR, Dhanapal R, Saraswathi T (2011). Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of palatal rugae from a population of Coastal Andhra. J Forensic Dent Sci, 3: 58-62.
Gondivkar SM, Patel S, Gadbail AR et al (2011). Morphological study of the palatal rugae in western Indian population. J Forensic Leg Med, 18: 310-2.
Kumar S, Vezhavendhan N, Shanthi V, Balaji N, Sumathi MK, Vendhan P (2012). Palatal rugoscopy among Puducherry population. J Contemp Dent Pract, 13: 401-4.
Files | ||
Issue | Vol 46 No 5 (2017) | |
Section | Original Article(s) | |
Keywords | ||
Forensic dentistry Palatal rugae Rugoscopy Human identification |
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |