The Influential Factor Analysis of Classification Partition Management Mode on the Emergency Triage
Abstract
Background: The aim of the study was to discuss on the influential factors of the mode of classification of partition management in the emergency triage.
Method: Retrospectively analyzing the effects of emergency triage of 156 cases who adopted the classification partition management mode during Oct 2014 to Oct 2015 in Xuzhou Central Hospital (Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, China). They were divided into triage success group of 108 cases and triage failure group of 48 cases. Comparing the single factor analysis and multi-factor analysis, and selecting possible influential factors.
Result: According to the single factor analysis, for the patients who came to the doctor in the daytime and working days, the higher education degree and compliance they had, the faster the back-show time of emergency inspect and check came back, the more comprehensive the body examination and disease history taking were done, the simpler the disease condition was, the higher triage success rate they received. Compared to the emergency observation time between two groups, the difference was not statistically significant. According to the multi-factor analysis, the emergency check and examination back-show time, the comprehensive degree of body examination and disease history taking and the complexity degree of disease could be the independent risk factors for triage success.
Conclusion: Simplify the examination procedure, improve the efficiency of back-show and acquire detail disease information are important methods for the improvement of triage success.
Ramos JG, Perondi B, Dias RD, Miranda LC, Co¬hen C, Carvalho CR, Velasco IT, Forte DN (2016). Development of an al-gorithm to aid triage decisions for inten-sive care unit ad¬mis¬sion: a clinical vignette and retrospective co¬hort study. Crit Care, 20:81.
Twomey M, Wallis LA, Myers JE (2007). Limita¬tions in validating emergency de-partment tri¬age scales. Emerg Med J, 24:477–479.
Streiner DL, Norman GR (2006). “Preci-sion” and “accuracy”: two terms that are neither. J Clin Epidemiol, 59:327–330.
Shum HP, Chan KC, Lau CW, Leung AK, Chan KW, Yan WW (2010). Triage deci-sions and out¬comes for patients with Triage Priority 3 on the Society of Critical Care Medicine scale. Crit Care Re-susc, 12:42–49.
Parenti N, Reggiani ML, Iannone P, Percu-dani D, Dowding D (2014). A systematic review on the validity and reliability of an emergency de¬partment triage scale, the Manchester Tri¬age System. Int J Nurs Stud, 51:1062–1069.
Christ M, Grossmann F, Winter D, Bingisser R, Platz E (2010). Modern triage in the emer¬gency department. Dtsch Arz-tebl Int, 107:892–898.
Farrohknia N, Castren M, Ehrenberg A, Lind L, Oredsson S, Jonsson H (2011). Emergency de¬partment triage scales and their compo¬nents: a systematic review of the scientific evi¬dence. Scand J Trauma Re-susc Emerg Med, 19:42.
Piers RD, Azoulay E, Ricou B, Dekeyser Ganz F, Decruyenaere J, Max A (2011). Perceptions of appropriateness of care among European and Israeli intensive care unit nurses and physi¬cians. JA-MA, 306:2694–2703.
Graff I, Goldschmidt B, Glien P, Bog-danow M, Fimmers R, Hoeft A (2014). The German ver¬sion of the Manchester Triage System and its quality criteria – first assessment of validity and reliabil-ity. PLoS One, 9:e88995.
Mirhaghi A, Heydari A, Mazlom R, Ebrahi-mi M (2015). The reliability of the Cana-dian Triage and Acuity Scale: meta-analysis. N Am J Med Sci, 7:299–305.
Escher M, Perneger TV, Chevrolet JC (2004). Na¬tional questionnaire survey on what influ¬ences doctors’ decisions about admission to inten¬sive care. BMJ, 329:425.
Ebrahimi M, Heydari A, Mazlom R, Mir-haghi A (2015). The reliability of the Aus-tralasian Tri¬age Scale: a meta-analysis. World J Emerg Med, 6:94–99.
Reith FC, Van den Brande R, Synnot A, Gruen R, Maas AI (2016). The reliability of the Glasgow Coma Scale: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med, 42:3–15.
Riley R, Holman C, Fletcher D (2014). Inter-rater reliability of the ASA physical status classifica¬tion in a sample of anaesthetists in Western Australia. Anaesth Intensive Care, 42:614–618.
Gomersall CD, Joynt GM (2011). What is the benefit in triage? Crit Care Med, 39:911–912.
Mohan D, Angus DC, Ricketts D, Farris C, Fisch¬hoff B, Rosengart MR (2014). As-sessing the validity of using serious game technology to analyze physician decision making. PLoS One, 9:e105445.
van der Wulp I, van Baar ME, Schrijvers AJ (2008). Reliability and validity of the Man-ches¬ter Triage System in a general emer-gency de¬partment patient population in the Nether¬lands: results of a simulation study. Emerg Med J, 25:431–434.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 45 No 7 (2016) | |
| Section | Original Article(s) | |
| Keywords | ||
| Classification partition management mode Emergency triage Independent risk factor | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
