Barriers to Effective Formulation of Code of Ethics in a Medical University
,
Abstract
Background: Every year many organizations formulate a Code of Ethics (COE) but when it comes to implementing, it does not achieve the desired purposes. Ineffectiveness of COEs can stem from different factors and surely, one of them is bad formulation. This research was conducted to identify the barriers to effective formulation of COEs in one of the main state universities of medical sciences in Iran.
Methods: A qualitative approach using thematic analysis in three stages of descriptive coding, interpretative coding and overarching themes was adopted to analyze data collected through 27 semi-structured interviews. This study was conducted in 2014-15 at Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Results: Totally 135 descriptive themes, 12 interpretive themes and 3 overarching themes emerged through analyzing interviews.
Conclusion: In order to have an implementable COE, 12 barriers in three categories including “goal-setting”, “approach” and “content” of the COE, must be removed. In “goal-setting”, real cultural conditions of the medical university must be considered. Moreover, the COE must be in response to perceived internal needs and its philosophy must be clear for all members of the university. Besides, the formulation “approach” of the COEs must be specialist, participatory and expertised. Finally, in “content”, different stakeholders with diverse values, levels of knowledge and needs should be carefully addressed. In addition, it is proposed to emphasize religious and humane values to encourage participation of people. as a final point, the university should avoid imitation in the content of the COE, and conceptualize the values in motivating, inspirational and guiding words.
Bagheri A (2003). A Brief History of Medical Eth¬ics in Iran. Lifestudies.org, (Special Re-port No.3), Available from: www.lifestudies.org
Rad F (2015). The first Iranian ethical code in med¬i¬cine. Khandani, 36(84): 36.
Stevens B (2008). Corporate ethical codes: Effec¬tive instruments for influencing be-havior. J Bus Ethics, (78): 601-609.
Remišová A, Lašáková A (2011). On the risks of im¬plementation of codes of ethics in academic en¬vironment. Societal Studies, 4(1): 61-74.
Nijhof A, Cludts S, Fisscher O, Laan A (2003). Meas¬uring the implementation of codes of con¬duct. An assessment method based on a pro¬cess approach of the re-sponsible organisa¬tion. J Bus Ethics, 45(1-2): 65-78.
Spielthenner G (2015). Why comply with a code of ethics? Med Healthc Philos, (18): 195-202.
Messikomer CM, Cirka CC (2010). Con-structing a code of ethics: An experiential case of a na¬tional professional organiza-tion. J Bus Ethics, 95(1): 55-71.
Yildiz ML, Gulnur EI, Ahmet E (2013). Per-ceived academic code of ethics: a research on Turkish academics. Procedia - Social and Behav¬ioral Sciences, 99: 282-293.
Saunders M, Lewis P, Thornhill A (2009). Re-search methods for business students. 5th ed. Pear-son Edu¬ca¬tion Limited, Italy, p.: 108.
International Relations Office of SBUMS (2015). History and vision of SBUMS. Available from: http://en.sbmu.ac.ir/
Teddlie C, Yu F (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. J Mix Method Res, 1(1): 77-100.
O’Reilly M, Parker N (2012). ‘Unsatisfactory Satu¬ra¬tion’: a critical exploration of the no-tion of satu¬rated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qual Res, 13(2): 190-197.
Matos M, Conde R, Gonçalves R, Santos A (2015). Multiple victimization and social exclu¬sion: A grounded analysis of the life stories of women. J Humanist Psychol, 55(2): 223-224.
Mills AJ, Durepos G, Wiebe E (Eds.) (2010). Ency¬clo¬pedia of case study research. Sage, United States, pp.: 925-926.
King N, Horrocks C (2010). Interviews in quali-tative re¬search. Sage, England, pp.: 152-158.
Freeman M, deMarrais K, Preissle J, Roulston K, St. Pierre EA (2007). Standards of evi-dence in qualitative research: An incitement to dis¬course. Edu Res, 36(1): 25-32.
Sinkovics RR, Penz E, Ghauri PN (2008). Enhanc¬ing the trustworthiness of qualita-tive re¬search in international business. MIR, 48(6): 689-714.
Maxwell JA (1992). Understanding and validi-ty in qualitative research. Harvard Educ Rev, 62(3): 279-300.
Seale C (1999). The quality of qualitative research. Sage, England, p.: 148.
Silverman D (2010). Doing qualitative research, a prac¬ti¬cal handbook. 3rd ed. Sage, England, pp.: 435-436.
Neuman WL (2007). Basics of social research qual-ita¬tive and quantitative approaches. 2nd ed. Allyn & Ba¬con, United States, p.: 295.
Eisenhardt KM (1989). Building theories from case study research. Acad Manage Rev, 14(4): 532-550.
Alvani SM, Hassanpoor A, Davari A (2011). Ana¬lyz¬ing the organizational ethics of em-ployees us¬ing the moral compass mode. Ethics Sci Tech, 5(3-4): 25-34.
Khaki Gh (2013). Management of professional ethics in or¬ganization by means of chivalrous method. Fojan, Iran, p.: 216.
Asef Think Tank. National code of profes-sional eth¬ics. [Research project]. Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution, Iran; 2013.
Gilley KM, Robertson CJ, Mazur TC (2010). The bottom-line benefits of ethics code commit¬ment. Bus Horizons, 53(1): 31-37.
Zakaria M, Garanca Z, Sobeih A (2012). Cul-tural and legal challenges in implementing code of con¬duct in supply chain manage-ment of mo¬bile phone industries: Sony Ericsson case study. Soc Resp J, 8(2): 227-241.
Aref H. Designing a Model for The imple-menta¬tion of codes of ethics in organiza-tion- Case study: MAPNA group [MS the-sis]. Faculty of management, University of Tehran, Iran; 2013.
Mokhtarianpour M (2008). Review on per-ceptive bar¬riers of justice actualization in institution: a logical analysis. Bardasht Dovom, 5(8): 163-199.
Kaptein M, Dalen JV (2000). The empirical assess¬ment of corporate ethics: A case study. J Bus Ethics, 24(2): 95-114.
Gharamaki AF, Nocheh-Falah R (2007). Bar-riers of professional ethics development in organiza-tions. Boshra cultural institute for religious studies, Iran, pp.: 150-161.
Rezaeimanesh B. Study of ethical infrastruc-ture in Iran’s public service sector [PhD thesis]. Fac¬ulty of management and ac-counting, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Iran; 2004.
Ki EJ, Kim SY (2010). Ethics statements of pub¬lic relations firms: What do they say? J Bus Eth¬ics, 91(2): 223-236.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 45 No 1 (2016) | |
| Section | Original Article(s) | |
| Keywords | ||
| Code of Ethics (COE) Formulation Barriers Formulation barriers Thematic analysis | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
