Original Article

The Roles of the Coach and Athletic Identify in Mitigating Burnout: Evidence from Korean Male Wrestlers

Abstract

Background: In elite Korean wrestling, a sport marked by cultural hierarchy and limited athlete participation, the coach–athlete relationship plays a critical role in shaping an athlete’s development and wellbeing. However, the psychological mechanisms linking the coach–athlete relationship to burnout remain underexplored. This study investigated the mediating role of athletic identity in the relationship between the coach–athlete relationship and athlete burnout among Korean male wrestlers.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey with 369 officially registered Korean male wrestlers (20.37±4.01 years old) from high school, collegiate, and professional levels from whole Republic of Korea via online survey using Google Forms. Participants completed validated measures of the coach–athlete relationship, athletic identity, and athlete burnout. Structural equation modeling with bootstrapping procedures was used to assess direct and indirect effects.
Results: The coach–athlete relationship significantly predicted athletic identity (β=0.705, P<0.001) but did not directly affect athlete burnout (β=–0.101, P=0.212). Athletic identity negatively predicted burnout (β=–0.635, P<0.001) and fully mediated the relationship between the coach–athlete relationship and burnout (indirect effect: β=–0.448, P=0.010). These results suggest that athletic identity serves as a protective psychological factor, mitigating burnout even when relational quality is high.
Conclusion: While a positive coach–athlete relationship alone does not directly reduce burnout; it exerts an indirect protective effect by enhancing athletic identity. Strengthening athletic identity through supportive coaching may be key to reducing psychological exhaustion among male wrestlers in culturally hierarchical sports environments.

1. Korean Wrestling Federation (2021). United World Wrestling. Available at: http://www.kor-wres-tling.or.kr/pages/about/introduction/federation/index.asp (Accessed: 28 Febru-ary 2025).
2. Korean Wrestling Federation (2024). Team/Athlete, Hall of Fame. Available at: http://www.kor-wrestling.or.kr/pages/player-team/HoF/index.asp (Accessed: 28 Feb-ruary 2025).
3. Korean Sport & Olympic Committee Sports Support Portal (2024). Registration status. Available at: https://g1.sports.or.kr/stat/stat01.do (Accessed: 28 February 2025).
4. Kim SK, Choi H (2024). Effects of coaches’ autonomy support on athletes’ aggres-sive behavior and athlete burnout: Veri-fication of the mediating effects of coach-athlete relationship and team ef-ficacy. Front Psychol, 15:1388185.
5. Gustafsson H, DeFreese JD, Madigan DJ (2017). Athlete burnout: Review and rec-ommendations. Curr Opin Psychol, 16:109–113.
6. Isoard-Gautheur S, Guillet-Descas E, Le-myre PN (2012). A prospective study of the influence of perceived coaching style on burnout propensity in high level young athletes: Using a self-determination theory perspective. Sport Psych, 26:282–298.
7. Jeon SM (2025). A study on the practical framework of nudge communication: Proposing and applying the CaSE framework for strategic communication. Locality and Globality, 49(2):63–107.
8. Brewer BW, Van Raalte JL, Linder DE (1993). Athletic identity: Hercules’ mus-cles or Achilles’ heel? Int J Sport Psychol, 24(2):237–254.
9. Gerber M, Gustafsson H, Seelig H, et al. (2018). Usefulness of the Athlete Burnout Questionnaire (ABQ) as a screening tool for the detection of clinically relevant burnout symptoms among young elite athletes. Psychol Sport Exerc, 39:104–113.
10. Küttel A, Larsen CH (2020). Risk and pro-tective factors for mental health in elite athletes: A scoping review. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol, 13(1):231–265.
11. Jowett S, Ntoumanis N (2004). The coach–athlete relationship questionnaire (CART‐Q): Development and initial val-idation. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 14(4):245–257.
12. Kim KH, Park JG (2009). Examining the structural model of perceived autonomy support, basic needs, and motivational orientations among collegiate athletes. Korean J Sport Psychol, 20(3):33–48.
13. Martin JJ, Eklund RC, Mushett CA (1997). Factor structure of the athletic identity measurement scale with athletes with disabilities. Adapt Phys Activ Q, 14(1):74–82.
14. Kang HM (2012). The effects of athletic identity on athletes' self-efficacy and coping effectiveness among student-athletes. Korean J Phys Educ, 51(5):155–167.
15. Raedeke TD, Smith AL (2001). Develop-ment and preliminary validation of an athlete burnout measure. J Sport Exerc Psychol, 23(4):281–306.
16. Choi HH, Cho SK, Eklund RC (2017). A comparative study of construct equiva-lence and latent means analysis of ath-lete burnout questionnaire for adoles-cent athletes. Korean J Wellness, 12(3):433–445.
17. Hu LT, Bentler PM (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling, 6(1):1–55.
18. George D, Mallery P (2019). IBM SPSS Sta-tistics 26 Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference (16th ed.). Routledge, New York, USA.
19. Kline RB (2023). Principles and practice of struc-tural equation modeling. 5th ed. The Guil-ford Press, New York, USA.
20. Kim M, Kim Y, Won D (2018). From commanding to serving athletes: Nurtur-ing the coach–athlete relationship. Int J Sports Sci Coach, 13(6):891–901.
21. Lee S, Kwon S, Jang D, et al (2023). The ef-fect of coach–athlete fit on the coach–athlete relationship in team sport: Role of trust in coach. Int J Sports Sci Coach, 18(4):986–993.
22. Hagerty S, Felizzi M (2023). The impact of authoritarian coaching styles on athletes’ anxious states. Sport Soc Work. 3(1):67–76.
23. Dacus L, Castagno C, Castagno C, et al (2023). Impact of traumatic sports injury on an athlete’s psychological wellbeing, adherence to sport and athletic identity. J Sports Med Ther, 8(3):36–46.
24. Fasczewski KS, Powell SM, Stevens NR, et al (2022). “Strong, fearless, tough, endur-ing”: collegiate male wrestlers’ percep-tions of body image and masculinity. Perform Enhanc Health, 10(1):100212.
Files
IssueVol 54 No 8 (2025) QRcode
SectionOriginal Article(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v54i8.19582
Keywords
Athletic identity Burnout Coach–athlete relationship Mediation effect
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Kim J-Y, Jeon S, Song H-H. The Roles of the Coach and Athletic Identify in Mitigating Burnout: Evidence from Korean Male Wrestlers. Iran J Public Health. 2025;54(8):1731-1741.