The Role of Private Doctor and Private-Public Mix Systems in Tuberculosis Detection in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review
-
Rosita Dwi Yuliandari
,
Chatarina Umbul Wahyuni
,
Fariani Syahrul
,
Hari Basuki Notobroto
,
Mochammad Bagus Qomaruddin
,
Soedarsono .
Abstract
Background: Despite the significant efforts in tuberculosis (TB) management, TB case detection remains a challenge in developing countries. Traditional methods such as Directly Observed Treatment Short-course (DOTS) have often underperformed, necessitating the implementation of the public-private mix (PPM) strategy in recent decades. However, varied PPM models yielded varied results across different countries. Hence, this systematic review assesses the effectiveness of various PPM models and seeks innovative strategies to enhance TB detection.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science up to August 2024. Studies evaluating the efficacy of PPM models on TB case detection in developing countries were pooled. From the initial 731 potential studies, a total of 10 studies were finally included in this systematic review.
Results: The review identified a variety of PPM interventions, including mass campaigns, mobile screening units, home-based tracking, and digital CXR examination. These approaches significantly raised tuberculosis detection rates compared to control groups or previous years. Notably, private sector involvement and novel approaches, such as application-based tracking in Vietnam and mobile vans equipped with digital X-rays in India, yielded favorable results. However, the variation in effectiveness rate underscored the importance of personalized approaches based on local contexts.
Conclusion: PPM models, especially those with innovative techniques, significantly enhance TB case detection. Scaling up and modifying these strategies to various country circumstances is critical to meeting global TB reduction targets.
2. Ayenew B, Belay DM, Gashaw Y, et al (2024). WHO’s end of TB targets: unachievable by 2035 without addressing under nutrition, forced displacement, and homelessness: trend analysis from 2015 to 2022. BMC Public Health, 24:961.
3. Kangovi S, Mukherjee J, Bohmer R, et al (2009). A Classification and Meta-analysis of Community-based Directly Observed Therapy Programs for Tuber-culosis Treatment in Developing Coun-tries. J Community Health, 34:506–13.
4. Ullah W, Wali A, Haq MU, et al (2021). Pub-lic–Private Mix Models of Tuberculosis Care in Pakistan: A High-Burden Coun-try Perspective. Front Public Health, 9:703631.
5. Khan AJ, Khowaja S, Khan FS, et al (2012). Engaging the private sector to increase tuberculosis case detection: an impact evaluation study. Lancet Infect Dis,12:608–16.
6. Sah R, Singh UK, Mainali R, et al (2021). Engaging Private Health Care Providers to Identify Individuals with TB in Ne-pal. Int J Environ Res Public Health,18:11762.
7. Ford D, Datta B, Prakash AK, et al (2019). Fifth year of a public-private partner-ship to improve the case detection of tuberculosis in India: A role model for future action? Indian J Tuberc, 66:480–6.
8. Hamim A, Seddiq MK, Sayedi SM, et al (2023). The contribution of private health facilities to the urban tuberculosis program of Afghanistan. Indian J Tuberc, 70:8–11.
9. Joloba M, Mwangi C, Alexander H, et al (2016). Strengthening the Tuberculosis Specimen Referral Network in Uganda: The Role of Public-Private Partnerships. J Infect Dis, 213 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S41-6.
10. Khatana GH, Haq I, Khan SMS. (2019). Ef-fectiveness, acceptance and feasibility of home-based intervention model for tuberculosis contact tracing in Kashmir. J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis,14:19–25.
11. Do Thu T, Kumar A, Ramaswamy G, et al (2020). An Innovative Public–Private Mix Model for Improving Tuberculosis Care in Vietnam: How Well Are We Doing? Trop Med Infect Dis, 5:26.
12. Wippel C, Farroñay S, Gilbert HN, et al (2024). Exploring the Role of the Private Sector in Tuberculosis Detection and Management in Lima, Peru: A Mixed-Methods Patient Pathway Analysis. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 111:168–75.
13. Kumar MKA, Dewan PK, Nair PKJ, et al (2005). Improved tuberculosis case de-tection through public-private partner-ship and laboratory-based surveillance, Kannur District, Kerala, India, 2001-2002. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 9:870–6.
14. Foo C De, Shrestha P, Wang L, et al (2022). Integrating tuberculosis and noncom-municable diseases care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): A sys-tematic review. PLoS Med,19:e1003899..
15. Musa BM, Iliyasu Z, Yusuf SM, et al (2014). Systematic review and metanalysis on community based interventions in tu-berculosis care in developing countries. Niger J Med, 23(2):103–17.
16. Wells WA, Uplekar M, Pai M. (2015). Achieving Systemic and Scalable Private Sector Engagement in Tuberculosis Care and Prevention in Asia. PLoS Med, 12:e1001842.
17. Thapa P, Jayasuriya R, Hall JJ, et al (2021). Role of informal healthcare providers in tuberculosis care in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic scoping review. PLoS One, 16:e0256795.
18. Ngo DM, Doan NB, Tran SN, et al (2023). Practice regarding tuberculosis care among physicians at private facilities: A cross-sectional study from Vietnam. PLoS One, 18:e0284603.
19. Lestari BW, Hadisoemarto PF, Afifah N, et al (2024). Tuberculosis care provided by private practitioners in an urban setting in Indonesia: Findings from a standard-ized patient study. PLOS Glob Public Health, 4:e0003311.
20. Uplekar M (2003). Involving private health care providers in delivery of TB care: global strategy. Tuberculosis (Edinb), 83(1-3):156-64.
21. Sharma D, Sharma J, Deo N, et al (2018). Prevalence and risk factors of tubercu-losis in developing countries through health care workers. Microb Pathog, 124:279–283.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 54 No 6 (2025) | |
| Section | Review Article(s) | |
| Keywords | ||
| Public-private mix Tuberculosis Developing countries Systematic review | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
