Oncoming Revolution in the Next Generation of Cohort Studies
Abstract
The world is changing rapidly, mainly due to the impact of megatrends that have an impact on the entire human life, particularly in medical sciences. Medical research methodologies such as cohort studies provide very critical information, but it is not clear what would be its destination in the future. In this short article, we have tried to offer a somewhat different perspective on the future of cohort studies by analyzing the texts and their conclusions from the author's viewpoint. According to our assessment, cohorts will play a key role in medical research, but their methodology will significantly change in terms of designing, implementing, analysing, and applying the findings. The new generation of cohort study extracts most of their information from electronic health records, and it is not just restricted to a particular geographic area. With the changes in the levels of occupational exposure, risk factors, and the introduction of Omics, likely, occupational and birth cohorts as well as human diseases will likely undergo fundamental changes in the future. Big data will provide researchers with new opportunities, but information extraction and analysis require a team of specialists from several scientific fields. Furthermore, participants are likely to play a more active role in setting priorities and implementing research findings.
2. Capili B, Anastasi JK (2021). Cohort studies. Am J Nurs, 121(12):45-48.
3. Duan Y, Xu Z, Deng J, Lin Y, et al (2020). A scoping review of cohort studies assessing traditional Chinese medicine interventions. BMC Complement Med Ther, 20:361.
4. Hosseini A, Jackson AC, Bahramnezhad F (2022). Ethical Considerations in Interventional Studies: A Systematic Review Ethics and Interventional Study. Acta Med Iran, 60(10):609-614.
5. Saldanha IJ, Adam GP, Bañez LL, et al (2022). Inclusion of nonrandomized studies of interventions in systematic reviews of interventions: updated guidance from the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality Effective Health Care program. J Clin Epidemiol, 152:300-306.
6. Narayanan K, Bakshi A (2021). History and future of digital health. Itihaasa Research and Digital. https://itihaasa.com/public/pdf/History_and_Future_of_Digital_Health_in_the_World_and_India.pdf?v=1.1
7. WHO (2018). Ageing and health. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health.
8. Butcher CJ, Hussain W (2022). Digital healthcare: the future. Future Healthc J, 9 (2):113-117.
9. Christian J, Dasgupta N, Jordan M, et al (2018). Digital health and patient registries: today, tomorrow, and the future. In: 21st Century Patient Registries: Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide: 3rd Edition, Addendum. Ed(s): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US).
10. Wahlrab A (2020). Global studies. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. Ed(s): Oxford University Press London, pp. 1-29.
11. Gajarawala SN, Pelkowski JN (2021). Telehealth benefits and barriers. J Nurse Pract, 17 (2):218-221.
12. Farhud DD, Zokaei S (2021). Ethical issues of artificial intelligence in medicine and healthcare. Iran J Public Health, 50(11):i-v.
13. Uddin M, Syed-Abdul S (2020). Data analytics and applications of the wearable sensors in healthcare: an overview. Sensors, 20 (5):1379.
14. Borak J, Brosseau LM (2015). The past and future of occupational exposure limits. J Occup Environ Hyg, 12 Suppl 1(sup1):S1-3.
15. Aizat WM, Ismail I, Noor NM (2018). Recent development in omics studies. Adv Exp Med Biol, 1102:1-9.
16. Canova C, Cantarutti A (2020). Population-based birth cohort studies in epidemiology. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 17(15):5276.
17. Samet JM, Woodward A (2019). On being an epidemiologist. Am J Epidemiol, 188 (5):818-824.
18. Balwan WK, Kour S (2021). Lifestyle Diseases: The Link between Modern Lifestyle and threat to public health. Saudi J Med Pharm Sci, 7 (4):179-84.
19. King DE, Xiang J, Pilkerton CS (2018). Multimorbidity trends in United States adults, 1988–2014. J Am Board Fam Med, 31 (4):503-513.
20. Mooney SJ, Pejaver V (2018). Big data in public health: terminology, machine learning, and privacy. Annu Rev Public Health, 39:95-112.
21. Qi S, Hua F, Xu S, Zhou Z, Liu F (2021). Trends of global health literacy research (1995–2020): Analysis of mapping knowledge domains based on citation data mining. PLoS One, 16 (8):e0254988.
22. Cuschieri S (2019). The STROBE guidelines. Saudi J Anaesth, 13 (Suppl 1):S31-S34.
Files | ||
Issue | Vol 53 No 11 (2024) | |
Section | Original Article(s) | |
Keywords | ||
Cohort studies Forecasting Next generation |
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |