Impact of CrossFit Training Programs on the Physical Health and Sociogenic Somatic Anxiety of Adolescents
,
Abstract
Background: A decline in adolescent health holds significant repercussions for public health. Promoting exercise is essential to improve physical and mental health among youth. This study aimed to explore the effect of CrossFit training programs on the physical health and sociogenic somatic anxiety of adolescents.
Methods: In March 2023, 100 adolescents were openly recruited from eight middle schools in Jinhua, China. The participants, were divided equally into control and experimental groups, experienced either traditional or CrossFit training, respectively, over nine weeks. Evaluation measures included the analysis of social physique anxiety, body esteem, physical self-efficacy, and general physical health before and after the exercise program.
Results: Post-intervention data demonstrated marked reductions across all facets of the social physique anxiety scale, including worries about public scrutiny, anxiety from social comparison, and discomfort related to one’s physical self-image, more so in the experimental group (P<0.05). Likewise, assessments of the physical self-perception profile and physical self-efficacy scale were enhanced, again with the experimental cohort displaying more pronounced improvements (P<0.05). Results from biophysical function evaluations indicated significant health improvements post-intervention, with noted advancements in lung capacity, aerobic fitness by the standing long jump, and muscular endurance as assessed by grip strength, sit-up, and push-up counts, primarily in the experimental group (P<0.05).
Conclusion: CrossFit training offered considerable advantages by reducing social physique anxiety and enhancing adolescents’ body esteem and physical self-efficacy. The program stimulated improvements in body composition, cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, and flexibility.
2. Alwardat M, Alwardat N (2019). Comment on: Effects of interventions with a phys-ical activity component on bone health in obese children and adolescents: a sys-tematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Miner Metab, 37(2):376-77.
3. Meng F, Han M, Jin Y, Yu Z (2020). Feasi-bility study of CrossFit training system in military academy training. Contemp Sports Technol, 10(4): 22-3.
4. Chang Z (2020). Empowering college phys-ical education courses with CrossFit un-der the HIFT mode. Guizhou Sports Sci Technol, (2):27-36.
5. De Araújo MP, Brito LGO, Rossi F, Garbi-ere ML, Vilela ME, Bittencourt VF (2020). Prevalence of female urinary in-continence in Crossfit practitioners and associated factors: an internet popula-tion-based survey. Urogynecology, 26(2):97-100.
6. Kephart WC, Pledge CD, Roberson PA, et al (2018). The three-month effects of a ketogenic diet on body composition, blood parameters, and performance metrics in CrossFit trainees: a pilot study. Sports (Basel), 6(1):1.
7. Whiteman-Sandland J, Hawkins J, Clayton D (2018). The role of social capital and community belongingness for exercise adherence: An exploratory study of the CrossFit gym model. J Health Psychol, 23(12): 1545-56.
8. Xu X (2008). Construction and validation of the conceptual model of social phy-sique anxiety. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol, 6(2):248-73.
9. Xu X, Yao J (2001). Revision and validation of the Body Esteem Scale for college students. China Sports Sci, 2:78-81.
10. Sun Y, Liu Y, Wu X (2005). Preliminary re-vision of the College Students’ “Body Self-Efficacy Scale”: Discrepancies in self-efficacy practice measurement op-erations. China Sports Sci, 3: 81-4.
11. He J (2018). A study on social physique anx-iety and exercise behavior of women of different ages. J Guangzhou Sport Univ, 38(2):101-4.
12. Dogru Y (2020). The effect of 8-week Crossfit training on social physical anx-iety levels. Afr Educ Res J, 8:157-60.
13. Türkçapar Ü, Yasul Y (2021). An investiga-tion of the social physical anxiety levels of individuals in university education. Gazi Üniv Sport Sci D, 6(2):209-21.
14. Coyne P, Woodruff SJ (2020). The impact of the CrossFit environment on wom-en’s body image, self-esteem, and eating behaviors. Int J Mult Res App, 12(1):78-95.
15. Altmann T, Roth M (2018). The Self-esteem Stability Scale (SESS) for cross-sectional direct assessment of self-esteem stabil-ity. Front Psychol, 9:305566.
16. Zecchin-Oliveira AM, Alesse da Costa LAG, Puggina EF (2021). Physiological and psychological tests involving a pro-fessional CrossFit athlete: A case report. Journal of Case Reports, 2(2):128.
17. Ede K, Hill L, Moreno S, Traverzo N, Weise SD, Huckaby T (2019). A compar-ison of functional movement between CrossFit trained, recreationally trained and sedentary individuals. In Int J Exerci Sci, 2(11):105-15.
18. Ferreira IC, Miarka B, Cardoso R, Badaró M, Brito C, AW CB (2020). Interquartile differences in biomechanical parame-ters in CrossFit® athletes during deep squats with submaximal load until fa-tigue. J Sport Med Phys Fit, 60(9):1216-22.
19. Natalia Z, Irina H, Victoria I, Irina S, Mari-anna R (2016). Efficiency of using the teaching technology while developing healthy lifestyle skills in arts students. J Phys Educ Sport, 16:598-603
20. Carbone S, Candela V, Gumina S (2020). High rate of return to Crossfit training after arthroscopic management of rota-tor cuff tear. Orthop J Sports Med, 8(4): 2325967120911039.
21. Kaczorowska A, Noworyta K, Mroczek A, Lepsy E (2020). Effect of the Mobility WOD training program on functional movement patterns related to the risk of injury in CrossFit practitioners. Acta Gymn, 50(1): 55-61.
22. Türker A, Yüksel O (2020). Investigation of the effect of Amrap and classic Crossfit trainings in wrestlers on anerobic pow-er. Int J Appl Exercise Physiol, 9(9):73-81.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 53 No 7 (2024) | |
| Section | Original Article(s) | |
| Keywords | ||
| CrossFit training Adolescent health Physical well-being Social physique anxiety | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
