Review Article

Euthanasia – A Legal or Medical Issue: A Narrative Review

Euthanasia

Abstract

Euthanasia is a highly controversial issue which keeps the scientific community and the general public divided into those in favour and those opposed to this manner of terminating a person’s life. Ethical, medical, legal, religious and other reasons are used both to justify its legalisation and to argue against it. The main question which attracts differing opinions is whether—beside the right to life as the universal and most important right recognised by the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms—there is the right to die, implying that a person could choose how and when to end their life. The author of the paper analyses several issues. In addition to the introduction which considers the right to life in general, and in the light of international documents, the paper deals with the concept of euthanasia and its historical development, as well as the types of euthanasia. This is followed by an overview of the positions of the proponents and the opponents of the legalisation of euthanasia. Finally, the paper discusses the various ways in which euthanasia is regulated in contemporary criminal legislation.

1. Đorđević M (1995).Život kao objekt krivičnopravne zaštite. Sudska praksa, (3): 50-60.
2. Available from: https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
3. Available from: chrome-exten-si-on://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://rm.coe.int/168007952b
4. Available from: chrome-exten-si-on://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://rm.coe.int/1680081563
5. Available from: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights
6. Dimovski D (2010). Eutanazija. Socijalna misao, 17(2): 185-198.
7. Stojanović Z (1998). Prirodno pravo na život i krivično pravo. Jugoslovenska recija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo, (1): 3-19.
8. Kolarić D (2007). Aktivna i pasivna eu-tanazija i pravo na život. Pravni život, (9): 127-143.
9. Babić M (1997). Pravo na život i privilego-vana ubistva. Pravni život, (9): 83-97.
10. Ferri E (1892). L’omicido-suicido. Torino, 296 p.
11. Vuković S (1995). Eutanazija-ubistvo iz milosrđa. Branič, (3): 27-30.
12. Beširević V (2006).Bogovi su pali na teme: o ustavu i bioetici. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, (2): 205-229).
13. Mitrović G (1981). Problem eutanazije u istoriji ljudskog društva. Advokatura, Beograd, (2): 38-48.
14. Jušić A (2002). Eutanazija. Revija za socijalnu politiku, (3-4): 301-309,
15. Emanuel E (1994). Euthanasia. Histori-cal,Ethical and Empiric Perspectives. National Library of Medicine, DOI: 10.1001/archinte.154.17.1890
16. Otlowski M (2000). Voluntary Euthanasia and the Common Law. Oxford Academic. pp:56-126, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298687.003.0003
17. Gazivoda S (2005). Eutanazija. Međunarodna naučna konferencija, Nove tendencije u sa-vremenoj nauci krivičnog prava i naše krivično zakonodavstvo, Zlatibor, str.257-265.
18. Jelačić O, Tolić B (1976). Eutanazija. Naša zakonitost, (2): 45-56.
19. Huxtable R (2007). Euthanazia, ethies and the Law: From conflicts to compromise, London-New York, Routledge, Taylor&Francis Group, pp.1-8.
20. Milenković M (1940). Eutanazija ili ubijanje iz milosrđa, Slavija, Skopje, str.10-59.
21. Kurtović A, Petrić I (2000). Kazneno djelo usmrćenja na zahtjev i eutanazija. Zbor-nik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, (2): 2-15.
22. Marinović S (1996). Pravo na smrt (eutanazija), Kulturno prosvjetna zajednica, Podgorica, str.1-198.
23. Marinović S (1993). Hrišćanstvo protiv eutanazije. Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine, (3): 11-16.
24. Klajn-Tatić V (2005.a). Religiozna gledišta o aktivnoj eutanaziji. Strani pravni život, (3): 171-177.
25. Kolarić D (2006). Lišenje života iz saami-losti. Pravni život, (9): 127-145.
26. Klajn-Tatić V (1998). Aktivna i pasivna eut-anazija. Pravni život, (9): 23-33.
27. Klajn-Tatić V (2005.b). Odnos između ak-tivne direktne i aktivne indirektne euta-nazije. Pravni život, (9): 451-460.
28. Kolarić D (2008). Krivično delo ubistva. Službeni glasnik, Beograd, str. 307-317.
29. Turanjanin V (2012). Moralna neprihvatljivost razlikovanja aktivne i pasivne eutanazije. Pravni život, (9): 509-522.
30. Cvetković Z (1999). Eutanazija. Branič, (1): 16-26.
31. Rachels J (1975). Active and passive euthanasia. N Engl J Med, 292(2): 78-80.
32. Banović B.,Turanjanin V (2014). Euthana-zia:Murder or not:Comparative Ap-proach. Iran J Public Health, 43 (10): 1316-1323.
33. Jušić A (2002). Eutanazija. Revija za socijalnu politiku, 9(3-4): 301-309.
34. Turković K, Roksandić V, Vidlička S, Maršalevski A (2010). Eutanazija i potpomognuto samoubistvo-etičke dileme kriminalne politike. Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu, (1): 225-236.
35. Šantrić J (2004). Pomaganje u samoubistvu kao oblik eutanazije. Pravni život, (9): 177-186.
36. Striković J (1997). Eutanazija, Međunarodna naučna konferencija, Pravo i medicina (dodirne tačke-sporna pitanja), Srpsko udruženje za krivično pravo, Kopaonik, str.1-5.
37. Petrović Z (1997). Ispitivanje javnog mnjenja u vezi sa eutanazijom, Međunarodna naučna konferencija, Pravo i medicina (dodirne tačke-sporna pitanja), Srpsko udruženje za krivično pravo, Kopaonik, str.35-39.
38. Marinović S (1996). Pravo na smrt (eutanazija), Kultrno prosvjetna zajednica, Podgorica, str.1-198.
39. Kambovski V (2003). Kazneno pravo. Poseben del, Pravni fakultet Justinijan Prvi, Skopje, str.45-48.
40. Turanjanin V (2016). Eutanazija i ljekarski potpomognuto samoubistvo pod lupom Evropskog suda za ljudska prava, Međunarodni naučni skup, Krivičnopravni instrumenti suprotstavljanja terorizmu i drugim krivičnim djelima nasilničkog karaktera, Teslić, str.558-576.
41. Turanjanin V, Mihajlović B (2014). Right to Die with Dignity-The Same Problem and Different Legal Approaches i European Legislations, with Special Regard to Serbia. Human Rights between Warand Peace, (2), Olsztyn, pp.53-68.
42. Marc De Hert, Sien Loos, Sigrid Sterckx, et al. (2022). Improving Control over Eu-thanasia of Persons with Psychiatric Ill-ness: Lessons from the First Belgian Criminal Court Case Concerning Eutha-nasia. Front Psychiatry, 13:933748.
Files
IssueVol 54 No 6 (2025) QRcode
SectionReview Article(s)
Keywords
Faculty of Law in Podgorica University of Montenegro Podgorica Montenegro

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Radulović D. Euthanasia – A Legal or Medical Issue: A Narrative Review. Iran J Public Health. 2025;54(6):1153-1159.