Original Article

The Societal Impact of the Papers Published in Blended Learn-ing in Medicine on Social Network Sites: An Altmetrics Study

Abstract

Background: Nowadays, blended learning in medicine (BLM) has gained the attention of most experts as an invaluable approach to improving the quality of medical education. The level of attention to articles in this field on social networks is substantial. This study aimed to study the effectiveness of published articles in blended learning, indexed in Scopus and Web of Science databases between 2013 and 2022, from an altmetrics perspective.
Methods: The research is descriptive-analytical, with a scientometrics approach (using the Altmetrics index). The population includes all the articles on blended learning in medicine, indexed in Scopus and Web of Science databases, two well-known citation databases worldwide. Data were extracted using the Altmetrics bookmarklet tool and analyzed with descriptive statistics methods in Excel software.
Results: Out of 1327 articles, 136 articles (10.25%) did not have a digital object identifier (DOI) or PMID number. Mendeley, X (previously Twitter), and Dimensions were the most widely used social networks in blended learning. The United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia had the highest number of tweets in blended learning in medicine.
Conclusion: The number of articles with altmetrics indicators, categorized by publication year, demonstrates an improvement in the familiarity and use of social media by blended learning researchers in medicine. Blended learning researchers are advised to carefully select reputable journals - preferably with DOI - to increase the visibility and attention to their articles on social media.

1. Yigit T, Koyun A, Yuksel AS, Cankaya IA (2014). Evaluation of blended learning approach in computer engineering edu-cation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Scienc-es, 141:807-12.
2. Hrastinski S (2019). What do we mean by blended learning?. TechTrends, 63 (5): 564-9.
3. Chen LL (2022). Designing Online Discus-sion for HyFlex Learning. Int J Educ Method, 8 (1): 191-8.
4. Talan T, Gulsecen S (2019). The effect of a flipped classroom on students’ achievements, academic engagement, and satisfaction levels. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20 (4): 31-60.
5. McCutcheon K, O’Halloran P, Lohan M (2018). Online learning versus blended learning of clinical supervisee skills with pre-registration nursing students: A ran-domized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud, 82: 30-9.
6. Hasanah H, Malik MN (2020). Blended learning in improving students’ critical thinking and communication skills at University. Cypriot J Educ Sci, 15 (5): 1295-306.
7. Thelwall M, Wilson P (2016). Mendeley readership altmetrics for medical arti-cles: An analysis of 45 fields. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol, 67 (8): 1962-72.
8. Mohammadi E, Thelwall M (2014). Mende-ley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research eval-uation and knowledge flows. J Assn Inf Sci Tec, 65 (8): 1627-38.
9. Erfanmanesh M (2022). The presence of Iranian Information science and library science articles in social media: an alt-metric study. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 32 (2): 349-73.
10. Costas R, Zahedi Z, Wouters P (2015). Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Ex-tensive comparison of altmetric indica-tors with citations from a multidiscipli-nary perspective. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol, 66 (10): 2003-19.
11. Taylor M (2023). Slow, slow, quick, quick, slow: five altmetric sources observed over a decade show evolving trends, by research age, attention source maturity, and open access status. Scientometrics, 128 (4): 2175-2200.
12. Robinson-García N, Torres-Salinas D, Zahedi Z, Costas R (2014). New data, new possibilities: Exploring the insides of Altmetric. com. arXiv: 1408.0135.
13. Barthel S, Tönnies S, Köhncke B, Siehndel P, Balke WT (2015). What does X meas-ure?: influence of diverse user groups in altmetrics. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 119-128). ACM.
14. Kolahi J, Khazaei S (2016). Altmetric: Top 50 dental articles in 2014. Br Dent J, 220 (11): 569-74.
15. Seyyed Hosseini S, Basirian Jahromi R (2021). Iranian Articles in Medical Eth-ics: An Altmetrics Approach on Social Media Vs. a Bibliometric Study in Sco-pus Database. International Journal of Infor-mation Science and Management, 19 (1): 15-26.
16. Seyyedhosseini S, Khosravi A, Assadi M, Jokar N, Basirian Jahromi R (2021). The online attention to certain nuclear med-icine topics: An altmetrics study vs. a ci-tation analysis. Iran J Nucl Med, 29 (2): 65-72.
17. BasirianJahromi R, SeyyedHosseini S (2022). The Status of the Top Midwifery Journals Indexed In Scopus Database: The Journals' Social Impact vs. the Journals' Professional Impact. Interna-tional Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), 20 (1): 273-87.
18. Aletaha A, Soltani A, Dokhani F (2021). Evaluating obesity publications: from bibliometrics to altmetrics. J Diabetes Metab Disord, 20: 391-405.
19. Shrivastava R, Mahajan P (2023). Altmetrics and their relationship with citation counts: a case of journal articles in phys-ics. Global Knowledge, Memory, and Commu-nication, 72 (4/5): 391-407.
20. Saberi MK, Mokhtari H, Ouchi A, Vakilimofrad H (2021). An Altmetrics Analysis of the Articles Published in the Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran (1987-2020). Med J Islam Repub Iran, 35: 189-99.
21. Vainio J, Holmberg K (2017). Highly tweet-ed science articles: who tweet them? An analysis of X user profile descriptions. Scientometrics, 112 (1): 345-66.
22. Baek S, Yoon DY, Lim KJ, et al (2020). Top-cited articles versus top Altmetric articles in nuclear medicine: a compara-tive bibliometric analysis. Acta Radiol, 61 (10):1343-49.
23. Erfanmanesh MA, Hosseini E, Habibi S (2018). Tweets of Scholarly Papers on X. National Studies on Librarianship and Infor-mation Organization, 29 (3): 93-111. [In Persian]
24. Andersen JP, Haustein S (2015). Influence of study type on X activity for medical research papers. arXiv: 150700154.
Files
IssueVol 53 No 9 (2024) QRcode
SectionOriginal Article(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v53i9.16465
Keywords
Scientific productivity Social networks Blended learning Mendeley X (formerly Twitter)
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
SeyyedHosseini S, Yazdankhahfard M, Azargoon M, BasirianJahromi R. The Societal Impact of the Papers Published in Blended Learn-ing in Medicine on Social Network Sites: An Altmetrics Study. Iran J Public Health. 2024;53(9):2121-2129.