Original Article

Assessment of Sexual Health and Use of Cervical Cancer Screening among the Female Working Population

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer occupies a significant place in the overall structure of morbidity and mortality in developing countries. We focused on the sexual health and use of cervical cancer screening among the female working population of reproductive age in Central Serbia.

Methods: The research was conducted as a cross-sectional study, according to the methodology Stepwise approach to noncommunicable disease risk factor surveillance WHO. The study population consisted of 1182 female working population aged 18-49 years, living on the territory of Central Serbia. The method of simple random sampling was utilized in the research itself. An anonymous standardized questionnaire was used as a research tool.

Results: During the first sexual intercourse, 38.9% of the participants reported not having used any of the contraceptives, whereas 74.5% of the participants reported not having used them during their last sexual intercourse and 26.1% of the respondents reported not having had a single Pap smear in their lifetime. The multivariate logistic regression analysis singled out the following factors in women who reported not having done a Pap smear in their lifetime as the most significant ones: age – the youngest age group (OR = 3.30, CI = 1.80-6.04), unemployment (OR = 2.87, CI = 0.07-3.40), women who had never been married or had never been in a common-law marriage (OR = 2.55, CI = 1.40-4.66) and individuals with a medium education level (OR = 2.63, CI = 1.67-4.14).

Conclusion: In Serbia, all the activities should be directed towards increasing the levels of awareness and knowledge on sexual health and cervical cancer screening services.

1. WHO. Reproductive health. Cited 2022, November 9th, Available at: https://www.who.int/westernpacific/health-topics/reproductive-health
2. Rowley J, Vander Hoorn S, Korenromp E, Low N, Unemo M, Abu-Raddad LJ, et al (2015). Global and Regional Estimates of the Prevalence and Incidence of Four Curable Sexually Transmitted In-fections in 2012. PLos One, 10(12): e0143304.
3. WHO: Sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Cited 2022 November 3rd, Availa-ble at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs110/en/
4. Dehne K, Riedner G (2001). Sexually transmitted infections among adoles-cents: the need for adequate health ser-vices. Reprod Health Matters, 9(17):170-83.
5. Hall KS, Moreau C, Trussell J (2012). Con-tinuing social disparities despite upward trends in sexual and reproductive health service use among young women in the United States. Contraception, 86(6):681-6.
6. Institute of public health Serbia “Dr Milan Jovanovic Batut” (2019). Health statisti-cal yearbook of Republic of Serbia. In-stitute of public health Serbia ‘Dr Milan Jovanovic Batut”, Belgrade.
7. Petkeviciene J, Ivanauskiene R, Klumbiene J (2018). Sociodemographic and lifestyle determinants of non-attendance for cervical cancer screening in Lithuania, 2006-2014. Public Health, 156:79-86.91
8. Ba DM, Ssentongo P, Musa J, et al (2021). Prevalence and determinants of cervical cancer screening in five sub-Saharan Af-rican countries: A population-based study. Cancer Epidemiol,72:101930
9. Soneji S, Fukui N (2013). Socioeconomic determinants of cervical cancer screen-ing in Latin America. Rev Panam Salud Publica, 33(3):174-82.
10. Musa J, Achenbach CJ, O'Dwyer LC, et al (2017). Effect of cervical cancer educa-tion and provider recommendation for screening on screening rates: A system-atic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 12(9):e0183924.
11. World Health Organization (2017). WHO STEPS surveillance manual: the WHO STEPwise approach to chronic disease risk factor surveil-lance/Noncommunicable Diseases and Mental Health, World Health Organiza-tion.
12. Kopp Kallner H, Thunell L, Brynhildsen J, et al (2015). Use of Contraception and Attitudes towards Contraceptive Use in Swedish Women-A Nationwide Survey. PLoS One, 10(5):e0125990.
13. Santangelo OE, Provenzano S, Firenze A (2018). Knowledge of sexually transmit-ted infections and sex-at-risk among Italian students of health professions. Data from a one-month survey. Ann Ist Super Sanita, 54(1):40-8.
14. Djordjevic G. The impact of demograph-fic and socioeconomic inequalities on women’s reproductive health. [PhD the-sis]. Faculty of medical sciences Univer-sity of Kragujevac, Serbia; 2020.
15. Seif SA, Kohi TW, Moshiro CS (2017). Care-taker-adolescent communication on sexual and reproductive health: a cross-sectional study in Unguja-Tanzania Zanzibar. BMC Public Health, 18:31.
16. Subotic S, Vukomanovic V, Djukic S, et al (2022). Differences Regarding Knowledge of Sexually Transmitted In-fections, Sexual Habits, and Behavior Between University Students of Medical and Nonmedical Professions in Serbia. Front Public Health, 9:692461.
17. Wulifan JK, Brenner S, Jahn A, De Allegri M (2016). A scoping review on determi-nants of unmet need for family plan-ning among women of reproductive age in low and middle-income countries. BMC Womens Health,16:2.
18. Soneji S, Fukui N (2013). Socioeconomic determinants of cervical cancer screen-ing in Latin America. Rev Panam Salud Publica, 33(3):174-82.
19. Stewart SL, Lakhani N, Brown PM, et al (2013). Gynecologic cancer prevention and control in the National Compre-hensive Cancer Control Program: pro-gress, current activities, and future direc-tions. J Womens Health (Larchmt), 22(8):651-57.
20. Viscondi JYK, Faustino CG, Campolina AG, et al (2018). Simple but not simpler: a systematic review of Markov models for economic evaluation of cervical cancer screening. Clinics (Sao Paulo), 73:e385.
21. Institute of public health Serbia “Dr Milan Jovanovic Batut” (2021). The 2019 Serbi-an National Health Survey. Belgrade. In-stitute of public health Serbia “Dr Milan Jovanovic Batut”, Belgrade.
22. Bruni L, Serrano B, Roura E, et al (2022). Cervical cancer screening programmes and age-specific coverage estimates for 202 countries and territories worldwide: a review and synthetic analysis. Lancet Glob Health, 10(8):e1115-e1127.
23. Theme Filha MM, Leal MD, Oliveira EF, et al (2016). Regional and social inequali-ties in the performance of Pap test and screening mammography and their cor-relation with lifestyle: Brazilian national health survey, 2013. Int J Equity Health, 15(1):136.
24. Forcadell-Díez L, Gotsens M, Leon-Gomez BB, Pérez G (2020). Social Inequalities in Fertility in Women Residing in Urban Neighbourhoods in Spain: A Multilevel Approach. Matern Child Health J, 24(3):267-74.
Files
IssueVol 53 No 1 (2024) QRcode
SectionOriginal Article(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v53i1.14696
Keywords
Sexual health Cervical cancer screening Working population Central Serbia
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Simic Vukomanovic I, Kocic S, Vukomanovic V, Janicijevic K, Šorak M, Simic V, Djukic S, Djordjevic S, Radevic S. Assessment of Sexual Health and Use of Cervical Cancer Screening among the Female Working Population. Iran J Public Health. 2024;53(1):198-207.