Analyzing a New Model of Medical Tourism Policy: Target Country-Specific Models and Marketing Strategies
Abstract
Background: The three-year the pandemic has increased the preference for "safer and healthier" medical tourism destinations at a global level. Busan in South Korea aims to increase its competitiveness as a "medical city" destination. This study aimed to explore the best marketing strategies designed based on country-specific attraction model.
Methods: We collected data from surveys with 10 participants of a focus group from the medical tourism field in Busan and 352 participants of doctors, stakeholders, and moderators working in the medical tourism field in Nov and Dec 2022 to investigate key success factors for the medical tourism in Busan.
Results: The interview identified key target countries and effective strategies such as ease of visa acquisition, non-face-to-face care, insurance billing systems, foreign language expertise, win-win systems for agencies and healthcare organizations, and international accessibility. When participants were asked about their country-specific attraction for patients, they ranked healthcare quality and tourism resources as both important and satisfactory. Although cultural environment, economic support, and administrative support were ranked important, they were less satisfactory. For Japanese patients, the infrastructure showed high levels of importance and satisfaction.
Conclusion: This study identified specific items for a new model of patient attraction customized to target countries. This model was based on cultural background and preferences of each target country. Strategies are needed to strengthen the cultural environment and administrative support. Results of this study can be used to promote medical cities through target specific policies.
2. Abbaspour F, Soltani S , Tham A (2020). Medical tourism for COVID-19 post-crisis recovery?. An International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 32(1):104-43.
3. Fetscherin M, Stephano RM (2016). The medical tourism index: Scale develop-ment and validation. Tourism Management, 52:539-56.
4. Hafizullah D , Kirti K (2022). Smart Healthcare System (SHS): Medical Tour-ism Delivering, Consumption, and Ele-vating Tool in the Ages of Smart Tech-nologies. Tourism Planning & Development, 20(3):397-415.
5. Toubes DR , Araújo-Vila N, Fraiz-Brea JA (2021). Organizational Learning Capaci-ty and Sustainability Challenges in Times of Crisis: A Study on Tourism SMEs in Galicia(Spain). Sustainability, 13(21): 11764.
6. Alan AL, Joseph MC, Michael H, Patrick B, Noel BS (2020). Visions of travel and tourism after the global COVID-19 transformation of 2020. Tourism Geogra-phies, 22(3):455-66.
7. Maria Michelle V J, Jae H K, Timothy J L (2017). Competitiveness attributes of a medical tourism destination: The case of South Korea with importance-performance analysis. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 34(4):444-60.
8. Abhimanyu Sh, Bhawna V, Jyoti A, Tanmay M, Meenu M (2020). Impact of COVID-19 outbreak over Medical Tourism. Jour-nal of Dental and Medical Sciences, 19(5):56-8.
9. KHID (2021). Statistical Analysis of Foreign Patient Attraction Performance (pub-lished June 2022) [In Korea]
10. Jongsik Y, Jungwoon S, Sunghyup S H (2021). Attributes of medical tourism destination brands: case study of the Korean medical tourism market. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 38(1):107-21.
11. KHIDI (2021). Foreign Patient Experience and Satisfaction with Korean Healthcare Survey Report)[In Korea]
12. Medical tour Seoul (2022). Available from: https://www.facebook.com/medicaltourseoulen/
13. Medical Tourism BUSAN(2021).Available from: bsmeditour.go.kr
14. Joo HL, Hong-b K (2018). A study on the selection attributes and satisfaction of health tourism to foster the growth of health tourism industry. Regional Industrial Research, 41(1):115-41.
15. Kwang-Hi, Kim Dk (2015). Activation of Medical Tourism in Korea by Using IPA. Tourism and Leisure Research, 45-65. ISSN 1229-0424, 2713-6582 (Electronic).
16. Hwang J, Choe JY (2020). How to enhance the image of edible insect restaurants: Focusing on perceived risk theory. Int J Hosp Manag (87):102646.
17. Nam TH, Quan VDH (2019). Multi-dimensional Analysis of Perceived Risk on Credit Card Adoption. Beyond Tradi-tional Probabilistic Methods in Economics, Springe:606-20.
18. Megan T (2020). Will medical tourism sur-vive covid-19? BMJ , 370:m2677.
19. Khan MJ, Chelliah S, Khan F, Amin S (2019). Perceived risks, travel constraints and visit intention of young women travelers: the moderating role of travel motivation. Tour Rev, 74(3):721-38.
20. Mosazadeh H, Razi FF, Lajevardi M, et al (2022). Restarting medical tourism in the COVID-19 pandemic: A strategic-based approach. Journal of Health Reports and Technology,8(2); e117932.
21. Rokni L, Turgay AV, Park SH (2017). Barri-ers of developing medical tourism in a destination: A case of South Korea. Iran J Public Health, 46(7):930-37.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 52 No 10 (2023) | |
| Section | Original Article(s) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v52i10.13847 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Medical tourism policy Medical hubs Medical cities South Korea | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
