Original Article

Assessment of the Quality of Cause-of-Death Data in Serbia for 2005-2019 Vital Statistics Performance Index Estimation

Abstract

Background: We aimed to evaluate the quality of the cause of death (COD) concerning mortality patterns and completeness of death registration to identify areas for improvement in Serbia.

Methods: COD data collected from the mortality register in Serbia from 2005 to 2019 (1540615 deaths) were analyzed with the software Analysis of National Causes of Death for Action. The Vital Statistics Performance Index for Quality (VSPI(Q)) is estimated for the overall COD data quality.

Results: The completeness of death certification was higher than 98%. Usable underlying COD was registered in 57%, 24.1% with an unusable and 18.6% with insufficiently specified COD. The VSPI(Q) was 67.2%, denoting medium quality. The typical error was using intermediate COD (24.7% of all deaths), while 13.2% and 8.5% of all garbage codes (GC) belonged to the Very High and High Severity classes. The leading underlying COD is unspecified cardiomyopathy. The analysis revealed that 39.1% of GC has been redistributed to non-communicable diseases, 2.5% to external causes and 1.1% to communicable diseases.

Conclusion: In the 15 years' worth of data analyzed, the true underlying COD, in many cases, was ill-defined, indicating that COD data at the national level could be distorted. The additional and continuous professional education of medical students as well as physicians is needed. It should focus on the most common GC among the leading COD and acquiring skills in certifying external causes of death.

1. Mikkelsen L, Iburg KM, Adair T, et al (2020). Assessing the quality of cause of death data in six high-income countries: Australia, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Japan and Switzerland. Int J Public Health, 65 (1):17-28.
2. Iburg KM, Mikkelsen L, Adair T, Lopez AD (2020). Are cause of death data fit for purpose? evidence from 20 countries at different levels of socio-economic development. PLoS One, 15 (8):e0237539.
3. Gamage USH, Adair T, Mikkelsen L, et al (2021). The impact of errors in medical certification on the accuracy of the underlying cause of death. PLoS One, 16 (11):e0259667.
4. Naghavi M, Abajobir AA, Abbafati C, et al (2017). Global, regional, and national age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet, 390 (10100):1151-1210.
5. Mikkelsen L, Phillips DE, AbouZahr C, et al (2015). A global assessment of civil registration and vital statistics systems: monitoring data quality and progress. Lancet, 386 (10001):1395-1406.
6. GBD 2016 Causes of Death Collaborators (2018). Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet, 392 (10159):1736-1788.
7. Murray CJ, Lopez AD (1997). Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet, 349 (9063):1436-42.
8. Monasta L, Alicandro G, Pasovic M, et al (2022). Redistribution of garbage codes to underlying causes of death: a systematic analysis on Italy and a comparison with most populous Western European countries based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Eur J Public Health, 32(3):456-462.
9. Phillips DE, Lozano R, Naghavi M, et al (2014). A composite metric for assessing data on mortality and causes of death: the vital statistics performance index. Popul Health Metr, 12:14.
10. Mikkelsen L, Moesgaard K, Hegnauer M, Lopez AD (2020). ANACONDA: a new tool to improve mortality and cause of death data. BMC Med, 18 (1):61.
11. Miniño A (2012). Coding and classification of causes of death in accordance with the Tenth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases. National Center for Health Statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ppt/nchs2012/LI-14_MININO.pdf
12. Santosa A, Wall S, Fottrell E, Högberg U, Byass P (2014). The development and experience of epidemiological transition theory over four decades: a systematic review. Glob Health Action, 7:23574.
13. Murray CJ, Lopez AD (1997). Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990-2020: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet, 349 (9064):1498-504.
14. Adair T, Lopez AD (2018). Estimating the completeness of death registration: An empirical method. PLoS One, 13 (5):e0197047.
15. Naghavi M, Richards N, Chowdhury H, et al (2020). Improving the quality of cause of death data for public health policy: are all 'garbage' codes equally problematic? BMC Med, 18 (1):55.
16. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, et al (2012). Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet, 380 (9859):2095-128.
17. Iburg KM, Mikkelsen L, Richards N (2020). Assessment of the quality of cause-of-death data in Greenland, 2006-2015. Scand J Public Health, 48 (8):801-808.
18. Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, et al., editors. Global Burden of Disease and Risk Factors. Washington (DC): The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank; 2006.
19. Nyondo T, Msigwa G, Cobos D, et al (2021). Improving quality of medical certification of causes of death in health facilities in Tanzania 2014–2019. BMC Health Serv Res, 21(Suppl 1):214.
20. França E, Ishitani LH, Teixeira R, et al (2020). Changes in the quality of cause-of-death statistics in Brazil: garbage codes among registered deaths in 1996–2016. Popul Health Metr, 18(Suppl 1):20.
21. Johnson S, Cunningham M, Dippenaar IN, et al (2021). Public health utility of cause of death data: applying empirical algorithms to improve data quality. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 21 (1):175.
22. Omran AR (1971). The epidemiologic transition. A theory of the epidemiology of population change. Milbank Mem Fund Q, 49 (4):509-38.
23. Hart JD, Sorchik R, Bo KS, et al (2020). Improving medical certification of cause of death: effective strategies and approaches based on experiences from the Data for Health Initiative. BMC Med, 18 (1):74.
24. Harteloh P (2020). The implementation of an automated coding system for cause-of-death statistics. Inform Health Soc Care, 45 (1):1-14.
Files
IssueVol 53 No 7 (2024) QRcode
SectionOriginal Article(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v53i7.16047
Keywords
Cause of death Data quality Garbage codes Vital statistics performance index for quality Serbia
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Anđelković Apostolović M, Stojanović M, Bogdanović D, Apostolović B, Topalović M, Milošević Z, Marković R, Ignjatović A. Assessment of the Quality of Cause-of-Death Data in Serbia for 2005-2019 Vital Statistics Performance Index Estimation. Iran J Public Health. 2024;53(7):1528-1536.