A Fast Method for Detection of Fake Venoms and Investigation of Interspecies Variation Using Venoms of Androctonus, Buthus, and Leiurus (Scorpiones: Buthidae) Species
Abstract
Background: Within the scorpion family Buthidae, some of the most dangerous venomous genera are Androctonus (A), Buthus (B), and Leiurus (L). This venom is valuable raw material for numerous therapeutic formulations because of its pharmacological potential; however, because of its high prices in the global market, fake “venom mixes” are being made to market illegally, and it is important that these unknown mixes be evaluated. A fast and accurate response to the request for this identification is necessary.
Method: This study was conducted in Turkey in 2022. Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-Of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is a linear positive-ionization mode was used for identification of scorpion species. The mass spectra of the three scorpion venoms were examined in detail. The peptide and protein profiles in the venoms of congenerous three scorpion venoms and the proportional differences in these venoms were investigated. For interspecific variation, a principal component analysis of all venoms was conducted, and variance values and distance-proximity indices were determined.
Results: The top three peptide masses in the highest relative abundance for A. australis, B. mardochei, and L. quinquestriatus quinquestriatus, respectively, were 6901, 7431, and 7447; 4238, 5283, and 4055; and 3828, 7868, and 6799 Da. While the variance rate between A. australis and the other two venoms was 40%, this rate was 38% between B. mordochei and L. quinquestriatus quinquestriatus venoms.
Conclusion: A very simple protocol of species identification using scorpion venom samples was created using recent advances in MALDI-TOF MS.
2. Chippaux JP (2012). Emerging options for the management of scorpion stings. Drug Des Devel Ther, 6:165-173.
3. Sunagar K, Undheim EAB, Chan AHC, et al (2013). Evolution stings: The origin and diversification of scorpion toxin pep-tide scaffolds. Toxins (Basel), 5(12): 2456–2487.
4. Daoudi K, Malosse C, Lafnoune A, et al (2021). Mass spectrometry‐based top‐down and bottom‐up approaches for proteomic analysis of the Moroccan Bu-thus occitanus scorpion venom. FEBS Open Bio, 11(7):1867-1892.
5. Everson GW (2014). Scorpions. In: Encyclo-pedia of Toxicology. Elsevier: 223–5.
6. Schmidt JO (2019). Arthropod Toxins and Venoms. Medical and Veterinary Ento-mology 3rd ed. United States; Depart-ment of Entomology, University of Ari-zona, Tucson, AZ, United States. Else-vier. p. 23–31.
7. Andreotti N, Jouirou B, Mouhat S, et al (2010). Therapeutic Value of Peptides from Animal Venoms. In: Comprehensive Natural Products II, Chemistry and Biology. Elsevier: 287–303.
8. Numanoğlu Çevik Y, Kanat MA (2022). Discrimination of two species (Androcto-nus crassicauda and Leiurus abdullahbayrami; Buthidae Scorpions) by MALDI-TOF- MS-based PCA. International Journal of Life Sciences and Biotechnology,5(3):370–385.
9. Numanoğlu Çevik Y, Kanat MA (2022). Comparative analysis of peptides and proteins in two congeneric (Leiurus ab-dullahbayrami; Buthidae ) scorpion ven-oms by MALDI-TOF-MS. Biol Divers Con-serv, 15(2): 184-194.
10. Abdel Samad R, al Disi Z, Mohammad Ashfaq MY, et al (2020). The use of prin-ciple component analysis and MALDI-TOF MS for the differentiation of min-eral forming Virgibacillus and Bacillus species isolated from sabkhas. RSC Adv, 10(25):14606–16.
11. Jeong YS, Lee J and, Kim SJ (2013). Dis-crimination of Bacillus anthracis Spores by Direct in-situ Analysis of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption / Ionization Time-Of-Flight Mass Spectrometry. Bull. Ko-rean Chem. Soc,34(9):2635–2639.
12. Ducancel F (2016). Les venins au service de la recherche médicale.Biologie Aujourd'hui, (2):89–99.
13. Mlayah-Bellalouna S, Dufour M, Mabrouk K, et al (2014). AaTX1 from Androctonus australis scorpion venom: Purification, synthesis and characterization in dopa-minergic neurons. Toxicon,92:14–23.
14. Martin-Eauclaire MF, Céard B, Belghazi M, et al (2013). Characterization of the first K+ channel blockers from the venom of the Moroccan scorpion Buthus occitanus Paris. Toxicon,75: 168–76.
15. Marrouchi R, Rome G, Zakarian A, et al (2013). Analysis of the action of cyclic imine phycotoxins on the mouse neu-romuscular system in vivo. Toxicon,75: 213–4.
16. Legros C, Feyfant E, Sampieri F, et al (1997). Influence of a NH2-terminal ex-tension on the activity of KTX2, a K+ channel blocker purified from Androcto-nus australis scorpion venom. FEBS Let-ters, 417(1):123-9.
17. Kuzmenkov AI, Grishin EV, Vassilevski AA (2015). Diversity of Potassium Channel Ligands: Focus on Scorpion Toxins. Bio-chemistry (Mosc), 80(13):1764–99.
18. Hmed B, Serria HT, Mounir ZK (2013). Scorpion Peptides: Potential Use for New Drug Development. J Toxicol ,2013:958797.
19. Jolodar A (2019). Molecular characteriza-tion of a three-disulfide bridges beta-like neurotoxin from Androctonus crassi-cauda scorpion venom. Arch Razi Inst,74(2):135–142.
20. Pucca MB, Ahmadi S, Cerni FA, et al (2020). Unity Makes Strength: Exploring Intra-species and Interspecies Toxin Syner-gism between Phospholipases A2 and Cytotoxins. Front Pharmacol ,11:611.
21. Martin-Eauclaire MF, Bosmans F, Céard B, et al (2014). A first exploration of the venom of the Buthus occitanus scorpion found in southern France. Toxicon,79: 55–63
22. Kumar RB, Priya BS, Suresh MX (2015). In silico analysis of potential inhibitors of Ca 2+ activated K + channel blocker, Charybdotoxin-C from Leiurus quin-questriatus hebraeus through molecular docking and dynamics studies. Indian J Pharmacol,47(3):280-4.
23. Nafie MS, Abdel Daim MM, Ali IAI, et al (2020). Antitumor efficacy of the Egyp-tian Scorpion Venom Androctonus Austra-lis: in vitro and in vivo study. The Journal of Basic and Applied Zoology ,10;81(1):8.
24. Dutertre S (2014). Venomics in medicinal chemistry. Future Med Chem,6(15):1609–10.
25. Erdeş E, Doğan T, Coşar İ, et al (2014). Characterization of Leiurus abdul-lahbayrami (Scorpiones: Buthidae) ven-om: peptide profile, cytotoxicity and an-timicrobial activity. Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Dis-eases,20(1):48: 1-8.
26. Schaffrath S, Prendini L, Predel R (2018). Intraspecific venom variation in south-ern African scorpion species of the genera Parabuthus, Uroplectes and Opistoph-thalmus (Scorpiones: Buthidae, Scorpi-onidae). Toxicon, 144:83–90.
27. Oukkache N, Rosso JP, Alami M, et al (2008) New analysis of the toxic com-pounds from the Androctonus mauretanicus mauretanicus scorpion venom. Toxi-con,51(5):835–52.
28. Estrada-Gómez S, Vargas-Muñoz LJ, Sal-darriaga-Córdoba MM, (2021). MS/MS analysis of four scorpion venoms from Colombia: A descriptive approach. J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis, 27: e20200173.
29. Sarhan M, Badry A, Younes M, Saleh M (2020). Genetic diversity within Leiurus quinquestriatus (Scorpiones: Buthidae) populations in Egypt as inferred from 16S mDNA sequence analysis. Zool Mid-dle East, 66(3):269–276.
30. Schaffrath S, Predel R (2014). A simple pro-tocol for venom peptide barcoding in scorpions. EuPA Open Proteomics, 3:239–45.
31. Al-Asmari AK, Kunnathodi F, al Saadon K, et al (2016). Elemental analysis of scor-pion venoms. J Venom Res, 7:16–20.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 52 No 8 (2023) | |
| Section | Original Article(s) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v52i8.13408 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Androctonus australis Buthidae Buthus mardochei Leiurus quinquestriatus quinquestriatus Scorpiones | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
