Original Article

The Effect of Home Care Poverty on the Activities of Daily Living among Older Adults in China: A Propensity Score Matching Study

Abstract

Background: In the context of home care being valued by the Chinese government and the increasing number of disabled older adults, it is of great significance to explore the effect of home care poverty of the older adults on their ability to perform activities of daily living.

Methods: A research sample of 2583 older adults from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey data in 2018 was adopted. There were 422 participants in the treatment group and 2161 participants in the control group. According to the framework of counterfactual analysis, the kernel matching method was used to match the treatment and control groups to calculate the values of average treatment effects on treated (ATT).

Results: The results of the kernel matching method showed that the factual ADL score of the treatment group was 6.886, the counterfactual ADL score of the control group was 8.520, and the ATT value was -1.634 (P<0.05). There were gender and urban-rural differences in the relationship between home care poverty and activities of daily living among older people. In gender samples, there was a significant correlation between the two, and the absolute value of ATT in male samples was higher than that in female samples (P<0.05). In the rural samples, there was a significant correlation between the two variables (P<0.05). But in the urban samples, there was no significant correlation between the two variables.

Conclusion: Home care poverty could significantly reduce the ability to perform activities of daily living among older adults in China. Based on the conclusions, the study puts forward several suggestions to solve the home care poverty for the older adults in China.

1. Xu X, Chen L (2019). Influencing factors of disability among the elderly in China, 2003-2016: application of Bayesian quan-tile regression. J Med Econ, 22(6):605–11.
2. Luo Y, Su B, Zheng X (2021). Trends and Challenges for Population and Health during Population Aging — China, 2015–2050. China CDC Wkly, 3(28):593–8.
3. Kane R (1995). Expanding the Home Care Concept - Blurring Distinctions among Home Care, Institutional Care, and Oth-er Long-Term-Care Services. Milbank Q, 73(2):161–86.
4. Murashima S, Nagata S, Magilvy JK, et al (2002). Home Care Nursing in Japan: A Challenge for Providing Good Care at Home. Public Health Nurs, 19(2):94–103.
5. Wilson D, Truman CD, Huang J, et al (2005), Noseworthy T. The Possibilities and the Realities of Home Care. Can J Public Health, 96(5):385–9.
6. Thome B, Dykes AK, Hallberg IR (2003). Home care with regard to definition, care recipients, content and outcome: systematic literature review. J Clin Nurs, 12(6):860–72.
7. Aaltonen MS, Van Aerschot LH (2021). Unmet care needs are common among community-dwelling older people with memory problems in Finland. Scand J Public Health, 49(4):423–32.
8. Van Houtven CH, Konetzka RT, Taggert E, et al (2020). Informal And Formal Home Care For Older Adults With Disabilities Increased, 2004-16. Health Aff, 39(8):1297–301.
9. Yakerson A (2019). Home Care in Ontario: Perspectives on Equity. Int J Health Serv, 49(2):260–72.
10. Liu K, Manton KG, Aragon C (2000). Changes in home care use by disabled elderly persons: 1982-1994. J Gerontol Ser B-Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 55(4):S245–53.
11. Lin IF, Wu HS (2011). Does Informal Care Attenuate the Cycle of ADL/IADL Dis-ability and Depressive Symptoms in Late Life? J Gerontol Ser B-Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 66(5):585–94.
12. Worobey J, Angel R (1990). Functional-Capacity and Living Arrangements of Unmarried Elderly Persons. J Gerontol, 45(3):95–101.
13. Goh AMY, Polacsek M, Malta S, et al (2022). What constitutes ‘good’ home care for people with dementia? An investigation of the views of home care service recip-ients and providers. BMC Geriatr, 22(1):42.
14. Jarling A, Rydstrom I, Fransson E, et al (2022). Relationships first: Formal and informal home care of older adults in Sweden. Health Soc Care Community, 30(5):3207-18.
15. Jeong S, Inoue Y, Arai Y, et al (2022). What Should Be Considered When Evaluating the Quality of Home Care? A Survey of Expert Opinions on the Evaluation of the Quality of Home Care in Japan. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 19(4):2361.
16. van Bavel B, Lafferty A, O’Sullivan D, et al (2017). At the interface between formal and informal care: Supporting families caring for a person with Intellectual Disability in Ireland. Int J Integr Care, 11(2):17.
17. Chiao CY, Wu HS, Hsiao CY (2015). Care-giver burden for informal caregivers of patients with dementia: A systematic re-view. Int Nurs Rev, 62(3):340–50.
18. Gao M, Sa Z, Li Y, et al (2018). Does social participation reduce the risk of func-tional disability among older adults in China? A survival analysis using the 2005-2011 waves of the CLHLS data. BMC Geriatr, 21(8):224.
19. S K, Ab F, Rw M, et al (1963). Studies of ill-ness in the aged. The index of adl: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA, 21(01):185.
20. Ataman G, Erbaydar T (2017). Unmet home healthcare needs and quality of life in cancer patients: ahospital-based Turkish sample. Health Soc Care Communi-ty, 25(4):1347–54.
21. Otero A, de Yebenes MJG, Rodriguez-Laso A, et al (2003). Unmet home care needs among community-dwelling elderly people in Spain. Aging Clin Exp Res, 15(3):234–42.
22. Chong N, Akobirshoev I, Caldwell J, et al (2022). The relationship between unmet need for home and community-based services and health and community liv-ing outcomes. Disabil Health J, 15(2):101222.
23. Abusalem S, Myers JA, Aljeesh Y (2013). Pa-tient satisfaction in home health care. J Clin Nurs, 22(17):2426–35.
24. Dostálová V, Bártová A, Bláhová H, et al (2021). The needs of older people re-ceiving home care: a scoping review. Ag-ing Clin Exp Res, 33(3):495–504.
25. Komisar HL, Feder J, Kasper JD (2005). Unmet long-term care needs: An analy-sis of medicare-medicaid dual eligible. Inquiry-, 42(2):171–82.
26. Shen S, Li F, Tanui JK (2014). Long-Term Care Insurance in China: Public or Pri-vate? Soc Work Health Care, 53(7):679–92.
27. Feinglass J, Norman G, Golden RL, et al (2018). Integrating Social Services and Home-Based Primary Care for High-Risk Patients. Popul Health Manag, 21(2):96–101.
28. Pushpangadan M, Burns E (1996). Caring for older people: Community services: Health. BMJ, 313(7060):805–8.
29. Iparraguirre JL (2020). Reductions in local government spending on community-based social care and unmet social care needs of older people in England. J Econ Ageing, 17:100126.
Files
IssueVol 52 No 11 (2023) QRcode
SectionOriginal Article(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v52i11.14032
Keywords
Home care Care poverty Activities of daily living Older adults Propensity score matching

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Li Y, Liu X. The Effect of Home Care Poverty on the Activities of Daily Living among Older Adults in China: A Propensity Score Matching Study. Iran J Public Health. 2023;52(11):2325-2332.