Bibliometric Analysis of Published Original Research Articles on Leisure Constraints between 1991 and 2019
,
Abstract
Background: The decrease in the frequency and duration of participation in leisure activities has negative effects on the physical, cognitive and psychological health of individuals. In this context, identifying the obstacles, which prevent individuals from participating in leisure activities, may offer important clues to institutions and organizations in taking measures to increase participation.
Methods: The bibliometric analysis method was used in this study. The research was carried out with 306 articles scanned from the Web of Science (WoS) core database between 1991 and 2019.
Results: Studies conducted in leisure area increased systematically according to 5-year periods and mostly authors from USA, Australia and Canada produced them. The mainstream subjects, which attracted the attention of researchers during recent years, are detected to be self-efficacy, segmentation, mental health and fear related to intrapersonal constraint topics.
Conclusion: In order to cope with physical and mental health problems resulting from aging of the world population, and technological developments, and negative effects generated by inactive modern life style, priority should be given to studies on leisure constraints to be conducted on a more comprehensive basis. Another suggestion is to encourage health policies and applications which can increase participation in leisure activities.
1. Jackson EL (1990). Variations in the desire to begin a leisure activity: Evidence of antecedent constraints? J Leisure Res, 22: 55-70.
2. Jackson EL, Henderson KA (1995). Gender-based analysis of leisure constraints. Leisure Sci, 17(1): 31-51.
3. Iso-Ahola SE (1981). Leisure counseling at the crossroads. Couns Psychol, 9(3): 71-4.
4. Iso-Ahola SE, Mannell R. (1985). Social and psychological constraints on leisure. In: Constraints on Leisure, Ed, MG Wade. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, p. 131.
5. Crawford DW, Godbey G (1987). Reconceptualizing barriers to family leisure. Leisure Sci, 9(2): 119–27.
6. Crawford DW, Jackson EL, Godbey G (1991). A hierarchical model of leisure constraints. Leisure Sci, 13(4): 309-20.
7. World Leisure Organization. (2018, October 30). 2018 São Paulo declaration urges to enforce leisure as a human right. https://www.worldleisure.org/2018-sao-paulo-declaration-urges-to-enforce-leisure-as-a-human-right/
8. Dieleman JL, Sadat N, Chang AY, et al (2018). Trends in future health financing and coverage: future health spending and universal health coverage in 188 countries, 2016–40. Lancet, 391: 1783-98.
9. Kelly JR (2012). Leisure. 4th ed. Sagamore Publishing LLC. Urbana.
10. Bell EJ, Lutsey PL, Windham BG, et al (2013). Physical activity and cardiovascular disease in African Americans in ARIC. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 45(5): 901-7.
11. Lin YT, Chen M, Ho CC, et al (2020). Relationships among leisure physical activity, sedentary lifestyle, physical fitness, and happiness in adults 65 years or older in Taiwan. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 17(14): 5235.
12. Oh HS (2020). Opposite effects of work-related physical activity and leisure-time physical activity on the risk of diabetes in Korean adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 17(16): 5812.
13. Schwarzenegger A, Chrisman M, Coleman R. (2005). The Health and Social Benefits of Recreation. Sacramento, California: State of California Resources Agency [Internet]. [updated 2022 Nov 02; cited 2005]. Available from: https://www.nps.gov/goga/learn/management/upload/1536_ca-health_benefits_081505-2.pdf
14. Haworth J, Lewis S (2005). Work, leisure and well-being. Br J Guid Counc, 33(1): 67-79.
15. Choi C, Bum CH (2019). Physical leisure activity and work for quality of life in the elderly. J Phys Educ Sport, 19(2): 1230-5.
16. Losier GF, Bourque PE, Vallerand RJ (1993). A motivational model of leisure participation in the elderly. J Psychol, 127(2): 153-70.
17. Sperlich S, Beller J, Epping J, et al (2020). Trends in self-rated health among the elderly population in Germany from 1995 to 2015–the influence of temporal change in leisure time physical activity. BMC Public Health, 20(1): 113.
18. Kurt G, Kurt V, Ülger Ö (2022). Family and personal factors associated with the participation of children with special needs in leisure activities: A Turkish perspective. Arch Pediatrie, 29(2): 121-7.
19. Lundgren BW, Karlsudd P (2014). Special needs education perspectives in the practice of leisure-time centres. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 1: 51-61.
20. Sivan A (2000). Leisure education, quality of life and populations with special needs. In: Leisure Education, Community Development and Populations with Special Needs, Eds, A Sivara, H Ruskin. CABI Publishing, UK, pp. 109-17.
21. Chen CY, Wang IA, Wang N, et al (2019). Leisure activity participation in relation to alcohol purchasing and consumption in adolescence. Addict Behav, 90: 294-300.
22. Öztürk ÖT (2019). Leisure satisfaction of sports science students. Int Educ Stud, 12(4): 42-8.
23. Rosa CD, Collado S, Profice CC, et al (2019). Nature-based recreation associated with connectedness to nature and leisure satisfaction among students in Brazil. Leis Stud, 38(5): 682-91.
24. Tükel Y (2020). Investigation of the relationship between smartphone addiction and leisure satisfaction of university students. IJTES, 4(3): 218-26.
25. Yoo J (2022). Attitude toward leisure, satisfaction with leisure policy, and happiness aremediated by satisfaction with leisure activities. Sci Rep, 12(1): 11723.
26. Henderson KA, Ainsworth BE (2002). En-joyment: A link to physical activity, lei-sure, and health. J Park Recreat Admi, 20(4): 130-46.
27. Kang, JW (2014). Perceived constraints on sport participation among young Kore-ans in Australia. International Journal of Sport and Health Sciences, 7(5): 1321-7.
28. Zhang X, Chen H, Wang W, et al (2016). What is the role of IT in innovation? A bibliometric analysis of research devel-opment in IT innovation. Behav Inform Technol, 35(12): 1130-43.
29. Cobo MJ, López-Herrera AG, Herrera-Viedma E, et al (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec, 62(7): 1382-402.
30. Ye Q, Song H, Li T (2012). Cross-institutional collaboration networks in tourism and hospitality research. Tour Manag Perspect, 2: 55-64.
31. Zupic I, Cater T (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3): 429-72.
32. Nerur SP, Rasheed AA, Natarajan V (2008). The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: An author co-citation analysis. Strateg Manag J, 29(3): 319-36.
33. Jiang Y, Ritchie BW, Benckendorff P (2019). Bibliometric visualisation: An application in tourism crisis and disaster management research. Curr Issues Tour, 22(16): 1925-57.
34. Chen C (2017). Science mapping: A systematic review of the literature. J Data Inf Sci, 2(2): 1-40.
35. Chen C-C, Fu X, Chang C-Y (2016). A terms mining and clustering technique for surveying network and content analysis of academic groups exploration. Cluster Comput, 20: 43-52.
36. Newman MEJ (2004). Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Phys Rev E, 69(6): 066111.
37. Doğru M, Güzeller CO, Çelik M (2019). A bibliometric analysis in the field of sustainable development and education from past to present. Adıyaman University Journal of Educational Sciences, 9: 42-68.
38. Su X, Li X, Kang Y (2019). A Bibliometric analysis of research on intangible cultural heritage using citespace. SAGE Open, 9(2): 1-18.
39. Paez A (2017). Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews. J Evid Based Med, 10(3): 233-40.
40. Bellefontaine SP, Lee CM (2013). Between black and white: Examining grey literature in meta-analyses of psychological research. J Child Fam Stud, 23(8): 1378-88.
41. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al (2009). Prisma group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med, 6(7): e1000097.
42. Godbey G, Crawford DW, Shen XS (2017). Assessing hierarchical leisure constraints theory after two decades. J Leisure Res, 42: 111-34.
43. Jackson EL, Crawford DW, Godbey G (1993). Negotiation of leisure constraints. Leisure Sci, 15(1): 1-11.
44. White DD (2008). A structural model of leisure constraints negotiation in outdoor recreation. Leisure Sci, 30(4): 342-59.
45. Nyaupane GP, Andereck KL (2008). Understanding travel constraints: Application and extension of a leisure constraints model. J Travel Res, 46(4): 433-39.
46. Son JS, Mowen AJ, Kerstetter DL (2008). Testing alternative leisure constraint negotiation models: An extension of Hubbard and Mannell's study. Leisure Sci, 30(3): 198-216.
47. Shaw SM, Bonen A, McCabe JF (1991). Do more constraints mean less leisure? Examining the relationship between constraints and participation. J Leisure Res, 23(4): 286-300.
48. Lyu SO, Oh C-O, Lee H. (2013). The influence of extraversion on leisure constraints negotiation process: A case of Korean people with disabilities. J Leisure Res, 45(2): 233-52.
49. Chen H-J, Chen PJ, Okumus F (2013). The relationship between travel constraints and destination image: A case study of Brunei. Tourism Manage, 35: 198-208.
50. Alexandris K, Kouthouris C, Funk D, et al (2013). The use of negotiation strategies among recreational participants with different involvement levels: The case of recreational swimmers. Leisure Stud, 32(3): 299-317.
51. Alexandris K, Du J, Funk D, et al (2017). Leisure constraints and the psychological continuum model: A study among recreational mountain skiers. Leisure Stud, 36(5): 670-83.
52. Alexandris K, Karagiorgos T, Ntovoli A, et al (2022). Using the theories of planned behaviour and leisure constraints to study fitness club members’ behaviour after Covid-19 lockdown. Leisure Stud, 42(2): 247-62.
53. Köse E, Seyman D, Yıldırım FS, et al (2021). Bibliometric analysis of HIV and exercise literature based on scientific studies from 1990-2020. Iran J Public Health, 50(12): 2397-410.
54. McLean D, Hurd RA (2015). Kraus’ recreation and leisure in modern society. 10th ed. Jones & Bartlett Learning Publishers. UK.
55. Lee JH, Scott D, Floyd MF (2001). Structural inequalities in outdoor recreation participation: A multiple hierarchy stratification perspective. J Leisure Res, 33(4): 427-49.
56. Godbey GC, Caldwell LL, Floyd M, et al (2005). Contributions of leisure studies and recreation and park management research to the active living agenda. Am J Prev Med, 28(2): 150-8.
2. Jackson EL, Henderson KA (1995). Gender-based analysis of leisure constraints. Leisure Sci, 17(1): 31-51.
3. Iso-Ahola SE (1981). Leisure counseling at the crossroads. Couns Psychol, 9(3): 71-4.
4. Iso-Ahola SE, Mannell R. (1985). Social and psychological constraints on leisure. In: Constraints on Leisure, Ed, MG Wade. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, p. 131.
5. Crawford DW, Godbey G (1987). Reconceptualizing barriers to family leisure. Leisure Sci, 9(2): 119–27.
6. Crawford DW, Jackson EL, Godbey G (1991). A hierarchical model of leisure constraints. Leisure Sci, 13(4): 309-20.
7. World Leisure Organization. (2018, October 30). 2018 São Paulo declaration urges to enforce leisure as a human right. https://www.worldleisure.org/2018-sao-paulo-declaration-urges-to-enforce-leisure-as-a-human-right/
8. Dieleman JL, Sadat N, Chang AY, et al (2018). Trends in future health financing and coverage: future health spending and universal health coverage in 188 countries, 2016–40. Lancet, 391: 1783-98.
9. Kelly JR (2012). Leisure. 4th ed. Sagamore Publishing LLC. Urbana.
10. Bell EJ, Lutsey PL, Windham BG, et al (2013). Physical activity and cardiovascular disease in African Americans in ARIC. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 45(5): 901-7.
11. Lin YT, Chen M, Ho CC, et al (2020). Relationships among leisure physical activity, sedentary lifestyle, physical fitness, and happiness in adults 65 years or older in Taiwan. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 17(14): 5235.
12. Oh HS (2020). Opposite effects of work-related physical activity and leisure-time physical activity on the risk of diabetes in Korean adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 17(16): 5812.
13. Schwarzenegger A, Chrisman M, Coleman R. (2005). The Health and Social Benefits of Recreation. Sacramento, California: State of California Resources Agency [Internet]. [updated 2022 Nov 02; cited 2005]. Available from: https://www.nps.gov/goga/learn/management/upload/1536_ca-health_benefits_081505-2.pdf
14. Haworth J, Lewis S (2005). Work, leisure and well-being. Br J Guid Counc, 33(1): 67-79.
15. Choi C, Bum CH (2019). Physical leisure activity and work for quality of life in the elderly. J Phys Educ Sport, 19(2): 1230-5.
16. Losier GF, Bourque PE, Vallerand RJ (1993). A motivational model of leisure participation in the elderly. J Psychol, 127(2): 153-70.
17. Sperlich S, Beller J, Epping J, et al (2020). Trends in self-rated health among the elderly population in Germany from 1995 to 2015–the influence of temporal change in leisure time physical activity. BMC Public Health, 20(1): 113.
18. Kurt G, Kurt V, Ülger Ö (2022). Family and personal factors associated with the participation of children with special needs in leisure activities: A Turkish perspective. Arch Pediatrie, 29(2): 121-7.
19. Lundgren BW, Karlsudd P (2014). Special needs education perspectives in the practice of leisure-time centres. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 1: 51-61.
20. Sivan A (2000). Leisure education, quality of life and populations with special needs. In: Leisure Education, Community Development and Populations with Special Needs, Eds, A Sivara, H Ruskin. CABI Publishing, UK, pp. 109-17.
21. Chen CY, Wang IA, Wang N, et al (2019). Leisure activity participation in relation to alcohol purchasing and consumption in adolescence. Addict Behav, 90: 294-300.
22. Öztürk ÖT (2019). Leisure satisfaction of sports science students. Int Educ Stud, 12(4): 42-8.
23. Rosa CD, Collado S, Profice CC, et al (2019). Nature-based recreation associated with connectedness to nature and leisure satisfaction among students in Brazil. Leis Stud, 38(5): 682-91.
24. Tükel Y (2020). Investigation of the relationship between smartphone addiction and leisure satisfaction of university students. IJTES, 4(3): 218-26.
25. Yoo J (2022). Attitude toward leisure, satisfaction with leisure policy, and happiness aremediated by satisfaction with leisure activities. Sci Rep, 12(1): 11723.
26. Henderson KA, Ainsworth BE (2002). En-joyment: A link to physical activity, lei-sure, and health. J Park Recreat Admi, 20(4): 130-46.
27. Kang, JW (2014). Perceived constraints on sport participation among young Kore-ans in Australia. International Journal of Sport and Health Sciences, 7(5): 1321-7.
28. Zhang X, Chen H, Wang W, et al (2016). What is the role of IT in innovation? A bibliometric analysis of research devel-opment in IT innovation. Behav Inform Technol, 35(12): 1130-43.
29. Cobo MJ, López-Herrera AG, Herrera-Viedma E, et al (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec, 62(7): 1382-402.
30. Ye Q, Song H, Li T (2012). Cross-institutional collaboration networks in tourism and hospitality research. Tour Manag Perspect, 2: 55-64.
31. Zupic I, Cater T (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3): 429-72.
32. Nerur SP, Rasheed AA, Natarajan V (2008). The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: An author co-citation analysis. Strateg Manag J, 29(3): 319-36.
33. Jiang Y, Ritchie BW, Benckendorff P (2019). Bibliometric visualisation: An application in tourism crisis and disaster management research. Curr Issues Tour, 22(16): 1925-57.
34. Chen C (2017). Science mapping: A systematic review of the literature. J Data Inf Sci, 2(2): 1-40.
35. Chen C-C, Fu X, Chang C-Y (2016). A terms mining and clustering technique for surveying network and content analysis of academic groups exploration. Cluster Comput, 20: 43-52.
36. Newman MEJ (2004). Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Phys Rev E, 69(6): 066111.
37. Doğru M, Güzeller CO, Çelik M (2019). A bibliometric analysis in the field of sustainable development and education from past to present. Adıyaman University Journal of Educational Sciences, 9: 42-68.
38. Su X, Li X, Kang Y (2019). A Bibliometric analysis of research on intangible cultural heritage using citespace. SAGE Open, 9(2): 1-18.
39. Paez A (2017). Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews. J Evid Based Med, 10(3): 233-40.
40. Bellefontaine SP, Lee CM (2013). Between black and white: Examining grey literature in meta-analyses of psychological research. J Child Fam Stud, 23(8): 1378-88.
41. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al (2009). Prisma group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med, 6(7): e1000097.
42. Godbey G, Crawford DW, Shen XS (2017). Assessing hierarchical leisure constraints theory after two decades. J Leisure Res, 42: 111-34.
43. Jackson EL, Crawford DW, Godbey G (1993). Negotiation of leisure constraints. Leisure Sci, 15(1): 1-11.
44. White DD (2008). A structural model of leisure constraints negotiation in outdoor recreation. Leisure Sci, 30(4): 342-59.
45. Nyaupane GP, Andereck KL (2008). Understanding travel constraints: Application and extension of a leisure constraints model. J Travel Res, 46(4): 433-39.
46. Son JS, Mowen AJ, Kerstetter DL (2008). Testing alternative leisure constraint negotiation models: An extension of Hubbard and Mannell's study. Leisure Sci, 30(3): 198-216.
47. Shaw SM, Bonen A, McCabe JF (1991). Do more constraints mean less leisure? Examining the relationship between constraints and participation. J Leisure Res, 23(4): 286-300.
48. Lyu SO, Oh C-O, Lee H. (2013). The influence of extraversion on leisure constraints negotiation process: A case of Korean people with disabilities. J Leisure Res, 45(2): 233-52.
49. Chen H-J, Chen PJ, Okumus F (2013). The relationship between travel constraints and destination image: A case study of Brunei. Tourism Manage, 35: 198-208.
50. Alexandris K, Kouthouris C, Funk D, et al (2013). The use of negotiation strategies among recreational participants with different involvement levels: The case of recreational swimmers. Leisure Stud, 32(3): 299-317.
51. Alexandris K, Du J, Funk D, et al (2017). Leisure constraints and the psychological continuum model: A study among recreational mountain skiers. Leisure Stud, 36(5): 670-83.
52. Alexandris K, Karagiorgos T, Ntovoli A, et al (2022). Using the theories of planned behaviour and leisure constraints to study fitness club members’ behaviour after Covid-19 lockdown. Leisure Stud, 42(2): 247-62.
53. Köse E, Seyman D, Yıldırım FS, et al (2021). Bibliometric analysis of HIV and exercise literature based on scientific studies from 1990-2020. Iran J Public Health, 50(12): 2397-410.
54. McLean D, Hurd RA (2015). Kraus’ recreation and leisure in modern society. 10th ed. Jones & Bartlett Learning Publishers. UK.
55. Lee JH, Scott D, Floyd MF (2001). Structural inequalities in outdoor recreation participation: A multiple hierarchy stratification perspective. J Leisure Res, 33(4): 427-49.
56. Godbey GC, Caldwell LL, Floyd M, et al (2005). Contributions of leisure studies and recreation and park management research to the active living agenda. Am J Prev Med, 28(2): 150-8.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 52 No 12 (2023) | |
| Section | Original Article(s) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v52i12.14318 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Bibliometric analysis Leisure constraints Mental health Physical activity Public health | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
How to Cite
1.
Köse E, Yerlisu Lapa T, Gökçe H, Alexandris K, Yücel AS. Bibliometric Analysis of Published Original Research Articles on Leisure Constraints between 1991 and 2019. Iran J Public Health. 2023;52(12):2572-2582.
