Review Article

Measures to Use Electroceuticals and Secure Social Reliability in Korea: A Narrative Review

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to present a plan for utilizing electroceuticals to secure social reliability in Korea by investigating and analyzing the trends of humanities and social science research in Korea regarding electroceuticals. 

Methods: The present situation of academic papers in the fields of humanities and social sciences that had researched electroceuticals in Korea and the topics that were directly related to electroceuticals had been reviewed and analyzed.

Results: Regarding researches related to electroceuticals in the fields of humanities and social sciences in Korea, they were insufficient quantitatively. Qualitatively, they had leaned too much toward theoretical and abstract discourses regarding neuroethics and neurophilosophy. 

Conclusion: If researches in the fields of humanities and social sciences known to play a role in preparing practical guidelines could be carried out sufficiently while preparing a base for solving actual problems raised by electroceuticals, they could actually help plan a specific electroceuticals policy and a law to secure social reliability. Among principles of general life medical ethics (principles of biomedical ethics), when considering the principle of justice, the investment by the Korean government regarding research and development of electroceuticals, the rationalization of electroceuticals regulations, the application of electroceuticals of public health insurance benefit, and voluntary efforts of electroceuticals corporations are important in order to have strong plans for securing the social reliability of electroceuticals.

1. Famm K (2013). A-jump start for elelctroceuticals. Nature, 496(11): 159–161.
2. Pascual-Leone A, Wagner T (2007). A brief summary of the history of noninvasive brain stimulation. Annu Rev Biomed Eng, 9(1): 527-65.
3. Bahadori M, Sorkhabadi SMR, Tabaei SF, Farhud DD (2020). Convergence Science to Transform Biomedicine. Iran J Public Health, 49(2): 221-29.
4. Mishra S (2017). Electroceuticals in medi-cine: The brave new future. Indian Heart J, 69(5): 685-6.
5. Kim YH et al (2020). R&D Trends in Bioe-lectronic Medicines. Electronics and Telecom-munications Trends, 35(3): 107-8. [In Kore-an]
6. Korea Health Industry Development Insti-tute (2021). 2020 Medical Device Industry Analysis Report, Cheongju-si: Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI): 19. Available from: https://www.khidi.or.kr/ [In Korean]
7. Kang SG (2021). Technological develop-ment trend of electroceuticals as non-pharmaceutical treatment technology. Convergence Research Review, 7(8): 53. [In Ko-rean]
8. McCallum AK (2002). Mallet: A machine learning for language toolkit. Available from: https://mimno.github.io/Mallet/
9. World Economic Forum (2018). Top 10 Emerging Technologies 2018, Geneva: World Economic Forum. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/Top10_Emerging_Technologies_report_2018.pdf
10. Kim YH et al (2020). R&D Trends in Bioe-lectronic Medicines. Electronics and Telecom-munications Trends, 35(3): 107-9. [In Kore-an]
11. Kang SG (2021). Technological develop-ment trend of electroceuticals as non-pharmaceutical treatment technology. Convergence Research Review, 7(8): 58-60. [In Korean]
12. Korea Health Industry Development Insti-tute (2021). 2020 Medical Device Industry Analysis Report, Cheongju-si: Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI): 34-5. Available from: https://www.khidi.or.kr/ [In Korean]
13. Ministry of Health and Welfare (2021). The work plan of the Ministry of Health and Welfare for 2022, Sejong-si: Ministry of Health and Welfare: 20. Available from: http://www.mohw.go.kr/ [In Korean]
14. Seo BR, Park SH (2018). Policies to Promote Medical Tourism in Korea: A Narrative Review. Iran J Public Health, 47(8): 1077–1083.
15. Levy N (2007). Neuroethics: Challenges for the 21st Century, Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press: 1-2.
16. O’Connor C, Joffe H (2014). Social repre-sentations of brain research: Exploring public (dis) engagement with contempo-rary neuroscience. Science Communication, 36(5): 617-45.
17. Rhee YE (2021). The Philosophy of Neuroscience: From Brain-centrism to Embodimentism, Gyeonggi-do: Acanet: 9-15. [Korean Book]
18. Chu BW (2019). Neuroethics and Neuromoral Education, Seoul (Korea): Hankook-munhwasa: 219. [Korean Book]
19. Buchanan A (2011). Better than Human: The Promise and Perils of Enhancing Ourselves, Ox-ford: Oxford University Press: 5-6.
20. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (2013). Princi-ples of Biomedical Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 17-24.
21. Buchanan A, Brock DW, Daniels N, Win-kler D (2001). From Chance to Choice: Genet-ics and Justice, Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press: 127-8.
22. Korea Health Industry Development Insti-tute (2021). 2020 Medical Device Industry Analysis Report, Cheongju-si: Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI): 8-9. Available from: https://www.khidi.or.kr/ [In Korean]
23. Kang SG (2021). Technological develop-ment trend of electroceuticals as non-pharmaceutical treatment technology. Convergence Research Review, 7(8): 37-8. [In Korean]
24. National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation (2020). 2020 Newly Developed Medical Device Prospect Analysis Report, Cheongju-si: National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation (NIFDS): 3-5. Available from: https://www.nifds.go.kr/ [In Korean]
25. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (2020). Digital Therapeutics License Review Guidelines, Cheongju-si: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS): 7-16. Available from: https://www.mfds.go.kr/ [In Korean]
26. Lee KS (2017). Achievements and Challeng-es of 40th Anniversary Health Insurance. Health Policy and Management, 27(2): 104. [In Korean]
27. Korean Brain Stimulation Society (2022). Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treat-ment Guidelines: A major depressive disorder, Seongnam-si: Korean Brain Stimulation Society: 2-3. [Korean Book]
28. Heo ES, Lee YH, Shim JW (2020). Why Ethics is: A Landscape of Modern AI Ethics Debate, Its Features and Limita-tions. Human Beings, Environment and Their Future, 24: 166. [In Korean]
Files
IssueVol 51 No 9 (2022) QRcode
SectionReview Article(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v51i9.10547
Keywords
Electroceuticals Bioelectronic medicine Neuroethics Neurophilosopy

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Park S- hun, Shim J. Measures to Use Electroceuticals and Secure Social Reliability in Korea: A Narrative Review. Iran J Public Health. 2022;51(9):1916-1924.