Review Article

Expanded Orientation of Urban Public Health Policy in the Climate Change Era: Response to and Prevention of Heat Wave in Paris and Seoul: A Brief Review

Abstract

The policies of response to and prevention of heat waves in France in 2003 and in South Korea in 2018 were compared and reviewed to see how public health policy orientation was being expanded in connection with urban and social policies. The statistics of the patients with heat illness and resulted death in France in 2003 and South Korea in 2018 were analyzed. The results and limitations of the French and Korean responses to heat waves were compared and discussed. The heat wave in France in 2003 caused an excess death of 14,802. The 2018 heat wave in South Korea resulted in 4,526 cases of heat illness and 48 deaths. France’s National Heat wave Plan established in 2004 introduced the warning system and strengthened support for the vulnerable. The heat wave in South Korea in 2018 revealed the success and limitations of the national measures that have been gradually implemented since the mid-2000s. Both France and South Korea are making efforts in preventing heat illness and managing health risk through the warning systems, providing public and social support for the vulnerable, and expanding urban infrastructure. Paris puts priority on the long-term prevention of heat wave, in the wider context of climate change response, while Seoul shows a relatively strong point in immediate infrastructural expansion. In order to respond to the climate crisis and the following health risk, public health policies need to be contrived with deeper connection with urban social policies for sustainable development.

1. IPCC (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the In-tergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds)]. Geneva, IPCC.
2. Frich P, Alexander LV, Della-Marta P, et al (2002). Observed coherent changes in climatic extremes during the second half of the twentieth century. Climate Research, 19: 193–212.
3. Besancenot JP (2002). Vagues de chaleur et mortalité dans les grandes aggloméra-tions urbaines. Environnement, Risques et Santé, 4-1: 229-240. [Article in French].
4. Klinenberg E (2002). Heat wave: A Social Au-topsy of Disaster in Chicago. Chicago, Chica-go University Press.
5. Hémon D, Jougla E (2003). Surmortalité liée à la canicule d'août 2003. Rapport d’étape. Estimation de la Surmortalité et Princi-pales Caractéristiques épidémiologiques. Paris, Inserm. [Document in French].
6. World Meteorological Organization (2019). WMO Statement on the state of the global climate in 2018. https://library.wmo.int/doc_num.php?explnum_id=5789
7. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2019). Annual Report on the Notified Patients with Heat-related illness in Korea. [Document in Korean].
8. Lagadec P (2004). Understanding the French 2003 Heat Wave Experience: Be-yond the heat, a Multi-Layered Challenge. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 12-4: 160-169.
9. Poumadère M, Mays C, Le Mer S, Blong R (2005). The 2003 Heat Wave in France: Dangerous Climate Change Here and Now. Risk Analysis, 25-6: 1483-1494.
10. Yang HJ, Yoon HY (2019). Measuring the Efficiency of Heat-wave Action Programs in Urban Environments: Using Heat-related Illness Data in Seoul, South Korea. Journal of the Korean Urban Management Asso-ciation, 32-1: 31-45. [Article in Korean].
11. Kovats RS, Kristie LE (2006). Heat waves and public health in Europe. Eur J Public Health, 16-6: 592-599.
12. Assemblée Nationale. Jacquat D (2003). Rapport d’information sur la crise sani-taire et sociale déclenchée par la canicule. [Document in French].
13. Hémon D, Jougla E (2004). Surmortalité liée à la canicule d'août 2003. Rapport remis au Ministre de la Santé et de la Protection Sociale. Paris, Inserm. [Document in French].
14. Ministère de la santé et de la protection so-ciale, Ministre déléguée aux personnes âgées (May 2004). Plan National Canic-ule(PNC). Actions nationales et locales à mettre en oeuvre par les pouvoirs public afin de prévenir et réduire les conséquences sanitaires d’une canicule (version du 31 mai 2004). [Document in French].
15. Ministère des affaires sociales et de la Santé (2013). Plan National Canicule 2013. [Document in French].
16. Mairie de Paris (2007). Plan Climat de Paris. Plan de lutte contre le réchauffement cli-matique. [Document in French].
17. Ville de Paris (2018). Plan Climat de Paris. Vers une ville neutre en carbone, 100% énergies renouvelables, résiliente, juste et inclusive. [Document in French].
18. Related Ministries Joint (2018). Comprehen-sive measures for the heat wave in 2018. [Document in Korean].
19. Cho HM, Lee YH (2018). Measures to im-prove Seoul’s ability to respond to heat waves. The Seoul Institute Policy Report 257. [Document in Korean].
20. Seoul Metropolitan Government (2017). Seoul Comprehensive Plan for Response to Climate Change (2017~2021). [Docu-ment in Korean].
Files
IssueVol 51 No 7 (2022) QRcode
SectionReview Article(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v51i7.10080
Keywords
Public health Heat illness Heat wave Climate change Urban sustainable development

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Hong Y-J, Min Y-K, Lee S, Choi S. Expanded Orientation of Urban Public Health Policy in the Climate Change Era: Response to and Prevention of Heat Wave in Paris and Seoul: A Brief Review. Iran J Public Health. 2022;51(7):1461-1468.