Appearance of “Mental Hygiene” in Japan's Theory of Prenatal Care at the Beginning of the 20th Century- The Fusion of Public Hygiene and Eugenics: A Book Review
Abstract
The Motherhood Protection Act (1996), which corresponds to modern family health in Japan, was enacted based on the Eugenics Protection Law (1948) for the protection of national eugenics. This leads us to the question of how maternal health and eugenics began to merge in Japan. Answer of this will elucidate the characteristics of family health in Japan and historical background. Maternal health and eugenics began to be fused in Japan in the early 20th century. In this paper, we examined Taikyō, which is the source of this fusion. This book was widely disseminated to the public. An educational book influenced the Japanese women’s movement. Taikyō argued that from the standpoint of public health, responsibility for prenatal care should be extended to the husband, family, society and the nation. It emphasized that “mental hygiene” is necessary to produce a genetically good child, and that spouse selection is important. Books on prenatal care published in the first half of the 20th century, following Taikyō’s description of prenatal care as a form of eugenics. The National Eugenic Act enacted to protect national hygiene inspired the classification of the Japanese as a chosen nation. The theory of prenatal care, which was created from the combination of public hygiene and eugenics, provided a justification for the National Eugenic Act, and this still serves as the basis for the Eugenics Protection Law and Motherhood Protection Act. It provides the “scientific basis” for recognizing that “unsanitary” and “disability” are bad.
2. Goto Shinpei (1889). Principles of National Sanitation. Sōzō shuppan, Tōkyō, pp.83-100. (In Japanese).
3. Nagai Hisomu (1915). The theory of racial improvement. Jinsei, 11(7): 247. (In Japa-nese).
4. Unno Kōtoku (1910). Theory for Remodeling the Japanese Race, Fuzambo, Tōkyō. (In Japa-nese).
5. Kato Hirofumi (1996). Social History of Wel-fare Human View-Through Eugenic Thought and Misconduct・Psychosis, Akihiro shobō, Tōkyō, pp.374-425. (In Japanese).
6. Tanaka Masato (1957). Examination of pre-natal care. Japanese Educational Research Association. Educational Studies in Japan, 24: 19-35. (In Japanese).
7. Nicole Richardson (2011). Translating Taijiao: Modern Metaphors and International Eclecticism in Song Jiazhao’s Translation of Shimoda Jirō’s Taikyō, Academia Sinica Institute of Modern History. Research on the History of Modern Chinese Women, 19: 255-288.
8. Shimoda Jiro (1913). Taikyō, Jitsugyō no Ni-honsha, Tōkyō. (In Japanese).
9. Miyano Makiko (2016). Motherhood and happiness. Nanzan University Institute of Social Ethics, Society and Ethics, 31: 19~33. (In Japanese).
10. Kim Byeongjin (2021). Life-centrism and Eugenics in the Modern Japanese Wom-en’s Movement. Ewha Institute for the Humanities. Trans-Humanities, 29: 55~77. (In Korean).
11. Karasawa Tomitaro ed. (1984). The Illustrated Educational Biographical Dictionary, Gyōsei shuppan, Tōkyō, pp.945-949. (In Japa-nese)
12. The original title of this book is Die Nor-malen Schwankungen Der Seelentha Åtigkeiten by Jacopo Finzi and Ernst Jentsch (1900).
13. The original title of this book is Berufswahl und Nervenleiden by August Hoffmann (1904).
14. The original title of this book is Das Nerven-system und die Schädlichkeiten des täglichen Le-bens by Paul Schuster (1908).
15. The original title of this book is Hygiene der Nerven und des Geistes by Auguste Forel (1903).
16. The growth of the brain was written by Henry Donaldson in 1898, and Dynamic Factors in Education was published in 1908 by Mi-chael O'Shea.
17. The examples of prenatal care referred to in these chapters included less learning (1187) in China, Inagogusa (1690), Joka Kouyou (1859) and Haha to ko (Mother and Child, 1909) in Japan, Ideal Motherhood by Minnie Skinner Davis, Fraulein von Scuderi by E. T. A. Hoffmann, and An Imaginative Woman by Thomas Hardy.
18. Shimoda Jiro (1913). Taikyō, Jitsugyō no Nihonsha, Tōkyō. Chapters 11 and 12. (In Japanese).
19. Tanaka Masato (1957). Examination of pre-natal care. Japanese Educational Research Association. Educational Studies in Japan, 24: 19-35. (In Japanese).
20. Nakamura Makio ed. (2004). Eugenics and peo-ple with disabilities, Akashishoten, Tōkyō, pp.23; Stephen Trombley (2000). History of eugenic thought, Akashishoten, Tōkyō, pp.112-300．(In Japanese).
21. Aruga Natsuki (1998). Establishment and development of gender society, challenge from feminism. Iwanami Lecture in World History, Iwanami Shoten, Tōkyō, pp.292-309. (in Japanese)
22. Lee Kyung-hye (1998). Current status and alternatives of maternal and child health care in Korea. Korean Parent-Child Health Journal, 1(1): 98-114. (in Korean).
23. Yamazaki Kiyoko ed. (2008). Ethics of Life2: Beyond the Age of Eugenics, Kyushu Univer-sity Press, Fukuoka, pp.255-256. (In Japa-nese).
24. Fukuzawa Yukichi (1897). Race Improve-ment (Nihon jinshu kairyōron). One hun-dred discourses of Fukuzawa, Jijishinpōsha, Tōkyō. (In Japanese).
25. Tanaka Satoshi (1994). Desire inherent in a hy-giene exhibition, Seikyūsha, Tōkyō. (In Japa-nese).
26. Matsubara Yōko (2003). The sins committed by the Eugenic Protection Act: Testimony of those deprived of having children, Gendai Shokan, Tōkyō, p.105. (In Japanese).
27. Shin Ok-ju (2019). Meaning of the abortion inconsistency decision and the direction of constitutional legislative reform. Gender Review, 53: 26-41. (In Korean).
28. Choi Gyu-jin (2017). Research Community Health and Alternatives. Medical care and so-ciety Medical and Society, 8: 262-273. (In Korean).
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 51 No 1 (2022) | |
| Section | Review Article(s) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v51i1.8291 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Public health Eugenics Prenatal care Mental hygiene Japan | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
