Impact of Targeted Subsidies Reform on Household Nutrition: Lessons Learned from Iran
,
Abstract
Background: In 2010, Iran became the first major oil-exporting country to reduce substantially implicit energy subsidies by increasing domestic energy and agricultural prices by up to 20 times. The current research aims to evaluate the profound impact of the countywide implementation of this targeted subsidy reform (TSR) on the consumption patterns of households in Iran, specifically in relation to the consumption of healthy food commodities.
Methods: This study employed a robust approach to examine the impact of the TSR on household food consumption, as a natural experiment, using pooled cross-section data from the Household Income and Expenditure Survey (HIES) spanning the years 1992 to 2019. The analysis was based on a comprehensive interpretation of survey data, which served as the primary source for analysis. The estimation procedure utilized an interrupted time series (ITS) model to capture the parameters associated with food consumption.
Results: The findings revealed a substantial increase in household expenditures on food immediately following the policy intervention, with an impressive rise of 823 thousand Rials (equivalent to approximately $6.36 based on the floating exchange rate in 2019). Furthermore, the results strongly indicate a significant annual upward trend in total monthly food expenditures per adult person, surpassing the pre-intervention trend by 441 thousand Rials (approximately $3.40) (P=0.044, CI=[12.86, 1016.81]). Moreover, the implementation of the policy led to an annual per capita increase in fruit consumption by 1.02 grams per day (P=0.225, CI=[-0.68; 2.72]).
Conclusion: This study shows that the initial positive effects of the TSR have gradually been eroded by inflation in subsequent years. This experience can serve as a lesson for all countries that TSR should be accompanied by other measures, such as poverty alleviation interventions, in order to achieve desired long-term results.
2. Thow AM, Fanzo J, Negin J (2016). A sys-tematic review of the effect of remit-tances on diet and nutrition. Food Nutr Bull, 37:42-64.
3. Jensen RT, Miller NH (2011). Do consumer price subsidies really improve nutrition? Rev Econ Stat, 93:1205-23.
4. Breton M, Mirzapour H (2016). Welfare implication of reforming energy con-sumption subsidies. Energy policy, 98:232-40.
5. Basurto MP, Dupas P, Robinson J (2020). Decentralization and efficiency of sub-sidy targeting: Evidence from chiefs in rural Malawi. J Public Econ, 185:104047.
6. Doshmangir L, Doshmangir P, Abolhas-sani N, et al (2015). Effects of targeted subsidies policy on health behavior in Iranian households: a qualitative study. Iran J Public Health, 44:570-9.
7. Asfaw S, Carraro A, Davis B, et al (2017). Cash transfer programmes for manag-ing climate risk: Evidence from a ran-domized experiment in Zambia. e Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Technical Report. 10.13140/RG.2.2.33167.59048.
8. Sabates-Wheeler R, Devereux S (2010). Cash transfers and high food prices: Explaining outcomes on Ethiopia’s Pro-ductive Safety Net Programme. Food Poli-cy, 35:274-85.
9. Guillaume, D., Zytek, R., & Farzin, M.R. (2011). Iran - The Chronicles of the Sub-sidy Reform. IMF Working Paper, Mid-dle East and Central Asia Department. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2011/wp11167.pdf (Last access: 17 May 2023)
10. Tabatabai H (2012). From price subsidies to basic income: The Iran model and its lessons. Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee, in: Karl Widerquist & Mi-chael W. Howard (ed.), Exporting the Alaska Model, pages 17-32, Palgrave Macmillan.
11. Ivanova L, Dimitrov P, Ovcharova D, et al (2006). Economic transition and house-hold food consumption: a study of Bul-garia from 1985 to 2002. Econ Hum Biol, 4:383-97.
12. Khosravi A, Marzban H, Ghaderi J, Ros-tamzadeh P (2020). Optimal Monetary Policy in a Dual Exchange Rate Regime. Iran J Econ Stud, 9: 293-317.
13. Penfold RB, Zhang F (2013). Use of inter-rupted time series analysis in evaluating health care quality improvements. Acad Pediatr, 13(6 Suppl):S38-44.
14. Hategeka C, Ruton H, Karamouzian M, et al (2020). Use of interrupted time series methods in the evaluation of health sys-tem quality improvement interventions: a methodological systematic review. BMJ Glob Health, 5:e003567.
15. Linden A (2015). Conducting interrupted time-series analysis for single-and mul-tiple-group comparisons. Stata J, 15:480-500.
16. Greene WH (2003). Econometric analysis: Pearson Education India.
17. Monfared SS, Akın F (2017). The relation-ship between exchage rates and infla-tion: The case of iran Eur J Sustain Dev, 6:329.
18. Kane EJ (1999). Housing Finance GSEs: Who Gets the Subsidy? J Financial Serv Res, 15:197-209.
19. Schubert B, Slater R (2006). Social cash transfers in low‐income African coun-tries: Conditional or unconditional? Dev Policy Rev.; 24:571-8.
20. Wagner AK, Soumerai SB, Zhang F, et al (2002). Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medi-cation use research. J Clin Pharm Ther, 27:299-309.
21. Herman DR, Harrison GG, Afifi AA, et al (2008). Effect of a targeted subsidy on intake of fruits and vegetables among low-income women in the Special Sup-plemental Nutrition Program for Wom-en, Infants, and Children. Am J Public Health, 98:98-105.
22. Hamzehi M, Anabestani A, Javan J (2022). Impact of Targeted Subsidies Imple-mentation on Poverty and Instability of Rural Household Economy in Iran (Case study: Villages of Neishabour county). Journal of Regional Planning, 12:83-108.
23. Harris K (2010). The politics of subsidy re-form in Iran. Middle East Report, 36-9.
24. Tiwari S, Daidone S, Ruvalcaba MA, et al (2016). Impact of cash transfer programs on food security and nutrition in sub-Saharan Africa: A cross-country analysis. Glob Food Sec, 11:72-83.
25. Afesorgbor S (2020). Sanctioned to Starve? The impact of economic sanctions on food security in targeted states. Forthcom-ing as a chapter in the Research Handbook on Economic Sanctions, Edward Elgar Publish-ing, UK.
26. Hejazi J, Emamgholipour S (2020). The ef-fects of the re-imposition of US sanc-tions on food security in Iran. Int J Health Policy Manag, 11(5):651-657.
27. Maghsoudi N, Ardahaey FT (2012). Target-ing subsidies considering the applied models in Iran. International Journal of Business and Social Science, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2457392
28. Ruel MT, Alderman H, Maternal, et al (2013). Nutrition-sensitive interventions and programmes: how can they help to accelerate progress in improving mater-nal and child nutrition? Lancet, 382:536-51.
29. Biglan A, Ary D, Wagenaar AC (2000). The value of interrupted time-series experi-ments for community intervention re-search. Prev Sci, 1:31-49.
30. Lopez Bernal JA, Gasparrini A, Artundo CM, et al (2013). The effect of the late 2000s financial crisis on suicides in Spain: an interrupted time-series analy-sis. Eur J Public Health, 23:732-6.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 52 No 7 (2023) | |
| Section | Original Article(s) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v52i7.13253 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Health policy Food security Universal health coverage Interrupted time series analysis Iran | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
