Review Article

Disaster Preparedness and Mitigation in Indonesia: A Narrative Review


Background: The tectonic activities at the meeting points of three large plates make Indonesia a high-risk disaster-prone area. Nevertheless, disaster risk reduction efforts in various regions of Indonesia are still lacking, in terms of both knowledge and the ability to analyze disaster risks. This study examines the implementation of disaster preparedness and mitigation in Indonesia.

Methods: The method used in this study was narrative review. The authors collected the articles through searching for 3 data sources from 2016–2019 using Google Scholar, iSeek, and Microsoft Academic. Content analysis of all information to obtain the thematic phenomena of this study completed the methodological approach.

Results: After applying the exclusion criteria and removing duplicates, six studies remained that focused on disaster mitigation in remote areas of Indonesia. Implementation of regulation and policy framework in disaster management is not yet optimal. Disaster preparedness and mitigation is characterized by the low utilization of technology and information related to the disaster, and various obstacles in the process of evacuation and transportation. Promoting local wisdom and enhancing it through integrating science can increase disaster resilience.

Conclusion: The existence of a disaster-resilient village is very influential in community preparedness in dealing with disasters and other emergencies. This study provides some recommendations for disaster risk reduction: a) strengthening policies related to evacuation procedures in the health sector by local government, b) integrating transportation modes in remote areas, c) enhancing all parties with education and training, d) establishing community-based information systems; and e) strengthening the disaster resilience of villages.

1. National Disaster Management Agency Republic of Indonesia (2016). Disasters risk of Indonesia. Available from:
2. National Disaster Management Agency Republic of Indonesia (2019). Indonesian disaster data 2009-2019. Available from:
3. Rahma A (2018). Implementation of Disas-ter Risk Reduction program (DRR) through formal education. J Varidika, 30(1):1–11.
4. Indonesian Government (2007). Law number 24 Year 2007 on Disaster Management.
5. Health Disaster (2014). United Nations Sec-retariat for International Strategy for Dis-aster Reduction (UNISDR) criticism of weak natural disaster prevention and pro-tection policies in Indonesia. Available from:
6. Red Cross Indonesia, International Federa-tion of Red Cross and Red Crescent (2016). Strengthening law and Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) in Indonesia: as-sessment report based on checklist. Available from:
7. Putra DI, Matsuyuki M (2019). Disaster management following decentralization in Indonesia: regulation, institutional estab-lishment, planning, and budgeting. J Dis-aster Res,14(1):173–87.
8. Putra DI, Matsuyuki M (2020). The disaster-management capabilities of local gov-ernments: a case study in Indonesia. J Disaster Res, 15(4):471–80.
9. Kuwado, FJ (2019). Jokowi asks for educa-tion and disaster mitigation to be includ-ed in the education curriculum. Kompas. Available from:
10. Tasic J, Amir S (2016). Informational capital and disaster resilience: the case of Jalin Merapi. Disaster Prev Manag, 25(3):395–411.
11. Ai F, Comfort LK, Znati T (2015). A dy-namic decision support system based on geographical information and mobile so-cial networks: a model for tsunami risk mitigation in Padang, Indonesia. Saf Sci, 90:62–74.
12. Ismail N, Suwannapong N, Howteerakul N, Tipayamongkholgul M, Apinuntavech S (2016). Assessing disaster preparedness and mental health of community mem-bers in Aceh, Indonesia: a community-based, descriptive household survey of a national program. Rural Remote Health, 16(4):3788.
13. Zulfadrim Z, Toyoda Y, Kanegae H (2018). The implementation of local wisdom in reducing natural disaster risk: a case study from West Sumatera. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, 106(1):012008.
14. Hanifa L, Sadat A, Mahmuda D, Nazar A, Jasiyah R, Wijaya RS, et al (2019). Han-dling disaster risks with the community-based approach. IOP Conf Ser Earth Envi-ron Sci, 235(1): 012034.
15. Dewanti DS, Ayuwat D, Yongvanit S (2019). Household disaster management capaci-ties in disaster prone II area of Mt. Slamet. Jàmbá - Journal of Disaster Risk Stud-ies, 11(1):1-7.
16. Lavigne F, De Coster B, Juvin N, et al (2008). People’s behaviour in the face of volcanic hazards: perspectives from java-nese communities, Indonesia. J Volcanol Geotherm Res, 172(3–4):273–87.
17. Sagala S, Okada N, Paton D (2009). Model-ing the social resilience of mountain communities under volcanic risks: a case study of Mt. Merapi. Conf Proc - IEEE Int Conf Syst Man Cybern, 1935–40.
18. Dove MR (2008). Perception of volcanic eruption as agent of change on Merapi volcano, Central Java. J Volcanol Geotherm Res, 172(3–4):329–37.
19. Schlehe J (2008). Cultural politics of natural disasters: discourses on volcanic erup-tions in Indonesia. In: Culture and the Changing Environment.
20. Schlehe J (1996). Reinterpretations of mysti-cal traditions: explanations of a volcanic eruption in Java. Anthropos, 91(4–6):391–409.
21. Rahman HA (2014). An overview of envi-ronmental disaster in Malaysia and pre-paredness strategies. Iran J Public Health, 43(3):17–24.
22. Pourhosseini SS, Ardalan A, Mehrolhassani MH (2015). Key aspects of providing healthcare services in disaster response stage. Iran J Public Health, 44(1):111–8.
23. Kaneda Y (2017). Resilience science for a re-silience society in Seismogenic and Tsu-namigenic countries. J Disaster Res, 12(4):712–21.
IssueVol 50 No 8 (2021) QRcode
SectionReview Article(s)
Coastal area Disaster Mitigation Remote area Preparedness

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Ayuningtyas D, Windiarti S, Hadi M, Fasrini U, Barinda S. Disaster Preparedness and Mitigation in Indonesia: A Narrative Review. Iran J Public Health. 2021;50(8):1536-1546.