Vaccination Refusal Debate on Social Media in Turkey: A Content Analysis of the Comments on Instagram Blogs
,
Abstract
Background: This study was conducted to identify the reasons for vaccine refusal of individuals/parents by analyzing the comments on the pages screened with the keyword vaccine refusal on social media.
Methods: Qualitative and quantitative methods were used in the study. Within the scope of the study, 7 pages, 216 posts and 3446 comments found with the keyword #vaccine refusal were analyzed. The comments obtained within the scope of the study were evaluated using content analysis and theme analysis methods. The study data were collected between Sep 1st and 11th, 2020.
Results: The comments on vaccine refusal were found to increase in 2018 and 2019, especially in September, October, November, and December. The reasons for vaccine refusal were grouped under 2 themes as individual reasons and vaccine-related reasons as a result of the analysis of the comments. The most commonly used word in the text analysis, consisting of 10,428 words mentioned in the posts, was found to be vaccine (3.2%).
Conclusion: Individuals/parents refuse vaccination for reasons such as distrust of vaccine content, disbelief in the need for vaccines, distrust of pharmaceutical companies, previous experiences, like-minded people/platforms, religious reasons, and preference for alternative health care approaches.
2. Hidayati H, Istiqomah AF. Social media as a new gateway of the anti-vaccine move-ment ın İndonesai. In Proceeding ASEAN Youth Conference (serial online) 2019 (cited 2020 Apr 8).
3. Jenkins MC, Moreno MA (2020). Vaccina-tion Discussion among Parents on Social Media: A Content Analysis of Comments on Parenting Blogs. J Health Commun, 25(3):232-42.
4. Aquino F, Donzelli G, De Franco E, et al (2017). The web and public confidence in MMR vaccination in Italy. Vaccine, 35(35 Pt B):4494-4498.
5. Gargiulo F, Cafiero F, Guille-Escuret P, et al (2020). Asymmetric participation of de-fenders and critics of vaccines to debates on french-speaking twitter. Sci Rep, 10(1):6599.
6. Dunn AG, Leask J, Zhou X, et al (2015). Associations between exposure to and expression of negative opinions about human papillomavirus vaccines on social media: an observational study. J Med In-ternet Res, 17(6):e144.
7. Kim S, Yalcin OF, Bestvater SE, et al (2020). The Effects of an Informational Inter-vention on Attention to Anti-Vaccination Content on YouTube. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and So-cial Media, 14:949-53.
8. Meadows CZ, Tang L, Liu W (2019). Twit-ter message types, health beliefs, and vac-cine attitudes during the 2015 measles outbreak in California. Am J Infect Control, 47(11):1314-8.
9. Bradshaw AS, Shelton SS, Wollney E, et al (2021). Pro-Vaxxers Get Out: Anti-Vaccination Advocates Influence Unde-cided First-Time, Pregnant, and New Mothers on Facebook. Health Commun, 36(6):693-702.
10. Steffens MS, Dunn AG, Wiley KE, Leask J (2019). How organisations promoting vaccination respond to misinformation on social media: a qualitative investigation. BMC Public Health, 19(1):1348.
11. Larson HJ, Jarrett C, Schulz WS, et al (2015). Measuring vaccine hesitancy: the devel-opment of a survey tool. Vaccine, 33(34):4165-75.
12. World Health Organization. Progress and Challenges with Achieving Universal Immunization Coverage (serial online) 2020 (cited 2020 Apr 8). Available form: https://www.who.int/immunization/monitoring_surveillance/who-immuniz.pdf?ua=1
13. Hara N, Sanfilippo MR (2016). Co-constructing controversy: Content analy-sis of collaborative knowledge negotia-tion in online communities. Inf Commun Soc, 19(11):1587-1604.
14. Stecula DA, Kuru O, Jamieson KH (2020). How trust in experts and media use affect acceptance of common anti-vaccination claims. HKS Misinformation Review, 1(1):1-11.
15. Żuk P, Żuk P (2020). Right-wing populism in Poland and anti-vaccine myths on YouTube: Political and cultural threats to public health. Glob Public Health, 15(6):790-804.
16. Karvonen S, Wedel J (2019). Perceptions concerning the MMR Vaccine on a Swe-dish Internet Platform. Soc Med Tidskr, 4:629-38.
17. Mahajan R, Romine W, Miller M, Banerjee T (2019). Analyzing Public Outlook towards Vaccination using Twitter. IEEE Interna-tional Conference on Big Data, 2763-72.
18. Wojnar DM, Swanson KM (2007). Phe-nomenology: an exploration. J Holist Nurs, 25(3):172-80.
19. Braun V, Clarke V (2013). Successful qualita-tive research: A practical guide for begin-ners. London: Sage.
20. Braun V, Clarke V (2014). What can “the-matic analysis” offer health and well be-ing researchers? Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being, 9:26152.
21. Rumetta J, Abdul-Hadi H, Lee YK (2020). A qualitative study on parents’ reasons and recommendations for childhood vaccina-tion refusal in Malaysia. J Infect Public Health, 13(2):199-203.
22. Majid U, Ahmad M (2020). The factors that promote vaccine hesitancy, rejection, or delay in parents. Qual Health Res, 30(11):1762-76.
23. Chirumbolo S, Bjørklund G (2019). Evalua-tion of Childhood Vaccine Refusal and Hesitancy Intentions in Turkey: Corre-spondence. Indian J Pediatr, 86(3):315-7.
24. Brown KF, Long SJ, Ramsay M, et al (2012). UK parents’ decision-making about mea-sles–mumps–rubella (MMR) vaccine 10 years after the MMR-autism controversy: A qualitative analysis. Vaccine, 30(10):1855-64.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 51 No 3 (2022) | |
| Section | Original Article(s) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v51i3.8938 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Child Parent Qualitative research Social media Vaccine Vaccine refusal | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
