Mapping the Intellectual Structure of Medical Sociology: A Co-Word Analysis
Abstract
Background: Medical sociology is concerned with the relationship between social factors and health, and with the application of sociological theory and research techniques to questions related to health and the health care system. Considering the wide range of studies in the field that each examined different aspects, to promote health in community, bibliometrics analysis in this area is felt.
Methods: In this descriptive-analytical study with a scientometric approach, the data about “medical sociology” were retrieved from PubMed in MEDINE format, including 1226 records over the period 1945-2018. By using Co-word analysis, clustering methods, and strategic diagram with the help of SPSS, UcInet 6 software the data were analyzed.
Results: The keyword “Attitude to Health” and two pairs of frequently used keywords, namely “Power (Psychology)*Professional Autonomy” were the most frequent in medical sociology. The results shaped the concepts of medical sociology in 7 clusters. The clusters “Attitude of health personnel”, “Health Policy” and “Sociology of Medical Education” are topics that may be emerging or disappearing. The “Physicians", "Models of Social Determinants of Health" and "medical philosophy" are immature clusters.
Conclusion: This research used co-word networks that indicate the important links between keywords of research areas. Considering the frequency of keywords along with the clusters obtained, it seems that the most research approach was seen on the medical aspect rather than the sociological aspect. Despite the importance of sociological aspects such as social rooting of disease, sociability, medicine as a social institution and etiological studies, these subjects have not been sufficiently considered.
2. He Q (1999). Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends, 48: 133–159.
3. Ravikumar S, Agrahari A, Singh SN (2015). Mapping the intellectual structure of sci-entometrics: A co-word analysis of the journal Scientometrics (2005-2010). Scien-tometrics, 102(1): 929-955.
4. Chen X, Chen J, Wu D, et al (2016). Map-ping the research trends by co-word analysis based on keywords from funded project. Procedia Computer Science, 1(91): 547-555.
5. Yang A, Lv Q, Chen F, et al (2019). Identifi-cation of recent trends in research on vit-amin D: A quantitative and co-word anal-ysis. Med Sci Monit, 25: 643-55.
6. Moral-Munoz JA, Carballo-Costa L, Herre-ra-Viedma E, et al (2019). Production trends, collaboration, and main topics of the integrative and complementary on-cology research area: A bibliometric anal-ysis. Integr Cancer Ther, 18: 1534735419846401.
7. Shen L, Wang S, Dai W, et al (2019). Detect-ing the interdisciplinary nature and topic hotspots of robotics in surgery: social network analysis and bibliometric study. J Med Internet Res, 21(3): e12625.
8. Lu K, Yu S, Sun D, et al (2018). Scientomet-ric analysis of SIRT6 studies. Med Sci Monit, 24: 8357-8371.
9. Zhao F, Shi B, Liu R, et al (2018). Theme trends and knowledge structure on cho-roidal neovascularization: A quantitative and co-word analysis. BMC Ophthalmol, 18(1): 86.
10. Lu K, Yu S, Yu M, et al (2018). Bibliometric analysis of tumor immunotherapy stud-ies. Med Sci Monit, 24: 3405-3414.
11. Zhang W, Wang YB, Zhang XZ, et al (2017). The study of hot spots on hepati-tis B dissertation based on co-word anal-ysis in China. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 245: 1293.
12. Makkizadeh F, Bigdeloo E (2019). Intellectu-al structure of knowledge in Andrology field (2008 to 2017): A Co-word analysis. Int J Reprod BioMed, 17: 1–13.
13. Makkizadeh F (2019). Intellectual structure of knowledge in nanomedicine field (2009 to 2018): A Co-Word Analysis. Nanomedi-cine Research Journal, 4(2): 101-110.
14. Wang Z, Deng Z, Wu X (2019). Status Quo of Professional–Patient Relations in the Internet Era: Bibliometric and Co-Word Analyses. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 16(7): 1183.
15. Leung X, Sun J, Bai B (2017). Bibliometrics of social media research: A co-citation and co-word analysis. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 66: 35–45.
16. Makkizadeh F, Sa’adat F (2017). Bibliometric and thematic analysis of articles in the field of infertility (2011-2015). Int JReprod BioMed, 15(11): 719–728.
17. Soheili F, Shabani A, Khasseh AA (2017). Intellectual structure of knowledge in In-formation Behavior: A Co-Word Analy-sis. Human Information Interaction, 4: 21–36.
18. Makkizadeh F (2020). An Analysis of Laser Researches in Biomedicine Literature with a Scientometric Approach. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), 18(2):189-201.
19. Boudry C, Denion E, Mortemousque B, et al (2016). Trends and topics in eye dis-ease research in PubMed from 2010 to 2014. Peer J, 4, e1557.
20. Hu CP, Hu JM, Deng SL, et al (2013). A co-word analysis of library and information science in China. Scientometrics, 97(2): 369-82.
21. Shen L, Xiong B, Hu J (2017). Research Sta-tus, Hotspots and Trends for Infor-mation Behavior in China Using Biblio-metric and Co-Word Analysis. J Doc, 73: 618-633.
22. Melcer E, Nguyen T.H.D, Chen Z, et al (2015). Game sresearch today: Analyzing the academic landscape 2000-2014. In: Proceed-ings of the 10th. International Confer-ence on the Foundations of Digital Games, At Pacific Grove, CA, USA 2015.
23. Liu Y, Goncalves J, Ferreira D, et al (2014). Identity crisis of ubicomp? Mapping 15 years of the field's development and paradigm change. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Interna-tional Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing 2014 Sep 13 (pp. 75-86).
24. Sweileh WM, AbuTaha AS, Sawalha AF, et al (2016). Bibliometric analysis of worldwide publications on multi-, extensively, and totally drug–resistant tuberculosis (2006–2015). Multidiscip Respir Med, 11:45.
25. Sweileh WM, Al-Jabi SW, Sawalha AF, et al (2016). Bibliometric profile of the global scientific research on autism spectrum disorders. Springerplus, 5(1):1480.
26. Masoud Nia, E (2014). An Introduction to Medical Sociology. Tehran: University of Tehran.
27. Hamzah SR, Suandi T, Ismail M, et al (2019). Association of the personal factors of culture, attitude and motivation with health behavior among adolescents in Malaysia. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 24(2): 149-59.
28. Woollard B, Boelen C (2012). Seeking im-pact of medical schools on health: meet-ing the challenges of social accountability. Med Educ, 46(1):21-7.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 51 No 5 (2022) | |
| Section | Original Article(s) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v51i5.9431 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Medical sociology Bibliometrics Co-word analysis | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
