Economic Evaluation of Health Interventions: A Critical Review
Abstract
Background: Economic evaluation is used for the optimal allocation of resources in the health sector. While a large number of economic evaluation studies have been conducted, there is less critical review of these studies. We critically examined the economic evaluation studies of preventive health interventions.
Methods: The study was carried out using critical review method. Seven databases (i.e., PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, Science Direct, Scopus, Springer Link, and Elsevier) were searched to find articles on economic evaluation of health interventions published from 1985 to 2018. In addition, the references of retrieved studies were hand screened for articles that were not indexed in these databases. Finally, 206 articles, including 33 cost- benefit analysis, 146 cost- effectiveness analysis, and 27 cost- utility analysis were included in this study. These studies were critically evaluated using a checklist of 11 criteria.
Results: Only 20% of the studies met all the methodological criteria of health economic evaluation. The cost perspective, costs type, cost data source, and cost measurement were not explained and discussed in 17%, 20%, 5%, and 33% of studies respectively. Outcome data sources and outcome valuation method were only mentioned in 53% and 69% of studies. The sensitivity analysis and results’ generalizability were not reported in 16% and 46% of studies.
Conclusion: The quality of economic evaluation studies is low, and it can be misleading if resource allocation decisions are made using this evidence. Authors should use valid protocols to conduct and report economic evaluation studies, and journals’ editors should use valid checklists to evaluate these articles.
2. Esfahani P, Mosadeghrad AM, Akbarisari A (2018). The success of strategic planning in health care organizations of Iran. Int J Health Care Qual Assur, 31 (6): 563-574.
3. Mosadeghrad AM, Ferlie E(2016). Total quality management in healthcare. In Management Innovations for Healthcare Organizations. Routledge, pp.: 404-422.
4. Keliddar I, Mosadeghrad AM, Jafari M (2017). Rationing in health systems: A critical review. Med J Islam Repub Iran, 31 (1): 271-277.
5. Catalá-López F, García-Altés A, Álvarez-Martín E, Gènova-Maleras R, Morant-Ginestar C, Parada A (2011). Burden of disease and economic evaluation of healthcare interventions: are we investigating what really matters?. BMC Health Serv Res, 11(1):75.
6. Mosadeghrad A, Jaafaripooyan E, Zamandi M (2020). Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Health Interventions: A Critical Review. J Sch Public Health Inst Public Health Res, 18 (1):29-50.
7. Murray CJ, Evans DB, Acharya A, Baltussen RM (2000). Development of WHO guidelines on generalized cost‐effectiveness analysis. Health Econ,9(3):235-51.
8. Walker D, Fox‐Rushby JA (2000). Economic evaluation of communicable disease interventions in developing countries: a critical review of the published literature. Health Econ,9(8):681-98.
9. Evans DB, Hurley SF (1995). The application of economic evaluation techniques in the health sector: the state of the art. J Int Dev, 7(3):503-24.
10. Mason J, Drummond M(1995). The DH register of cost-effectiveness studies: content and quality. Health Trends, 27(2):50-6.
11. Udvarhelyi IS, Colditz GA, Rai A, Epstein AM (1992). Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses in the medical literature: are the methods being used correctly?. Ann Intern Med, 116(3):238-44.
12. Saunders MN, Rojon C(2011). On the attributes of a critical literature review. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice,4(2):156-62, DOI: 10.1080/17521882.2011.596485
13. Mitton C, Adair CE, McKenzie E, Patten SB, Perry BW(2007). Knowledge transfer and exchange: review and synthesis of the literature. Milbank Q, 85(4):729-68.
14. Hoque ME, Khan JA, Hossain SS, et al (2011). A systematic review of economic evaluations of health and health-related interventions in Bangladesh. Cost Eff Resour Alloc, 9(1):1-8.
15. Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, et al(2013). Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS)—explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR health economic evaluation publication guidelines good reporting practices task force. Value Health,16(2):231-50.
16. Mosadeghrad AM (2020). Rethinking Health reforms in Iran. Tehran Univ Med J, 78 (7) :473-474. [in Persian]
17. Riewpaiboon A (2014). Measurement of costs for health economic evaluation. J Med Assoc Thai, 97:S17-26.
18. Watson SI, Sahota H, Taylor CA, Chen Y-F, Lilford RJ (2018). Cost-effectiveness of health care service delivery interventions in low and middle income countries: a systematic review. Glob Health Res Policy, 3(1):17.
19. AlAujan SS, Almazrou SH, Al-Aqeel SA (2021). A Systematic Review of Sources of Outcomes and Cost Data Utilized in Economic Evaluation Research Conducted in the Gulf Cooperation Council. Risk Manag Healthc Policy,14:209.
20. Jefferson T, Demicheli V (1995). Are guidelines for peer‐reviewing economic evaluations necessary? A survey of current editorial practice. Health Econ, 4(5):383-8.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 51 No 10 (2022) | |
| Section | Review Article(s) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v51i10.10975 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Economic evaluation Cost-benefit analysis Cost-effectiveness analysis Cost-utility analysis | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
