Precautionary Allergen Labelling in Serbia: Market Audit and Consumers’ Perception

Dragana Davidovic; Maja Bulatovic; Katarina Paunovic; Nadja Vasiljevic; Danica Zaric; Dusan Popovic; Sanja Milenkovic

doi:10.18502/ijph.v51i3.8935

Precautionary Allergen Labelling in Serbia: Market Audit and Consumers’ Perception

Abstract

Background: Precautionary allergen labels (PAL) should be used to indicate the possibility of allergen presence in the food. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and types of precautionary labeling statements on different pre-packaged food products in retail stores in Belgrade, Serbia, as well as to assess consumers’ attitudes and behavior towards PAL statements.

Methods: This was a descriptive study. The following characteristics of 1404 pre-packaged foods were analyzed: prevalence of PAL, listed food allergens on PAL, and the types of the advisory terminology. In the group of 275 participants (94 with food allergies, and 181 persons who purchasing food for a household member with food allergy) reading practice of PAL, purchasing practice based on PAL, and the opinion about PAL statements credibility were evaluated.

Results: Overall, 33.9% of products had precautionary statements for one or more allergens. “Tree nuts” were the most common allergens listed in the PAL. The most common type of PAL was “May contain traces of x [allergen]” (52.7%). The PAL was always read by half of the participants. Less than half (43.3%) of the participants incorrectly believed that PAL is regulated by national law. A quarter of participants thought that the PAL statements are trustworthy.

Conclusion: PAL statements frequently are not user-friendly and are not providing sufficient protection for food allergic patients. To gain buyers’ confidence, protect health and provide security, the necessity for the strategies that would regulate PAL by the law exists.

1. Sicherer SH, Sampson HA (2018). Food al-lergy: A review and update on epidemiol-ogy, pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and management. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 141 (1): 41–58.
2. Greenhawt M (2016). Food allergy quality of life and living with food allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol, 16 (3): 284–90.
3. Gupta R, Holdford D, Bilaver L, et al (2013). The Economic Impact of Childhood Food Allergy in the United States. JAMA Pediatr, 167 (11): 1026–31.
4. Shah F, Shi A, Ashley J, et al (2019). Peanut Allergy: Characteristics and Approaches for Mitigation. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf, 18 (5): 1361–87.
5. National Academies of Sciences, Engineer-ing and Medicine (2017). Finding a path to safety in food allergy: assessment of the global bur-den, causes, prevention, management, and public policy. The National Academies Press. Washington, DC.
6. EC (European Commission) (2011). Regula-tion (EU) No 1169/2011 of the Europe-an parliament and of the council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers. Ofﬁcial Journal of the European Union L, 54 (304): 18e63.
7. Allen KJ, Turner PJ, Pawankar R, et al (2014). Precautionary labelling of foods for allergen content: are we ready for a global framework? World Allergy Organ J, 7(1):10.
8. Gendel SM (2012). Comparison of interna-tional food allergen labeling regulations. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 63 (2): 279–85.
9. DunnGalvin A, Roberts G, Regent L, et al (2019). Understanding how consumers with food allergies make decisions based on precautionary labelling. Clin Exp Aller-gy, 49 (11): 1446–1454.
10. Allen KJ, Taylor SL (2018). The Conse-quences of Precautionary Allergen Label-ing: Safe Haven or Unjustifiable Burden? J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, 6 (2): 400–407.
11. Zurzolo GA, Mathai ML, Koplin JJ, et al (2013). Precautionary allergen labelling following new labelling practice in Aus-tralia. J Paediatr Child Health, 49 (4): E306-10.
12. Skypala IJ, McKenzie R (2018). Nutritional Issues in Food Allergy. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol, 57 (2): 166–178.
13. Ford LS, Taylor SL, Pacenza R, et al (2010). Food allergen advisory labeling and product contamination with egg, milk, and peanut. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 126 (2): 384–5.
14. Spanjersberg M, Knulst A, Kruizinga A, et al (2010). Concentrations of undeclared al-lergens in food products can reach levels that are relevant for public health. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess, 27 (2): 169–74.
15. Soon JM (2018). Food allergen labelling: “May contain” evidence from Malaysia. Food Res Int, 108: 455–464.
16. Ben-Shoshan M, Sheth S, Harrington D, et al (2012). Effect of precautionary state-ments on the purchasing practices of Canadians directly and indirectly affected by food allergies. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 129 (5): 1401–4.
17. Marchisotto MJ, Harada L, Kamdar O, et al (2017). Food Allergen Labeling and Pur-chasing Habits in the United States and Canada. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, 5 (2): 345-351.
18. Turner PJ, Allen KJ, Mehr S, et al (2016). Knowledge, practice, and views on pre-cautionary allergen labeling for the man-agement of patients with IgE-mediated food allergy—a survey of Australasian and UK health care professionals. J Aller-gy Clin Immunol Pract, 4 (1): 165–7.
19. Battisti C, Chambefort A, Digaud O, et al (2017). Allergens labeling on French pro-cessed foods - an Oqali study. Food Sci Nutr, 5 (4): 881–888.
20. Pieretti MM, Chung D, Pacenza R, et al (2009). Audit of manufactured products: Use of allergen advisory labels and identi-fication of labeling ambiguities. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 124 (2): 337–41.
21. Mfueni E, Gama AP, Kabambe P, et al (2018). Food allergen labeling in develop-ing countries: Insights based on current allergen labeling practices in Malawi. Food Control, 84: 263–267.
22. FDA (Food and Drug Administration) (2004). Food Allergen Labeling and Con-sumer Protection Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-282, Title II). https://www.fda.gov/food/food-allergensgluten-free-guidance-documents-regulatory-information/food-allergen-labeling-and-consumer-protection-act-2004-falcpa
23. Liu A, Niyongira R (2017). Chinese con-sumers food purchasing behaviors and awareness of food safety. Food Control, 79: 185–191.
24. Soogali NB, Soon JM (2018). Food allergies and perceptions towards food allergen labelling in Mauritius. Food Control, 93: 144–149.
25. Connors M, Bisogni C, Sobal J, et al (2001). Managing values in personal food sys-tems. Appetite, 36 (3): 189–200.
26. Hefle SL, Furlong TJ, Niemann L, et al (2007). Consumer attitudes and risks as-sociated with packaged foods having ad-visory labeling regarding the presence of peanuts. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 120 (1): 171–6.
27. Warren CM, Dyer AA, Otto AK, et al (2017). Food Allergy–Related Risk-Taking and Management BehaviorsAmong Ado-lescents and Young Adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, 5 (2): 381–390.
28. Crotty MP, Taylor SL (2010). Risks associat-ed with foods having advisory milk label-ing. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 125 (4): 935–7.
29. Remington BC, Baumert JL, Marx DB, et al (2013). Quantitative risk assessment of foods containing peanut advisory label-ing. Food Chem Toxicol, 62: 179–87.
30. Barnett J, Vasileiou K, Gowland MH, et al (2013). Beyond Labelling: What Strategies Do Nut Allergic Individuals Employ to Make Food Choices? A Qualitative Study. PLoS ONE, 8 (1): e55293.

Files	XML PDF (1MB)
Issue	Vol 51 No 3 (2022)
Section	Original Article(s)
DOI	https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v51i3.8935
Keywords
Allergen labeling Precautionary allergen labeling Consumer attitudes Food safety

Rights and permissions
	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Davidovic D, Bulatovic M, Paunovic K, Vasiljevic N, Zaric D, Popovic D, Milenkovic S. Precautionary Allergen Labelling in Serbia: Market Audit and Consumers’ Perception. Iran J Public Health. 2022;51(3):587-595.

Vancouver

Download Citation