Response Comment on “Challenges and the Path Forward on Malaria Elimination Intervention: A Systematic Review”

  • Khandan SHAHANDEH Deputy of Research and Technology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Hamid Reza BASSERI Department of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

No Abstract

References

1. Smith V, Devane D, Begley CM, Clarke M (2001). Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol,11(1):15.
2. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med, 3(3): 6(7): e1000097.
3. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 339:b2700.
4. Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM et al (2015). The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med, 162(11):777-84.
5. Haber SL, Fairman KA, Sclar DA (2015). Principles in the Evaluation of Systematic Reviews. Pharmacotherapy, 35(11):1077-87.
6. Khan KS, Kunz R, Kleijnen J, Antes G (2003). Five steps to conducting a systematic review. J R Soc Med,96(3):118-21.
7. Petticrew M, Roberts H (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Blackwell Pub, 336 p.
8. Lockwood C, Oh EG (2017). Systematic reviews: Guidelines, tools and checklists for authors. Nurs Health Sci, 19(3):273-7.
9. McGrath TA, Alabousi M, Skidmore B et al (2017). Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review. Syst Rev, 6(1):194.
10. Hutton B, Moher D, Cameron C (2015).The PRISMA Extension Statement. Ann Intern Med, 163(7):566-7.
11. Higgins JPT, Altman DG (2008). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.0.0. Avaible: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-082008
12. Aromataris E, Pearson A (2014). The systematic review: an overview. Am J Nurs. 114(3):53-8.
13. Aromataris E, Riitano D (2014). Constructing a search strategy and searching for evidence. A guide to the literature search for a systematic review. Am J Nurs, 114(5):49-56.
14. Bellefontaine SP, Lee CM (2014). Between black and white: Examining grey literature in meta-analyses of psychological research. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23(8):1378-88.
15. Pappas C, Williams I (2011). Grey Literature: Its Emerging Importance. Journal of Hospital Librarianship, 11(3):228-34.
Published
2020-05-04
How to Cite
1.
SHAHANDEH K, BASSERI HR. Response Comment on “Challenges and the Path Forward on Malaria Elimination Intervention: A Systematic Review”. Iran J Public Health. 49(5):1019-1021.
Section
Letter to the Editor