Response Comment on “Challenges and the Path Forward on Malaria Elimination Intervention: A Systematic Review”
Abstract
No Abstract
1. Smith V, Devane D, Begley CM, Clarke M (2001). Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol,11(1):15.
2. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med, 3(3): 6(7): e1000097.
3. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 339:b2700.
4. Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM et al (2015). The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med, 162(11):777-84.
5. Haber SL, Fairman KA, Sclar DA (2015). Principles in the Evaluation of Systematic Reviews. Pharmacotherapy, 35(11):1077-87.
6. Khan KS, Kunz R, Kleijnen J, Antes G (2003). Five steps to conducting a systematic review. J R Soc Med,96(3):118-21.
7. Petticrew M, Roberts H (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Blackwell Pub, 336 p.
8. Lockwood C, Oh EG (2017). Systematic reviews: Guidelines, tools and checklists for authors. Nurs Health Sci, 19(3):273-7.
9. McGrath TA, Alabousi M, Skidmore B et al (2017). Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review. Syst Rev, 6(1):194.
10. Hutton B, Moher D, Cameron C (2015).The PRISMA Extension Statement. Ann Intern Med, 163(7):566-7.
11. Higgins JPT, Altman DG (2008). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.0.0. Avaible: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-082008
12. Aromataris E, Pearson A (2014). The systematic review: an overview. Am J Nurs. 114(3):53-8.
13. Aromataris E, Riitano D (2014). Constructing a search strategy and searching for evidence. A guide to the literature search for a systematic review. Am J Nurs, 114(5):49-56.
14. Bellefontaine SP, Lee CM (2014). Between black and white: Examining grey literature in meta-analyses of psychological research. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23(8):1378-88.
15. Pappas C, Williams I (2011). Grey Literature: Its Emerging Importance. Journal of Hospital Librarianship, 11(3):228-34.
2. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med, 3(3): 6(7): e1000097.
3. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 339:b2700.
4. Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM et al (2015). The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med, 162(11):777-84.
5. Haber SL, Fairman KA, Sclar DA (2015). Principles in the Evaluation of Systematic Reviews. Pharmacotherapy, 35(11):1077-87.
6. Khan KS, Kunz R, Kleijnen J, Antes G (2003). Five steps to conducting a systematic review. J R Soc Med,96(3):118-21.
7. Petticrew M, Roberts H (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Blackwell Pub, 336 p.
8. Lockwood C, Oh EG (2017). Systematic reviews: Guidelines, tools and checklists for authors. Nurs Health Sci, 19(3):273-7.
9. McGrath TA, Alabousi M, Skidmore B et al (2017). Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review. Syst Rev, 6(1):194.
10. Hutton B, Moher D, Cameron C (2015).The PRISMA Extension Statement. Ann Intern Med, 163(7):566-7.
11. Higgins JPT, Altman DG (2008). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.0.0. Avaible: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-082008
12. Aromataris E, Pearson A (2014). The systematic review: an overview. Am J Nurs. 114(3):53-8.
13. Aromataris E, Riitano D (2014). Constructing a search strategy and searching for evidence. A guide to the literature search for a systematic review. Am J Nurs, 114(5):49-56.
14. Bellefontaine SP, Lee CM (2014). Between black and white: Examining grey literature in meta-analyses of psychological research. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23(8):1378-88.
15. Pappas C, Williams I (2011). Grey Literature: Its Emerging Importance. Journal of Hospital Librarianship, 11(3):228-34.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 49 No 5 (2020) | |
| Section | Letter to the Editor | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v49i5.3229 | |
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
How to Cite
1.
SHAHANDEH K, BASSERI HR. Response Comment on “Challenges and the Path Forward on Malaria Elimination Intervention: A Systematic Review”. Iran J Public Health. 2020;49(5):1019-1021.
