Letter to the Editor

The Advantages of Waist to Height Ratio over the Commonly Used Anthropometric Measurements in Preadolescents and Adolescents: A Case Study from Montenegro

Abstract

Abstracts  Abstracts Abstracts  Abstracts

1. Wang Y, Lobstein T (2006). Worldwide trends in childhood overweight and obe-sity. Int J Pediatr Obes, 1 (1): 11–25.
2. Weber DR, Leonard MB, Zemel BS (2012). Body composition analysis in the pediat-ric population. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev, 10 (1): 130–139.
3. Sharma AK, Metzger DL, Daymont C, Hadjiyannakis S, Rodd CJ (2015). LMS tables for waist-circumference and waist-height ratio Z-scores in children aged 5–19 y in NHANES III: association with cardio-metabolic risks. Pediatr Res, 78 (6): 723–729.
4. Slaughter MH, Lohman TG, Boileau RA, Horswill CA, Stillman RJ, Van Loan MD, Bemben DA (1988). Skinfold equations for estimation of body fatness in children and youth. Hum Biol, 60 (5): 709–723.
5. Schröder H, Ribas L, Koebnick C, et al (2014). Prevalence of abdominal obesity in Spanish children and adolescents. Do we need waist circumference measure-ments in pediatric practice? PLoS One, 9 (1): e87549.
Files
IssueVol 48 No 12 (2019) QRcode
SectionLetter to the Editor
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v48i12.3565
Keywords
Keywords Keyword sKeywords Keywords Keywords

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
MILASINOVIC R, CVOROVIC A, KUKIC F. The Advantages of Waist to Height Ratio over the Commonly Used Anthropometric Measurements in Preadolescents and Adolescents: A Case Study from Montenegro. Iran J Public Health. 2019;48(12):2299-2300.