Original Article

Parameter Evaluation and Application Demonstration of a New Type of Blood Vacuum Tube Cap Opening and Closing Machine


Background: We aimed to evaluate the basic performance and basic parameters of a new type of blood vacuum tube cap opening and closing machine for further application.

Methods: From July 2013 to March 2018, 110, 000 cases involved in the clinical trials in Third People's Hospital of Dongguan City were selected as the instrument group, and 10,000 cases were selected as the manual operation group. The application demonstration and instrument performance assessment were performed by five units. Unified evaluation indicatory system and the standard of assessment were set up. The instrument assessments and demonstration tests were carried out by these 5 units. Finally, the basic parameters of the instrument were analyzed and compared.

Results: The new instrument had excellent performance, and thirty parameters were excellent. Five patents had been granted already. There were no differences between the instrument groups in different units, and among different units. However, there were some differences in the manual operation group between different units. The average cap opening time was 21 "04 in the instrument group, and 152" 48 in the manual operation group (P<0.05); the cap closing time was 18 "56 in the instrument group, and 104"24 in the manual operation group (P<0.05). The instrument group outperformed the manual operation group in cap closing time, pollution rate, spill rate and failure rate (P<0.01). The design of the instrument was original.

Conclusion: This blood vacuum tube cap opening and closing machine can perform a wide variety of functions, and it is stable, intelligent and superior to manual operation. More efforts need to be made for the industrialization of this instrument.


1. Stevens VL, Patel AV, Feigelson HS, Rodri-guez C, Thun MJ, Calle EE (2007). Cryo-preservation of whole blood samples col-lected in the field for a large epidemiolog-ic study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 16(10): 2160-3.
2. Philip J, Kushwaha N, Chatterjee T, Mallhi RS (2015). Optimizing cord blood collec-tions: Assessing the role of maternal and neonatal factors. Asian J Transfus Sci, 9(2): 163-7.
3. Columbus RL, Palmer HJ (1991). The inte-grated blood-collection system as a vehi-cle into complete clinical laboratory au-tomation. Clin Chem, 37(9): 1548-56.
4. Woo JS, Pach D, Perez-Alvarez I, Tran MH (2019). Transcending gender: recognizing the impact of gender identity on blood collection. Transfusion, 59(7): 2481-2.
5. Smith JW, Gilcher RO (2006). The future of automated red blood cell collection. Transfus Apher Sci, 34(2): 219-226.
6. Cheng VCC, Wong SC, Wong SCY et al (2019). Reusable blood collection tube holders are implicated in nosocomial hepatitis C virus transmission. Infect Con-trol Hosp Epidemiol, 40(2): 252-3.
7. Lima-Oliveira G, Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Picheth G, Guidi GC (2015). Laboratory Diagnostics and Quality of Blood Collec-tion / Laboratorijska Dijagnostika I Kvalitet Uzimanja Uzoraka Krvi. J Med Bi-ochem, 34(3): 288-294.
8. Perovic E, Bakovic L, Valcic A (2010). Eval-uation of Ves-Matic Cube 200--an auto-mated system for the measurement of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Int J Lab Hematol, 32(1 pt 2): 88-94.
9. Reynolds BS, Boudet KG, Faucher MR, Germain C, Geffre A, Lefebvre HP (2007). Comparison of a new device for blood sampling in cats with a vacuum tube collection system - plasma biochem-istry, haematology and practical usage as-sessment. J Feline Med Surg, 9(5): 382-6.
10. Tsang DNC, Ip M, Chan PKS, Ching PTY, Lam HS, Seto WH (2019). Are re-usable blood collection tube holders the culprit for nosocomial hepatitis C virus transmission? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 40(2): 250-1.
11. Nayak SB, Kodimajalu S (2010). Progressive drawing: A novel “lid–opener” and “monotony–breaker”. Anat Sci Educ, 3(6): 326-9.
12. Manuel SP, Roberts JP, Bakhtary S (2019). Preoperative Autolo-gous Blood Collection in Adult Living Liver Donors: Are We Wasting Do-nor Blood and Increasing Exposure to Risk? Transplantation, 103(2): 387-91.
13. Agarwal S, Nguyen DT, Lew JD, Graviss EA (2019). Blood Collection Technique May Affect QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus Assay Results. Ann Am Thorac Soc, 16(2): 275-6.
14. Whitaker BI, Kamani N (2018). Surveys of blood collection and utilization. Trans-fusion, 58(2): 541-2.
15. Namba S, Ikeda F, Takaguchi K, Shimomura Y, Yasunaka T, Okada H (2018). A New Hepatitis Virus Test with Microliter-scale Finger-tip Blood Collection in Japan. Acta Med Okayama, 72(3): 283-287.
16. Faivre L, Couzin C, Boucher H, Domet T et al (2017). Associated factors of umbilical cord blood collection quality. Transfusion, 58(2): 520-31.
17. Tanaçan A, Yurdakul P, Aktoz F, Örgül G, Beksaç M, Beksaç MS (2018). Factors influencing the success of cord blood collection: a tertiary perinatal medicine center’s experience. Turk J Med Sci, 48(5): 961-6.
18. Miller GD, Cox HD, Nair V, Eichner D (2019). Anti-doping analytes in serum: A comparison of SST and SST-II Ad-vance blood collection tubes. Drug Test Anal, 11(7): 931-6.
IssueVol 48 No 9 (2019) QRcode
SectionOriginal Article(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v48i9.3018
Blood vacuum tube Parameter estimation Treatment

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
PU R, PU M, XIN Q, CHEN F. Parameter Evaluation and Application Demonstration of a New Type of Blood Vacuum Tube Cap Opening and Closing Machine. Iran J Public Health. 2019;48(9):1600-1606.