Original Article

Measuring the Efficiency of Health Systems: A Case of Mental Health in Middle East and North Africa Countries

Abstract

Background: Mental disorders and problems put a heavy burden on communities. Since resources allocated to the mental health systems are finite, it seems necessary to assess the efficiency of mental health systems. In this study, we assess the efficiency of mental health care systems across 12 Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries in 2014.

Methods: We used data envelopment analysis (DEA). The number of psychiatrists and nurses working in the mental health sector, the number of beds in mental hospitals, and the healthcare expenditures were included as inputs. The disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) of mental and substance use disorders was considered as the output. This approach is an input-oriented and a variable returns to scale.

Results: Countries such as Egypt, Iraq, Lebanon, and Qatar with the efficiency scores of 1.00 are entirely efficient. However, Bahrain and Iran with the efficiency scores of 0.50 and 0.58 are the most inefficient countries, respectively. After measuring the efficiency model, the radial super-efficiency showed that Egypt and Lebanon with the efficiency scores of 4.73 and 4.09 were ranked as the first and second by far. Qatar and Iraq compared with the previous analysis, and with the efficiency scores of 1.72 and 1.58, were ranked as the third and fourth. Bahrain and Iran were as inefficient as the previous model.

Conclusion: This study depicted a general portrait of the performance of mental health systems across MENA countries. Countries performed efficiently, have taken advantage of comprehensive programs in mental health sector. Countries are strongly recommended to complement their datasets of mental health to make future studies able to evaluate mental health systems more accurately and perfectly.

1. Bhugra D (2016). Mental health for nations. Int Rev Psychiatry, 28(4), 342-74.
2. Department of Health (1999). The National Service Framework for Mental Health. Modern Standards and Service Models. Department of Health, London. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/198051/National_Service_Framework_for_Mental_Health.pdf
3. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2012). Sick on the job?: myths and realities about mental health and work. OECD Publishing, Paris.
4. Vigo D, Thornicroft G, Atun R (2016). Estimating the true global burden of mental illness. Lancet Psychiatry, 3(2), 171-8.
5. World Health Organization (2017). Depression and other common mental disorders: global health estimates. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/254610/WHO-MSD-MER-2017.2-eng.pdf
6. Horton R (2007). Launching a new movement for mental health. Lancet, 370(9590):806.
7. World Health Organisation (2014). Mental health Atlas 2014. Available from: https://www.who.int/mental_health/evidence/atlas/mental_health_atlas_2014/en/
8. World Health Organisation (2011). Mental health Atlas 2011. Available from. https://www.who.int/mental_health/publications/mental_health_atlas_2011/en/
9. Sassi F (2010). Obesity and the Economics of Prevention: Fit not Fat. Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar Publishing. doi: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849808620
10. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2010). Improving value in Health Care: measuring quality. OECD Publishing, Paris.
11. Armesto SG, Medeiros H, Wei L (2008). Information Availability for Measuring and Comparing Quality of Mental Health Care Across OECD Countries. OECD Health Technical Papers, OECD Publishing, Paris, No. 20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1787/237827772222
12. Kontodimopoulos N, Bellali T, Labiris G, et al (2006). Investigating Sources of Inefficiency in Residential Mental Health Facilities. J Med Syst, 30(3):169-76.
13. Ozcan YA, Merwin E, Lee K, Morrissey JP (2005). Benchmarking using DEA: the case of mental health organizations. Operations research and health care, Springer, Boston, Massachusetts, pp. 169-189.
14. Schinnar AP, Kamis-Gould E, Delucia N, et al (1990). Organizational determinants of efficiency and effectiveness in mental health partial care programs. Health Serv Res, 25(2), 387–420.
15. Moran V, Jacobs R (2013). An international comparison of efficiency of inpatient mental health care systems. Health Policy, 112(1-2), 88-99.
16. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444.
17. Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2000). Data envelopment analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software. 22d ed. Springer US. New York.
18. Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci, 30(9), 1078-1092.
19. Papanicolas I, Smith P (2013). Health system performance comparison: an agenda for policy, information and research: an agenda for policy, information and research. McGraw-Hill Education, United Kingdom.
20. Kujawska J (2015). Measurement of healthcare system efficiency in OECD countries. Quantitative Methods in Economics, 16(2), 23-32.
21. Ozcan YA (2008). Health care benchmarking and performance evaluation: An Assessment using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Springer US. New York.
22. World Bank (2014). Current health expenditure (% of GDP). World Development Indicators. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.CHEX.GD.ZS
23. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) (2014). GBD Compare. Seattle, Washington. University of Washington. Available from: https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/
24. Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2006). Introduction to data envelopment analysis and its uses: with DEA-solver software and references. Springer US. New York.
25. Hollingsworth B, Smith P (2003). Use of ratios in data envelopment analysis. Applied Economics Letters, 10(11), 733-735.
26. Ozcan YA (2014). Evaluation of performance in health care. In: Health Care Benchmarking and Performance Evaluation. Springer, Boston, Massachusetts; pp. 3-14.
27. Andersen P, Petersen NC (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39(10), 1261-1264.
28. Zhu J (2009). Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking; Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets. Springer US. New York.
29. World Health Organization (2006). WHO-AIMS Report on Mental Health System in Egypt. WHO and Ministry of Health, Cairo, Egypt. Retrieved November, 1. Available from: https://www.who.int/mental_health/evidence/who_aims_report_egypt.pdf
30. Ministry of Public Health (2015). Mental Health and Substance Use- Prevention, Promotion, and Treatment- Situation Analysis and Strategy for Lebanon 2015-2020. Beirut, Lebanon. Available from: https://www.moph.gov.lb/userfiles/files/Mental Health and Substance Use Strategy for Lebanon 2015-2020-V1_1-English.pdf
31. Sharkey T (2017). Mental health strategy and impact evaluation in Qatar. BJPsych Int, 14(1), 18-21.
32. Ministry of Health (2014). Iraq National Health Policy 2014-2023. Baghdad, Iraq. Available from: http://staging.nationalplanningcycles.org/file-repository/IRQ
33. González E, Cárcaba A, Ventura J (2010). Value efficiency analysis of health systems: does public financing play a role? J Public Health, 18(4), 337-350.
Files
IssueVol 50 No 5 (2021) QRcode
SectionOriginal Article(s)
Published2021-04-30
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v50i5.6119
Keywords
Data envelopment analysis (DEA) Efficiency Mental health systems Health expenditures

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Safaei Lari M, Emamgholipour Sefiddashti S. Measuring the Efficiency of Health Systems: A Case of Mental Health in Middle East and North Africa Countries. Iran J Public Health. 50(5):1017-1027.