Self-Perception of Gerontoism according to Social Support and Family Functionality
Background: The gerontoism, a neologism adopted here, is a form of discrimination regarding age and can occur in rational, emotional, and behavioral contexts, and could be influenced by many factors. This study aimed to identify if the social support and the family functionality interfere in the self-perception of gerontoism.
Methods: Participants were 376 elderly in good physical and mental condition. They participated in the Group Living organization in the Municipality of Curitiba, State of Paraná, Brazil, in 2012. Information was collected about sociodemographic profile using a structured questionnaire. The social support, the family functionality, and the self-perception of gerontoism were defined by the Medical Outcomes Study, the Family APGAR index, and Ageism Survey, respectively. The variables were analyzed by Pearson’s correlation coefficient, One Way ANOVA, Tukey’s HSD test, and the Student’s t-test.
Results: Most of the participants came from small cities from the interior (48.7%), were female (94.4%), with age ranging 60-69 yr-old (45.5%), whites (76.1%), widowers (47.1%), with children (93.9%), with low schooling (55.3%), with family income from 1-2 minimum wage (31.4%), and retirees not working (44.1%). It was not observed correlation between sociodemographic variables and self-perception of gerontoism. Statistical significance was observed between self-perception of gerontoism and social support (r= -0.26, P=0.00), and between the self-perception and family functionality (r = -0.28, P=0.00). Once the scores of self-perception of gerontoism increased, the ones from social support and family functionality, decreased.
Conclusion: Lower self-perception of gerontoism was observed in elderly with higher social support and family functionality.
2. Cuddy AJC, Norton MI, Fiske ST (2005). This old stereotype: the pervasiveness and persistence of the elderly stereotype. Journal of Social Issues, 61(2): 267-85.
3. Nelson TD (2005). Ageism: prejudice against our feared future self. Journal of So-cial Issues, 61(2): 207-221.
4. North MS, Fiske ST (2012). An inconven-ienced youth? Ageism and its potential intergenerational roots. Psycholl Bull, 138(5): 982-97.
5. Palmore E. (2001). The ageism survey: first findings. Gerontologist, 41(5): 572-5.
6. Pinquart M (2002). Good news about the ef-fects of bad old-age stereotypes. Exp Ag-ing Res, 28(3): 317-36.
7. World Health Organization (2002). Active ageing: a policy framework. Geneva: WHO.
8. World Health Organization (2007). Global age-friendly cities: a guide. Geneva: WHO.
9. Cheraghi Z, Doosti-Irani A, Nedjat S, Cheraghi P, Nedjat S (2016). Quality of life in elderly Iranian population using the QOL-brief Questionnaire: a systematic review. Iran J Public Health, 45(8): 978-85.
10. Baptista MN (2005). Development of inventário de percepção de suporte familiar (IPSF): preliminary psychometrics studies. Psico-USF, 10(1): 11-19.
11. Alvarenga MRM, Oliveira MAC, Domingues MAR et al (2011). [Social support networks for elderly patients at-tended by Family Health teams]. Cien Saude Colet, 16(5): 2603-11.
12. Conte KP, Schure MB, Goins RT (2015). Correlates of social support in older American Indians: the Native Elder Care Study. Aging Ment Health, 19(9): 835-43.
13. Pillemer SC, Holtzer R (2016). The differen-tial relationships of dimensions of per-ceived social support with cognitive func-tion among older adults. Aging Ment Health, 20(7): 727-35.
14. Goldani AM (2010). “Ageism” in Brazil: What is it? Who does it? What to do with it? Rev Bras Estud Popul, 27(2): 385-405.
15. Han J, Richardson VE (2015). The relation-ships among perceived discrimination, self-perceptions of aging, and depressive symptoms: a longitudinal examination of age discrimination. Aging Ment Health, 19(8): 747-55.
16. Butler RN (1969). Age-ism: another form of bigotry. Gerontologist, 9(4): 243-6.
17. Ferreira-Alves J, Novo RF (2006). Avaliação da discriminação social de pessoas idosas em Portugal. Int J Clin Health Psychol, 6(1): 65-77.
18. Palmore E (2004). Research note: ageism in Canada and the United States. J Cross-Cult Gerontol, 19(1): 41-6.
19. Russel-Miller M, Fields EE (2009). Ageism: confronting its effects on services. In National Organization for Human Ser-vices. NHOS National Conference Pro-ceedings. People in contexts: families, schools, community, and cultures. Portland: Oregon. pp. 40-4.
20. Crawley L (2005). What is ageism? In McGivern, Y. (Ed.), From ageism to age equality: addressing the challenges: Conference Pro-ceedings. Dublin: National Council on Age-ing and Older People. pp. 12-5.
21. Brazil. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (2010). Synthesis of social indicators: an analysis of the living conditions of the popula-tion: 2010. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.
22. Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL (1991). The MOS social support survey. Soc Sci Med, 32(6): 705-14.
23. Griep HR, Chor D, Faerstein E et al (2005). Construct validity of the Medical Outcomes Study’s social support scale adapted to Portuguese in the Pró-Saúde Study. Cad Saude Publica, 21(3): 703-14.
24. Smilkstein G (1978). The family APGAR a proposal for a family function test and its use by physicians. J Fam Pract, 6(6): 1231-9.
25. Duarte YAO. Família: Rede de suporte ou fator estressor: a ótica de idosos e cuidadores familiares [PhD thesis]. Escola de Enfermagem/USP, São Paulo; 2001.
26. Couto MCPP, Koller SH, Novo RF, Soares PS (2009). An assessment of the discrimination against older persons in the brazilian context: ageism. Psic: Teor e Pesq, 25(4): 509-18.
27. Levy B, Banaji MR (2002). Implicit ageism. In: Nelson T (Ed.), Ageism – Stereotyping and prejudice against older persons. Cambridge: Bradford Books. pp. 49-75.
28. Chor D, Griep RH, Lopes CS, Faerstein E (2001). [Social network and social support measures from the Pró-Saúde Study: pre-tests and pilot study]. Cad Saude Publica, 17(4): 887-96.
29. Gonçalves LHT, Costa MAM, Martins MM et al (2011). The family dynamics of elder elderly in the context of Porto, Portugal. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem, 19(3): 458-66.
30. Chan N, Anstey KJ, Windsor TD, Luszcz MA (2011). Disability and depressive symptoms in later life: the stress-buffering role on informal and formal support. Gerontology, 57(2): 180-9.
31. Fernández-Mayoralas G, Rojo-Pérez F, Mar-tínez-Martín P et al (2015). Active ageing and quality of life: factors associated with participation in leisure activities among institutionalized older adults, with and without dementia. Aging Ment Health, 19(11): 1031-41.
|Issue||Vol 48 No 4 (2019)|
|Elderly Family functionality Prejudice Social support|
|Rights and permissions|
|This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|