Letter to the Editor

Infertility Related Quality of Life and Self-Efficacy among Infertile Couples: A Dyadic Approach

1. Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, et al (2007). International estimates of infertility preva-lence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod, 22(6):1506-12.
2. Schmidt L (2009). Social and psychological consequences of infertility and assisted reproduction–what are the research pri-orities? Hum Fertil (Camb), 12(1):14-20.
3. Maroufizadeh S, Ghaheri A, Omani Samani R (2017). Factors associated with poor quality of life among Iranian infertile women undergoing IVF. Psychol Health Med, 22(2):145-151.
4. Wickham RE, Macia KS (2019). Examining cross-level effects in dyadic analysis: A structural equation modeling perspective. Behav Res Methods, 51(6):2629-2645.
5. Maroufizadeh S, Ghaheri A, Amini P, et al (2017). Psychometric properties of the fertility quality of life instrument in infer-tile Iranian women. Int J Fertil Steril, 10(4):371-379.
6. Cousineau TM, Green TC, Corsini EA, et al (2006). Development and validation of the Infertility Self-Efficacy scale. Fertil Steril, 85(6):1684-96.
7. Peterson BD, Newton CR, Rosen KH (2003). Examining congruence between partners' perceived infertility‐related stress and its relationship to marital adjustment and depression in infertile couples. Fam Process, 42(1):59-70.
8. Maroufizadeh S, Hosseini M, Rahimi Foroushani A, et al (2018). Application of the dyadic data analysis in behavioral medicine research: marital satisfaction and anxiety in infertile couples. BMC Med Res Methodol, 18(1):117.
IssueVol 50 No 5 (2021) QRcode
SectionLetter to the Editor
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v50i5.6132

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Maroufizadeh S, Omani-Samani R, Hosseini M. Infertility Related Quality of Life and Self-Efficacy among Infertile Couples: A Dyadic Approach. Iran J Public Health. 2021;50(5):1085-1087.