The Necessities for the Transparent Peer-Review
Abstract
No Abstract.
1. Polka KK, Kiley R, Konforti B, Stern B, Vale RD (2018). Publish peer reviews. Nature, 560: 545-547.
2. Cosgrove A, Flintoft L (2017). Trialing transparent peer review. Genome Biol, 18: 173.
3. Casado M (2018). Junior reviewers jump in-to the pool. Nature, 560: 307.
4. Palombo E (2017). Gender bias: strategy to balance reviewers. Nature, 543: 40.
5. Faggion Jr CM (2016). Improving the peer-review process from the perspective of an author and reviewer. Br Dent J, 220: 167-168.
2. Cosgrove A, Flintoft L (2017). Trialing transparent peer review. Genome Biol, 18: 173.
3. Casado M (2018). Junior reviewers jump in-to the pool. Nature, 560: 307.
4. Palombo E (2017). Gender bias: strategy to balance reviewers. Nature, 543: 40.
5. Faggion Jr CM (2016). Improving the peer-review process from the perspective of an author and reviewer. Br Dent J, 220: 167-168.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 50 No 4 (2021) | |
| Section | Letter to the Editor | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v50i4.6010 | |
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
How to Cite
1.
Lee JH, Jeon JH, Park KS, Kim TY, Kim JH, Lee SH. The Necessities for the Transparent Peer-Review. Iran J Public Health. 2021;50(4):831-832.
