Percent Body Fat Cut-Off Points for Diagnosing Metabolic Syndrome in Korean Adolescents
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to identify percent body fat cut-off points related to metabolic syndrome in a large sample of Korean adolescents.
Methods: The subjects (n=2120; boys=1107, girls=1013) were middle and high school students aged 12–17 yr who participated in the Korean National Fitness Award Project in 2013. Percent body fat was estimated via eight-polar bioelectrical impedance analysis. Metabolic syndrome was classified using established standards based on the National Cholesterol Education Program with the definition modified for age. Age- and sex-specific percent body fat z-scores were calculated for every adolescent using skewness, median, and coefficient of variation curves to account for growth and development. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to identify the percent body fat cut-off points using percent body fat z-scores from skewness, median, and coefficient of variation curves as the test and metabolic syndrome as the criterion.
Results: Based on the modified National Cholesterol Education Program criteria for metabolic syndrome, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for percent body fat were 0.882 and 0.893 for boys and girls, respectively. The percent body fat percentiles were 82.2 and 87.3 for boys and girls, respectively. According to the skewness, median, and coefficient of variation curves, the percent body fat cut-off points based on the modified National Cholesterol Education Program criteria were 23.6%-25.7% for boys and 32.8%-37.3% for girls, both aged 12-17 yr. Age- and sex-specific percent body fat cut-off points were identified in relation to the metabolic syndrome status of Korean adolescents.
Conclusion: These percent body fat cut-offs might be useful for identifying metabolic abnormality due to obesity in Korean adolescents.
2. Freedman D, Khan LK, Serdula MK, et al (2005). The relation of childhood BMI to adult adiposity: The Bogalusa Heart Study. Pediatrics, 115(1):22-27.
3. Whitaker RC, Wright JA, Pepe MS, et al (1997). Predicting obesity in young adult-hood from childhood and parental obe-sity. N Engl J Med, 337(13):869-873.
4. Kvaavik E, Tell GS, Klepp KI (2003). Pre-dictors and tracking of body mass index from adolescence into adulthood: follow-up of 18 to 20 years in the Oslo Youth Study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 157(12):1212-1218.
5. Daniels SR, Arnett DK, Eckel RH, et al (2005). Overweight in children and ado-lescents pathophysiology, consequences, prevention, and treatment. Circulation, 111(15):1999-2012.
6. National Institute of Health (1998). Clinical guidelines on the identification, evalua-tion, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. Obes Res, 6 Suppl 2:51S-209S.
7. Barlow SE (2007). Expert committee rec-ommendations regarding the prevention, assessment, and treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity: sum-mary report. Pediatrics, 120 Suppl 4:S164-S192.
8. Williams DP, Going SB, Lohman TG, et al (1992). Body fatness and risk for elevated blood pressure, total cholesterol, and se-rum lipoprotein ratios in children and adolescents. Am J Public Health, 82(3):358-363.
9. Laurson KR, Eisenmann JC, Welk GJ (2011). Body fat percentile curves for US children and adolescents. Am J Prev Med, 41(4 Suppl 2):S87-92.
10. Laurson KR, Eisenmann JC, Welk GJ (2011). Aerobic fitness percentiles for US adolescents. Am J Prev Med, 41(4 Suppl 2):S106-110.
11. Deurenberg P, Deurenberg‐Yap M, Guricci S (2002). Asians are different from Cau-casians and from each other in their body mass index/body fat per cent rela-tionship. Obes Rev, 3(3):141-146.
12. Lim JS, Hwang JS, Lee JA, et al (2009). Cross‐calibration of multi‐frequency bi-oelectrical impedance analysis with eight‐point tactile electrodes and dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry for assessment of body composition in healthy children aged 6–18 years. Pediatr Int, 51(2):263-268.
13. Heyward VH, Wagner DR (2004). Applied body composition assessment; Human Kinetics.
14. Cook S, Weitzman M, Auinger P, et al (2003). Prevalence of a metabolic syn-drome phenotype in adolescents: find-ings from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 157(8):821-827.
15. Ford ES, Li C (2008). Defining the metabol-ic syndrome in children and adolescents: will the real definition please stand up? J Pediatr, 152(2):160-164.
16. Moon JS, Lee SY, Nam CM, et al (2008). 2007 Korean National Growth Charts: review of developmental process and an outlook (in Korean). Korean J Pediatr, 51(1):1-25.
17. Park S, Song H-S, Ko B-G, et al (2013). Body composition and metabolic syn-drome in Korean Adolescents (in Kore-an). Korea Institute of Sport Science.
18. Obuchowski NA (2003). Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves and Their Use in Radiology. Radiology, 229(1):3-8.
19. World Health Organization (2000). Interna-tional association for the study of obesity and International obesity task force: The Asia-Pacific Perspective: redefining obesi-ty and its treatment. Health Communica-tions Australia: Melbourne.
20. Wadden TA, Stunkard AJ (2002). Handbook of obesity treatment. Guilford Press.
21. Zhu S, Wang Z, Shen W, et al (2003). Per-centage body fat ranges associated with metabolic syndrome risk: results based on the third National Health and Nutri-tion Examination Survey (1988–1994). Am J Clin Nutr, 78(2):228-235.
Files | ||
Issue | Vol 48 No 1 (2019) | |
Section | Original Article(s) | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v48i1.784 | |
Keywords | ||
Childhood obesity Adolescents Percent body fat standards |
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |