Letter to the Editor

What Is Needed for a Successful Second Chance for Accused Researchers?

Abstract

No Abstract.

1. Cyranoski D (2018). Sacked Japanese biolo-gist to retrain at Crick institute. Nature, 557: 288-289.
2. Fanelli D (2009). How many scientists fabri-cate and falsify research? A systematic re-view and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS One, 4: e5738.
3. Oldham JM (2015). The alternative DSM‐5 model for personality disorders. World Psychiatry, 14: 234-236.
4. Caminiti R (2018). University fought a researcher’s corner. Nature, 559: 32.
5. Abbott A (2018). Scientists criticize handling of animal-welfare charges. Nature, 558: 13-14.
6. Normile D (2014). The second act. Sci-ence, 343: 244-247.
Files
IssueVol 49 No 10 (2020) QRcode
SectionLetter to the Editor
Published2020-10-01
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v49i10.4707
PMCIDPMC7719657
PMID33346228

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
LEE JH, JEON JH, LEE SH. What Is Needed for a Successful Second Chance for Accused Researchers?. Iran J Public Health. 2020;49(10):2003-2005.