Affecting Structural Factors on the Entrepreneurship Behavior of the Academic Members of Healthcare

  • Rafat Mohebifar Department of Health Management, School of Health, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
  • Azad Shokri Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sci-ences, Sanandaj, Iran
  • Sima Rafiei Department of Health Management, School of Health, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
  • Negin Mohammadi Mail Radiation Oncology Research Center (RORC), Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Maria MOHAMMADI Office of Quality Improvement and Accreditation, Besat Hospital, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
  • Sima MIRZAEI MOGHADAM Department of Midwifery, Nursing and Midwifery School, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
structural factors, Entrepreneurship behavior, Academic members, Healthcare, Iran


Background: The study aimed to assess affecting structural factors on the entrepreneurship behavior of the academic members of healthcare in Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Central Iran.

Methods: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional study conducted among faculty members working in five faculties of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Iran in 2018. Data were collected using a three-part standard questionnaire including demographic characteristics, entrepreneurial behavior and structural factors questions. ANOVA and linear regression modeling were used in STATA software version 14.

Results: Of 270 academic staff who participated in the study, 204 (73%) completed the questionnaire. The mean score reported for entrepreneurial behavior was 3.76±0.55 considered high tendency toward entrepreneurship. Moreover, the average conditions of the structural elements have been 2.51±0.89 considered average. Linear regression analysis showed that along with increasing age, entrepreneurship behavior increased (P=0.018, β=0.52), while an increase in educational level led to a decrease in entrepreneurship behaviour (P=0.001, β=-0.74). In a final model, organizational structure revealed a significant effect on entrepreneurship behavior (P<0.001, β=0.25). Only physical facilities didn't show a statistical significant effect on entrepreneurship score (P>0.05).

Conclusion: Universities must also pay attention to acquiring and developing the science and technology gained from academic research and transferring them through entrepreneurship channels. Considering the effect of structural elements on entrepreneurial behavior of the academic members, the need for such substructure in the universities and the country’s higher education organizations to assist development of entrepreneurial behavior among the academicians is greatly felt.


1. Grossmann V (2009). Entrepreneurial inno-vation and economic growth. J Macroecon, 31(4): 602-13.
2. Pogodaeva T, Zhaparova D, Efremova I (2015). Changing role of the university in innovation development: New challenges for Russian regions. Procedia Soc Behav Sci, 214(215): 359-367.
3. Krabel S, Siegel DS, Slavtchev V (2012). The internationalization of science and its in-fluence on academic entrepreneurship. J Technol Transf, 37(2): 192-212.
4. Audretsch DB (2014). From the entrepre-neurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. J Technol Transf, 39(3): 313-321.
5. Dangolani SK (2011). The effect of infor-mation technology in the entrepreneur-ship (A case study in golestan province IRAN). Procedia Soc Behav Sci, 30(2011): 10-2.
6. Martinelli A, Meyer M, Von Tunzelmann N (2008). Becoming an entrepreneurial uni-versity? A case study of knowledge ex-change relationships and faculty attitudes in a medium-sized, research-oriented uni-versity. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(3): 259-83.
7. Pearce II JA, Kramer TR, Robbins DK (1997). Effects of managers' entrepre-neurial behavior on subordinates. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(2): 147-160.
8. Chen CC, Greene PG, Crick A (1998). Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers? J Bus Ven-tur, 13(4): 295-316.
9. Slevin DP, Covin JG (1990). Juggling entre-preneurial style and organizational struc-ture. MIT Sloan Manag Rev, 31(2): 43.
10. Gird A, Bagraim JJ (2008). The theory of planned behaviour as predictor of entre-preneurial intent amongst final-year uni-versity students. South Afr J Psychol, 38(4): 711-24.
11. Philpott K, Dooley L, O'Reilly C, Lupton G (2011). The entrepreneurial university: Examining the underlying academic ten-sions. Technovation, 31(4): 161-170.
12. Lee JJ, Rhoads RA (2004). Faculty entrepre-neurialism and the challenge to under-graduate education at research universi-ties. Research in Higher Education, 45(7): 739-760.
13. Aghagani H (2004). The studying being or-ganic & mechanistic structure in Azad University. J Social & Humanly, 4(12): 31-53. [Persian]
14. Yadollahi FJ, Zali MR, Bagherifard SM (2011). Recognizing Affective Structural Factors on Developing Academic Entre-preneurship; The Case of University of Applied Science and Technology. J Sci Technol Policy, 4(1): 17-32.
15. Zampetakis LA, Moustakis V (2007). Entre-preneurial behaviour in the Greek public sector. IJEBR, 13(1): 19-38.
16. Pourshariat E, Hassan M, Mehrdad M (2017). Study of the Status of Structural Factors and Entrepreneurship at Army Universitie (Case Study: Shahid Satari Air Force Academy). JTMS, 3(7): 31-43. [Per-sian]
17. Yang P (2018). Understanding youth educa-tional mobilities in asia: A comparison of chinese ‘Foreign Talent’students in Sin-gapore and Indian MBBS Students in China. J Intercult Stud, 39(6): 722-738.
18. Lucey CR (2013). Medical education: part of the problem and part of the solution. JAMA Intern Med, 173(17): 1639-43.
19. Siadat SA, Rezazade SS (2012). Entrepre-neurship morale among students at Isfa-han University of Medical Sciences. Irani-an Journal of Medical Education, 12(7): 527-536.
20. Matsuno K, Mentzer JT, Özsomer A (2002). The effects of entrepreneurial proclivity and market orientation on business per-formance. Journal of Marketing, 66(3): 18-32.
21. Olsen JP (2008). The ups and downs of bu-reaucratic organization. Annu Rev Polit Sci, 11: 13-37.
22. Rasoul Rabbani SAH, Samaneh Shirazi (1389). Study of the level of entrepreneur-ship of the managers in the field of hu-man sciences in the Arak industrial or-ganizations. SDWP, 1(2): 11-30. [Persian]
23. Dyson RG (2004). Strategic development and SWOT analysis at the University of Warwick. European Journal of Operational Re-search, 152(3): 631-640.
24. Owston R, York D, Murtha S (2013). Stu-dent perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initia-tive. The Internet and Higher Education, 18: 38-46.
25. Salkhi S, Taghiashourib Mr, Fazli A (2014). The impact of knowledge sharing on en-trepreneurship in sport organizations. In-dian J Sci Res, 7(1): 955-8.
26. Borsekova K, Vaňová A, Vitálišová K (2017). Smart specialization for smart spatial development: Innovative strategies for building competitive advantages in tourism in Slovakia. Socioecon Plann Sci, 58: 39-50.
27. Bratnicki M (2005). Organizational entrepre-neurship: Theoretical background, some empirical tests, and directions for future research. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf, 15(1): 15-33.
28. Knight GA, Cavusgil ST (2004). Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2): 124-41.
29. Tohidi H, Jafari A, Afshar AA (2010). Stra-tegic planning in Iranian educational or-ganizations. Procedia Soc Behav Sci, 2(2): 3904-8.
30. Shane S (2004). Encouraging university en-trepreneurship? The effect of the Bayh-Dole Act on university patenting in the United States. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1): 127-151.
31. Kirby DA (2006). Creating entrepreneurial universities in the UK: Applying entre-preneurship theory to practice. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(5): 599-603.
32. Marques CS, Valente S, Lages M (2018). The influence of personal and organisational factors on entrepreneurship intention: An application in the health care sector. Jour-nal of Nursing Management, 26(6): 696-706.
33. Chee HL (2008). Ownership, control, and contention: challenges for the future of healthcare in Malaysia. Soc Sci Med, 66(10): 2145-56.
34. Shokri A, Akbari-Sari A, Bayat M, et al (2019). Estimate General Practitioners Active Supply in Iran: Capture-Recapture Method for Three Data Sources. Iran J Public Health, 48(12): 2240-2248.
35. Bayat M, Zalani GS, Harirchi I, et al (2018). Extent and nature of dual practice en-gagement among Iran medical specialists. Hum Resour Health, 16(1):61.
36. Zalani GS, Khalilnezhad R, Mirbahaeddin E, et al (2018). Human resources for health strategies: the way to achieve universal health coverage in the Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J, 24(9): 846-854.
37. Meyers AD, Pruthi S (2011). Academic en-trepreneurship, entrepreneurial universi-ties and biotechnology. Journal of Commer-cial Biotechnology, 17(4): 349-357.
38. Raadabadi M, Fayaz-Bakhsh A, Nazari A, et al (2014). Organizational entrepreneurship and administrators of hospitals: case study of Iran. Glob J Health Sci, 6(3): 249-55.
How to Cite
Mohebifar R, Shokri A, Rafiei S, Mohammadi N, MOHAMMADI M, MIRZAEI MOGHADAM S. Affecting Structural Factors on the Entrepreneurship Behavior of the Academic Members of Healthcare. Iran J Public Health. 49(9):1750-1757.
Original Article(s)