Applicability of the Smart Vision Screening Instrument among Chinese Primary School Students

  • Yaofei XIE School of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
  • Wenlong XU Wuhan Mumingleshi Health Science and Technology Co., Ltd, Wuhan, China
  • Lihua YANG Wuhan Youth Low-Eyesight Protection & Treatment Center, Wuhan, China
  • Wenwen WU School of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
  • Xiaodong TAN Mail School of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
Low eyesight, Schoolchildren, Validity, Vision screening


Background: A smart vision screening instrument was applied for screening low eyesight in primary school students in Wuhan, China. We aimed to compare the differences in test results between this instrument and lamp-box visual acuity charts, assess the validity of the screening results, and perform a preliminary comparison of the cost inputs of the two approaches.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study conducted in Wuhan, China in 2017, vision tests were performed on the same day among enrolled primary school students by using the two approaches. The t-test and kappa test were performed to compare the differences, and the indicators of validity were calculated and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn. Existing cost-input data were collected and the budget was analyzed.

Results: In total, 1001 schoolchildren were included, and the prevalence of low eyesight was 21.18% (95% CI: 18.71-23.87%). The test results of the two approaches were not statistically different (t=1.929, P>0.05) and showed moderate consistency (kappa=0.519, P<0.001). Sensitivity and specificity of the instrument were 84.90% (95% CI: 79.21-89.30%) and 91.63% (95% CI: 89.42-91.64%), respectively; positive predictive value was 73.17% (95% CI: 67.10-78.51%); and negative predictive value was 95.76% (95% CI: 94.00-97.04%). Area under the ROC curve was 0.883 (95% CI: 0.853-0.913) and significantly differed from 0.5 (P<0.001). The budget when using the instrument decreased 48.07% compared to that when using lamp-box visual acuity charts.

Conclusion: The test result of the instrument is reliable, and using it to conduct screening is cost-saving. Therefore, it might be popularized for vision monitoring in schoolchildren.


Pascolini D, Mariotti SP. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(5):614-8.

Mahayana IT, Indrawati SG, Pawiroranu S. The prevalence of uncorrected refractive error in urban, suburban, exurban and rural primary school children in Indonesian population. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017;10(11):1771-6.

WHO | Vision impairment and blindness.

Robinson B, Feng Y, Woods CA, Fonn D, Gold D, Gordon K. Prevalence of visual impairment and uncorrected refractive error - report from a Canadian urban population-based study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2013;20(3):123-30.

Williams KM, Verhoeven VJ, Cumberland P, Bertelsen G, Wolfram C, Buitendijk GH, et al. Prevalence of refractive error in Europe: the European Eye Epidemiology (E(3)) Consortium. European journal of epidemiology. 2015;30(4):305-15.

Ma Y, Qu X, Zhu X, Xu X, Zhu J, Sankaridurg P, et al. Age-Specific Prevalence of Visual Impairment and Refractive Error in Children Aged 3-10 Years in Shanghai, China. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2016;57(14):6188-96.

Varma R, Torres M, McKean-Cowdin R, Rong F, Hsu C, Jiang X, et al. Prevalence and Risk Factors for Refractive Error in Adult Chinese Americans: The Chinese American Eye Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;175:201-12.

Takeuchi H, Taki Y, Nouchi R, Yokoyama R, Kotozaki Y, Nakagawa S, et al. Refractive error is associated with intracranial volume. Scientific reports. 2018;8(1):175.

Hashemi H, Yekta A, Jafarzadehpur E, Ostadimoghaddam H, Asharlous A, Nabovati P, et al. Sensitivity and Specificity of Preschool Vision Screening in Iran. Iran J Public Health. 2017;46(2):207-15.

Wenzhou Medical University. Standard for logarithmic visuaI acuity charts. National standards of the People's Republic of China.(In Chinese)

Guangchun Li, Ningning Peng, Fangbiao Tao, Huilin Liu, Siqing Liu, Xuechu Chen, et al. Technical standard for physical examination for students. (In Chinese)

Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya'Ale D, Kocur I, Pararajasegaram R, Pokharel GP, et al. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(11):844-51.

Gordois A, Cutler H, Pezzullo L, Gordon K, Cruess A, Winyard S, et al. An estimation of the worldwide economic and health burden of visual impairment. Glob Public Health. 2012;7(5):465-81.

Muhammad N, Adamu MD. Making a difference with Vision 2020: The Right to Sight? Lessons from two states of North Western Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2014;17(6):723-8.

Cheng F, Shan L, Song W, Fan P, Yuan H. Distance- and near-visual impairment in rural Chinese adults in Kailu, Inner Mongolia. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016;94(4):407-13.

Wajuihian SO, Hansraj R. Refractive Error in a Sample of Black High School Children in South Africa. Optom Vis Sci. 2017;94(12):1145-52.

Basch CE. Vision and the achievement gap among urban minority youth. J Sch Health. 2011;81(10):599-605.

Hintermair M. Health-related quality of life and classroom participation of deaf and hard-of-hearing students in general schools. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2011;16(2):254-71.

Papadopoulos K, Metsiou K, Agaliotis I. Adaptive behavior of children and adolescents with visual impairments. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32(3):1086-96.

Thirumanickam A, Raghavendra P, Olsson C. Participation and social networks of school-age children with complex communication needs: a descriptive study. Augment Altern Commun. 2011;27(3):195-204.

Greguol M, Gobbi E, Carraro A. Physical activity practice, body image and visual impairment: a comparison between Brazilian and Italian children and adolescents. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35(1):21-6.

WHO | 12 October 2017: World Sight Day.

Marmamula S, Khanna RC, Mettla AL, Pehere NK, Keeffe JE, Yameneni DK, et al. Agreement and diagnostic accuracy of vision screening in children by teachers, community eye-health workers and vision technicians. Clin Exp Optom. 2017.

Kaur G, Koshy J, Thomas S, Kapoor H, Zachariah JG, Bedi S. Vision Screening of School Children by Teachers as a Community Based Strategy to Address the Challenges of Childhood Blindness. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(4):NC09-14.

Rewri P, Nagar CK, Gupta V. Vision Screening of Younger School Children by School Teachers: A Pilot Study in Udaipur City, Western India. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2016;11(2):198-203.

OstadiMoghaddam H, Fotouhi A, Hashemi H, Yekta A, Heravian J, Ghalandarabadi M, et al. Validity of vision screening tests by teachers among school children in Mashhad, Iran. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2012;19(3):166-71.

Thomson WD, Evans B. A new approach to vision screening in schools. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1999;19(3):196-209.

Saxena R, Vashist P, Tandon R, Pandey RM, Bhardawaj A, Menon V. Accuracy of visual assessment by school teachers in school eye screening program in delhi. Indian J Community Med. 2015;40(1):38-42.

Iwase A, Araie M, Tomidokoro A, Yamamoto T, Shimizu H, Kitazawa Y. Prevalence and causes of low vision and blindness in a Japanese adult population: the Tajimi Study. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(8):1354-62.

WHO | Data and maps.

Vijaya L, George R, Asokan R, Velumuri L, Ramesh SV. Prevalence and causes of low vision and blindness in an urban population: The Chennai Glaucoma Study. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014;62(4):477-81.

How to Cite
XIE Y, XU W, YANG L, WU W, TAN X. Applicability of the Smart Vision Screening Instrument among Chinese Primary School Students. Iran J Public Health. 50(1):111-120.
Original Article(s)