Effects of Smoking, Drinking, and Urban Environment on Obesi-ty in Seoul, Korea

  • Haejung CHUN Graduate School of Business Administration, Sangmyung University, 20 Hongjimun 2-gil, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea
Keywords: Urban environment;, Obesity;, Spatiotemporal autoregressive model;, Smoking;, Housing price


Background: The level of obesity is related to spatial characteristics around the individual. The objective of this study was to empirically analyze the effect of smoking, drinking, and urban environment on obesity in community residents.

Methods: This study was conducted for empirical analysis using Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) model not considering time or space-effects, Temporal Autoregressive (TAR) model considering time-effect only, Spatial Autoregressive (SAR) model considering space-model only, and STAR model considering both time and space effects. This study covered 25 autonomous districts in Seoul City, South Korea in terms of space and from 2009 to 2014 in terms of time.

Results: The STAR model yielded an adjusted R square higher than that from OLS, TAR, or SAR model. Empirical results from the STAR model showed significantly positive (+) effects of the ratio of dependent elders, ratio of smokers, ratio of drinkers, and areas of retail floor space on obesity. In contrast, effects of length of bicycle road and the amount of collected local tax on obesity were negative (-) with statistical significance.

Conclusion: Smoking and drinking rate and the length of bicycle road can contribute to personal obesity.


1. Olshansky SJ, Passaro DJ, et al (2005). A potential decline in life expectancy in the United States in the 21st century. N Engl J Med, 352(11):1138-45.
2. Poston WSC, Foreyt JP (1999). Obesity is an environmental issue. Atherosclerosis, 146(2):201-9.
3. Frank LD, Andresen MA, Schmid TL (2004). Obesity relationships with community design, physical activity, and time spent in cars. AM J Prev Med, 27(2):87-96..
4. Ewing R, Schmid T, Killingsworth R, Zlot A, Raudenbush S (2003) Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity, and morbidity. Am J Health Promot, 18(1):47-57.
5. Goldsby TU, Yeager V, Sen Bet al (2016). Impact Of Changing An Urban Environment On Pediatric Obesity Rates: Evidence From A Quasi-experiment. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 48(5S):664.
6. King DM, Jacobson SH. (2017). What is driving obesity? A review on the connections between obesity and motorized transportation. Curre Obes Rep, 6(1):3-9.
7. Dwicaksono A, Brissette I, Birkhead GS, Bozlak CT, Martin EG (2017). Evaluating the contribution of the built environment on obesity among New York State students. Health Edu Behav, 45(4):480-491.
8. Sallis JF, Conway TL, Cain KL, et al (2018). Neighborhood built environment and socioeconomic status in relation to physical activity, sedentary behavior, and weight status of adolescents. Prev Med, 110:47-54.
9. Redd SC (2002). Asthma in the United States: burden and current theories. Environ Health Perspect, 110(Suppl 4):557-60.
10. Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Black JB, Chen D (2003). Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation. Am J Public Health,93(9):1552-8.
11. Sturm R, Cohen DA (2004). Suburban sprawl and physical and mental health. Public Health, 118(7):488-96.
12. Kaczynski AT, Potwarka LR, Saelens BE (2008). Association of park size, distance, and features with physical activity in neighborhood parks. Am J Public Health, 98(8):1451-6.
13. Paquet C, Orschulok TP, Coffee NT, et al (2013). Are accessibility and characteristics of public open spaces associated with a better cardiometabolic health? Landsc Urban Plan, 118:70-8.
14. Giles-Corti B, Donovan RJ (2002). The relative influence of individual, social and physical environment determinants of physical activity. Soc Sci Med, 54(12):1793- 812.
15. Pikora T, Giles-Corti B, Bull F, Jamrozik K, Donovan R (2003). Developing a framework for assessment of the environmental determinants of walking and cycling. Soc Sci Med , 56(8):1693-703
16. Lee C, Moudon AV (2004). Physical activity and environment research in the health field: Implications for urban and transportation planning practice and research. CPL bibliography,19(2):147-81.
17. Moudon AV, Lee C, Cheadle AD, et al (2007). Attributes of environments supporting walking. Am J Health Promot, 21(5):448-59.
18. Dahlgren G, Whitehead M (1991). Policies and strategies to promote social equity in health. Stockholm: Institute for future studies.
19. Stokols D (1996). Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion. Am J Health Promot, 10(4):282-98.
20. Pace RK, Barry R, Sirmans C (1998). Spatial statistics and real estate. J Real Estate Financ, 17(1):5-13.
21. Ord K (1975). Estimation Methods for Models of Spatial Interaction. J Am Stat Assoc, 70(349):120-126.
How to Cite
CHUN H. Effects of Smoking, Drinking, and Urban Environment on Obesi-ty in Seoul, Korea. Iran J Public Health. 49(2):230-239.
National Report