<?xml version="1.0"?>
<Articles JournalTitle="Iranian Journal of Public Health">
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Iranian Journal of Public Health</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2251-6085</Issn>
      <Volume>42</Volume>
      <Issue>4</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2013</Year>
        <Month>04</Month>
        <Day>15</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Cost effectiveness of breast cancer screening using mammography; a systematic review</title>
    <FirstPage>347</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>357</LastPage>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Arash</FirstName>
        <LastName>Rashidian</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Dept. of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran ; Knowledge Utilization Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Eshagh</FirstName>
        <LastName>Barfar</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US"></affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Hamed</FirstName>
        <LastName>Hosseini</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US"></affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Shirin</FirstName>
        <LastName>Nosratnejad</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US"></affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Esmat</FirstName>
        <LastName>Barooti</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US"></affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2015</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>15</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Breast cancer is the leading cause of malignancy among women. Screening using mammography is proposed as an effective intervention for reducing early deaths due to breast cancer. We conducted a systematic review to assess the cost-effectiveness of such screening programs. We searched Medline, Scopus and Google Scholar and complemented it by other searches using sensitive search terms from 1993-2010. We screened the titles and abstracts, assessed the full texts of the remaining studies, and extracted data to a pre-designed data extraction sheet. Studies were categorized according to the age groups of the target population. We used narrative synthesis approaches for analyzing the data. Twenty-eight articles met the minimum inclusion criteria, mostly from high income settings. All studies used secondary data, and a variety of modeling techniques, age groups, screening intervals and outcome measures. Cost per life year gained, ranging from $1,634 (once at the age of 50 in India) to $65,000 (extending the lower age limit of screening to 40 Australian study), was the most commonly used outcome measure. Biennial screening test for those aged 50-70 years seems to be the most cost-effective option ($2685). Biennial screening for aged 50-70 years is the most cost-effective option among alternative scenarios. Screening those aged less than 50 is not recommended. Further studies in low-income and middle-income countries, and cost effectiveness studies along with randomized trials are required. To improve the comparability of the findings, future studies should include biennial screening in 50-70 age groups as an alternative strategy.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/view/4588</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/download/4588/4235</pdf_url>
  </Article>
</Articles>
