<?xml version="1.0"?>
<Articles JournalTitle="Iranian Journal of Public Health">
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Iranian Journal of Public Health</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2251-6085</Issn>
      <Volume>43</Volume>
      <Issue>9</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2014</Year>
        <Month>09</Month>
        <Day>15</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Adherence and Attrition in a Web-Based Lifestyle Intervention for People with Metabolic Syndrome</title>
    <FirstPage>1248</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>58</LastPage>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Leila</FirstName>
        <LastName>Jahangiry</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">1. Dept. of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences , Tabriz, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Davoud</FirstName>
        <LastName>Shojaeizadeh</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">2. Dept. of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Ali</FirstName>
        <LastName>Montazeri</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">3. Mental Health Research Group, Health Metrics Research Center, Iranian Institutesfor Health Sciences Research, ACECR , Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mahdi</FirstName>
        <LastName>Najafi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">4. Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Kazem</FirstName>
        <LastName>Mohammad</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">5. Dept. of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mehdi</FirstName>
        <LastName>Yaseri</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">5. Dept. of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2015</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>15</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">The aim of this study was to determine adherence and attrition rates in a lifestyle intervention for people with metabolic syndrome.Adherence and attrition data from a randomized controlled trial were collected. Participants were classified as adherence group if they completed assessments at 3 and 6 months follow-up and as attrition group if they did not. Physical activity and quality of life was measured using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) was used to explore predictors of attrition.The mean age of participants (n=160) was 44.1 years. Attrition rate in the intervention and control groups at first follow-up were the same (20%). However, the control group had significantly higher attrition rate (%33.7) compared to the intervention group (%20) at 6 months follow up. Results showed that low educated participants were more likely to not stay in the study than better educated participants (OR=2.95,CI:1.39-6.33,P=0.05). According with length of the study, attrition was decreased at six month (OR=0.66,CI:0.52-0.83,P&lt;0.001). Also, some aspects of health-related quality of life contributed to the attrition rate. Those who had higher scores on general health (OR=0.66,CI:0.54-0.97,P=0.023), social functioning (OR=0.44,CI:0.40-0.76,P=0.032), role emotional (OR=0.74,CI:0.54-0.98,P=0.18), vitality (OR=0.55,CI:0.38-0.90,P=0.015) and mental health (OR=0.63,CI:0.45-0.85,P=0.033) were more likely to stay in the study.It remains a concern that Web-based lifestyle programs may fail to reach those who need it most. Participant in the study generally had better quality of life than those who were lost to follow up.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/view/3928</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/download/3928/3589</pdf_url>
  </Article>
</Articles>
