<?xml version="1.0"?>
<Articles JournalTitle="Iranian Journal of Public Health">
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Iranian Journal of Public Health</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2251-6085</Issn>
      <Volume>54</Volume>
      <Issue>12</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2025</Year>
        <Month>12</Month>
        <Day>31</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Examination of the Publication Quality of Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses on Measles, Published Between 2009-2023 and Indexed in the PubMed Article Database</title>
    <FirstPage>2660</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>2669</LastPage>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>&#x15E;eyma</FirstName>
        <LastName>Kara</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Pursaklar District Health Directorate, Ministry of Health, Ankara, Turkey</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Banu</FirstName>
        <LastName>Cakir</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Division of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2025</Year>
        <Month>05</Month>
        <Day>01</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2025</Year>
        <Month>09</Month>
        <Day>30</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Background: Measles, a highly contagious, yet vaccine-preventable disease, is currently experiencing a notable resurge in numbers, in developing countries. With limited reading time, physicians often rely on structured summaries, and well-prepared abstracts can encourage them to read the full article, facilitating patient care. We aimed to examine the reporting quality of article abstracts about measles.
Methods: Indirectly/directly address measles and its vaccine, scrutinizing on systematic reviews and meta-analyses published from 2009 to the present, and indexed in the open-access PubMed article database. With the widespread use of abstract checklists like PRISMA-A in reading systematic reviews and meta-analyses, the message intended to be conveyed can be adequately delivered to the reader by abstracts only, respecting standard rules and requirements for reporting. We used a scoring system for compliance with PRISMA-A checklist in reading measles-related reviews published over the last 15 years.
Results: On average, the abstracts were &#x201C;very highly&#x201D; compliant with the expected reporting criteria: The year of publication (with 2020 as the timepoint) did not make any difference in reporting quality, but structured abstract were significantly more likely to convey their message in an &#x201C;expected&#x201D; manner, based on PRISMA-A criteria.
Conclusion: Using standard guidelines in evaluating reporting quality of different publications and emphasizing its importance for the writers and readers, alike, will be encouraging for improved presentation of original/filtered research results, with the goal of conveying valid and reliable health-related information, in a time-efficient way.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/view/38967</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/download/38967/8726</pdf_url>
  </Article>
</Articles>
