<?xml version="1.0"?>
<Articles JournalTitle="Iranian Journal of Public Health">
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Iranian Journal of Public Health</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2251-6085</Issn>
      <Volume>39</Volume>
      <Issue>2</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2010</Year>
        <Month>06</Month>
        <Day>15</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Metaplot: A Novel Stata Graph for Assessing Heterogeneity at a Glance</title>
    <FirstPage>102</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>104</LastPage>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>J</FirstName>
        <LastName>Poorolajal</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US"></affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>M</FirstName>
        <LastName>Mahmoodi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US"></affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>R</FirstName>
        <LastName>Majdzadeh</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US"></affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>A</FirstName>
        <LastName>Fotouhi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US"></affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2015</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>03</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Background: Heterogeneity is usually a major concern in meta-analysis. Although there are some statistical approaches for as&#xAD;sessing variability across studies, here we present a new approach to heterogeneity using "MetaPlot" that investigate the influ&#xAD;ence of a single study on the overall heterogeneity.
Methods: MetaPlot is a two-way (x, y) graph, which can be considered as a complementary graphical approach for testing hetero&#xAD;geneity. This method shows graphically as well as numerically the results of an influence analysis, in which Higgins' I2 statistic with 95% (Confidence interval) CI are computed omitting one study in each turn and then are plotted against recipro&#xAD;cal of standard error (1/SE) or "precision". In this graph, "1/SE" lies on x axis and "I2 results" lies on y axe.
Results: Having a first glance at MetaPlot, one can predict to what extent omission of a single study may influence the over&#xAD;all heterogeneity. The precision on x-axis enables us to distinguish the size of each trial. The graph describes I2 statistic with 95% CI graphically as well as numerically in one view for prompt comparison. It is possible to implement MetaPlot for meta-analysis of different types of outcome data and summary measures.
Conclusion: This method presents a simple graphical approach to identify an outlier and its effect on overall heterogeneity at a glance. We wish to suggest MetaPlot to Stata experts to prepare its module for the software.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/view/3123</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/download/3123/2922</pdf_url>
  </Article>
</Articles>
