<?xml version="1.0"?>
<Articles JournalTitle="Iranian Journal of Public Health">
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Iranian Journal of Public Health</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2251-6085</Issn>
      <Volume>51</Volume>
      <Issue>1</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2022</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <Day>03</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">The Effects of Cognitive-Based Interventions in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title>
    <FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>11</LastPage>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Sunweon</FirstName>
        <LastName>Yun</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Nursing, Mokpo National University, Jeollanamdo, Republic of Korea</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Seang</FirstName>
        <LastName>Ryu</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Nursing, Mokpo National University, Jeollanamdo, Republic of Korea</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2021</Year>
        <Month>03</Month>
        <Day>29</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2021</Year>
        <Month>04</Month>
        <Day>14</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Background: Cognitive-based intervention is divided into three types: Cognitive Stimulation (CS), Cognitive Training (CT), and Cognitive Rehabilitation (CR). This study was conducted to identify systematically the effects of cognitive-based interventions in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) applied to older adults in the following three groups: cognitively healthy, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia.
&#xD;

Methods: This search was carried out using the Ovid-MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, CINAHL, ProQuest, and Korea databases. The effectiveness of the intervention was verified using the CMA 2.0 program.
&#xD;

Results: A total of 54 RCTs were included in systematic reviews and 38 studies were analyzed by meta-analysis. Meta-analysis showed that cognitive-based interventions were effective in improving the cognitive function (SMD=0.39, 95% CI=0.32-0.44) of older adults. The subgroup analysis of cognitive function revealed that CT was the most effective in the cognitively healthy (SMD=0.40, 95% CI=0.33-0.46) and the MCI (SMD=0.45, 95% CI=0.27-0.63) groups, and CS was the most effective in the dementia group (SMD=0.57, 95% CI=0.43-0.70).
&#xD;

Conclusion: In order to improve the cognitive function of older adults in each group, the most effective intervention type needs to be considered first. Evidence on the appropriate type of Cognitive-based intervention will be helpful in nursing practice.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/view/24350</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/download/24350/7460</pdf_url>
  </Article>
</Articles>
