Tehran University of Medical Sciences Iranian Journal of Public Health 2251-6085 46 8 2017 07 17 1046 1053 Miguel Ángel GARCIA-GORDILLO Dept. of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain. AND Dept. of Applied Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain Daniel COLLADO-MATEO Faculty of Sports Sciences, University of Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain Pedro Rufino OLIVARES Instituto de Actividad Fisica y Salud, Universidad Autonoma de Chile, Talca, Chile AND Higher Institute of Physical Education, University of the Republic, Montevideo, Uruguay José Carmelo ADSUAR Dept. of Applied Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain AND Faculty of Sports Sciences, University of Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain Eugenio MERELLANO-NAVARRO Instituto de Actividad Fisica y Salud, Universidad Autonoma de Chile, Talca, Chile 2017 07 17 2017 07 17 Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of mortality characterized by progressive airflow obstruction and inflammation in the airways, which has an impact on health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-5L is one of the most used preference-based, health-related quality of life questionnaire. The objective of this study was to provide normative values of EQ-5D-5L for Spanish people suffering from COPD. Methods: Data were extracted from the Spanish National Health Survey (2011/2012). Overall, 1130 people with COPD participated in this survey. The utility index of EQ-5D-5L and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score were defined by gender, region, and age. Results: Mean (SD) EQ-5D-5L utility index and VAS score for Spanish people with COPD were 0.742 (0.309) and 60.466 (21.934) respectively. In general, men reported better health status than women. Ceiling effect of the whole sample was 30.35%. Conclusion: The current study provides normative values of EQ-5D-5L for Spanish people affected by COPD. Ceiling effect was high and better results were observed in men compared with women.     https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/view/10603 https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/download/10603/5250