Feed-forward Control Nursing Model in Expectant Treatment of Placenta Previa
AbstractBackground: We studied the possible advantages of feed-forward control nursing model in the treatment of placenta previa.Methods: We enrolled 60 pregnant women who were receiving treatment for expectant placenta previa between January 2010 and January 2016 and randomly divided them into the control group and the observation group with 30 cases in each group. In the control group, we offered specialist nursing which included examination, body positioning, vaginal bleeding record, psychological consultation and medication observation. Feed-forward control nursing was applied in the observation group which included establishing feed-forward control nursing improvement team, conducting quality control of nursing defects and putting forward ideas for improvements and verifying improvement outcomes.Results: The observation group got significantly higher success rate and lower complication rate compared with control group. Gestational age and fetal weights improved apparently in the observation group. When we compared the amount of postpartum bleeding and pregnancy bleeding in two groups we did not find any statistically significant difference (P>0.05). Patients’ satisfaction rate toward our nursing services was much higher in the observation group and the rate of nursing errors was significantly lower in this group. All differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion: Application of feed-forward control nursing model in the expectant treatment of placenta previa can improve treatment success rate, decrease complications and upgrade nursing quality.
Yu L, Hu KJ, Yang HX (2016). A retrospec-tive analysis on the pernicious placenta previa from 2008 to 2014. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi, 51:169-73.
Jaswal A, Manaktala U, Sharma JB (2006). Cervical cerclage in expectant manage-ment of placenta previa. Int J Gynaecol Ob-stet, 93:51-2.
Dietz P, Bombard J, Mulready-Ward C et al. (2014). Validation of self-reported mater-nal and infant health indicators in the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. Matern Child Health J, 18:2489-98.
Fairchild RM (2010). Practical ethical theory for nurses responding to complexity in care. Nurs Ethics, 17:353-62.
Jarvis LM (1999). A wait and see approach with marginal placenta praevia. Midwifery Today Int Midwife, (51):40-1.
Kayem G, Keita H (2014). Management of placenta previa and accreta. J Gynecol Ob-stet Biol Reprod (Paris), 43:1142-60.
Weeks A (2015). The prevention and treat-ment of postpartum haemorrhage: what do we know, and where do we go to next? BJOG, 122:202-10.
Sharma A, Suri V, Gupta I (2004). Tocolytic therapy in conservative management of symptomatic placenta previa. Int J Gy-naecol Obstet, 84:109-13.
Meyer NP, Ward GH, Chandraharan E (2012). Conservative approach to the management of morbidly adherent pla-centae. Ceylon Med J, 57:36-39.
Schminkey DL, Keeling AW (2015). Frontier nurse-midwives and antepartum emer-gencies, 1925 to 1939. J Midwifery Womens Health, 60:48-55.
Priest KC, Lobingier H, McCully N, Lom-bard J, Hansen M, Uchiyama M, Hagg DS (2016). Expanding Continuous Quali-ty Improvement Capacity in the Medical Intensive Care Unit: Prehealth Volunteers as a Solution. Qual Manag Health Care, 25:79-84.
Gaston T, Short N, Ralyea C, Casterline G (2016). Promoting Patient Safety: Results of a TeamSTEPPS® Initiative. J Nurs Adm, 46:201-17.
Austin JM, Pronovost PJ (2016). Improving performance on core processes of care. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol, 16(3):224-30.