An Ethical Review of Euthanasia and Physician-assisted Suicide

  • Božidar BANOVIĆ Faculty of Security Studies, University at Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Veljko TURANJANIN Faculty of Law, University at Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
  • Anđela MILORADOVIĆ Seniorenzentrum Röweland, Hamburg, Germany
Keywords: Active euthanasia, Passive euthanasia, Physician-assisted suicide, Ethics, Morality

Abstract

Background: In the majority of countries, active direct euthanasia is a forbidden way of the deprivation of the patients’ life, while its passive form is commonly accepted. This distinction between active and passive euthanasia has no justification, viewed through the prism of morality and ethics. Therefore, we focused on attention on the moral and ethical implications of the aforementioned medical procedures.Methods: Data were obtained from the Clinical Hospital Center in Kragujevac, collected during the first half of the 2015. The research included 88 physicians: 57 male physicians (representing 77% of the sample) and 31 female physicians (23% of the sample). Due to the nature, subject and hypothesis of the research, the authors used descriptive method and the method of the theoretical content analysis.Results: A slight majority of the physicians (56, 8%) believe that active euthanasia is ethically unacceptable, while 43, 2% is for another solution (35, 2% took a viewpoint that it is completely ethically acceptable, while the remaining 8% considered it ethically acceptable in certain cases). From the other side, 56, 8% of respondents answered negatively on the ethical acceptability of the physician-assisted suicide, while 33% of them opted for a completely ethic viewpoint of this procedure. Out of the remaining 10, 2% opted for the ethical acceptability in certain cases.Conclusion: Physicians in Serbia are divided on this issue, but a group that considers active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide as ethically unacceptable is a bit more numerous. 

References

Horn R (2013). Euthanasia and end-of-life practices in France and Germany. A comparative study. Med Health Care and Philos, 16: 197-209.

Paterson C (2008). Assisted Suicide and Eutha-nasia. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

Bogdanić M, Rakić J (2014). Euthanasia. Pravne Teme, (3): 218-224. (Serbian)

Emanuel EJ (1994). The history of euthana-sia debates in the United States and Brit-ain. Ann Intern Med, 121(10): 793-802.

Nicol J, Tiedemann M, Valiquet D (2013). Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide: Interna-tional Experiences. Publication no. 2011-67-E, Ottawa.

Bosshard G, Broeckaert B, Clark D, Mater-stvedt LJ, Gordijn B, Müller-Busch HC (2008). A Role for Doctors in Assisted Dying? An Analysis of Legal Regulations and Medical Professional Positions in Six European Countries. J Med Ethics, 34(1): 28-32.

Turanjanin V, Mihajlović B (2014). Right to die with dignity – the same problem and different legal approaches in European legislations, with special regard to Serbia. In: Human Rights between War and Peace, vol-ume II. Ed. M. Sitek, G. Dammacco, M. Wójcicka, Olsztyn, pp. 53-68.

Banović B, Turanjanin V (2014). Euthanasia: Murder or Not: A Comparative Ap-proach. Iran J Public Health, 43(10): 1316-1323.

Vidalis A, Dardavessis Th, Kaprinis G (1998). Euthanasia in Greece: Moral and ethical dilemmas. Aging (Milano), 10(2): 93-101.

Giglio F, Spagnolo AG (2014). Pediatric eu-thanasia in Belgium: some ethical consid-erations. J Med Pers, 12:146–149.

Turanjanin V (2013). Death with dignity in Belgium. In: XXI century – Century of Ser-vices and Service Law. Ed. M Mićović. Faculty of Law, University of Kragujevac, Serbia, pp. 223-237. (Serbian)

Rothschild A (2008). Just When You Thought the Euthanasia Debate Had Died. Bioethical Inquiry, 5:69–78.

Oduncu FS (2003). Euthanasia: Killing as Due Care?. Wien Med Wochenschr, 153: 387–391.

Müller-Busch HC, Oduncu FS, Woskanjan S, Klaschik E (2004). Attitudes on eutha-nasia, physician-assisted suicide and ter-minal sedation – A survey of the mem-bers of the German Association for Palli-ative Medicine. Med Health Care Philos, 7: 333–339.

Luban D (2007). Legal Ethics and Human Dig-nity. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Braswell M, McCarthy BR, McCarthy BJ (2008). Justice, Crime and Ethics. Newark: Anderson publishing.

Keown J (1995). Introduction. In: Euthanasia Examined: Ethical, clinical and legal perspectives. Ed. Keown J, Cambridge, pp. 1-5.

Ed. Arrigo B (2014). Encyclopedia of criminal jus-tice ethics. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Keown J (2004). Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Huxtable R (2007). Euthanasia, ethics and the law – from conflicts to compromise?. London-New York: Routledge.

Shuriye A (2011). Ethical and religious analy-sis on euthanasia. IIUM Engineering Journal, 12(5): 209-211.

Ncayiyana D (2012). Euthanasia – no dignity in death in the absence of an ethos of re-spect for human life. SAMJ, 102(6): 334.

Gormally A (1978). Prolongation of life: The principle of respect for human life. Linacre Centre Papers, 1: 1-28.

Singer P (1994). Rethinking Life and Death: The Collapse of Our Traditional Ethics. New York: The Text Publishing Company.

Ping-cheung L (2010). Euthanasia and As-sisted Suicide from Confucian Moral Per-spectives. Dao, 9: 53–77.

Varelius J (2013). Voluntary Euthanasia, Physician-Assisted Suicide, and the Right to do Wrong. HEC Forum, 25:229–243.

Girsh F (2004). Voluntary Euthanasia Should Be Legalized. In: Euthanasia – opposing viewpoints. Ed. Torr JD, San Diego, pp. 69-77.

Turanjanin V (2012). Moral inadmissibility differentiation of active and passive eu-thanasia. Pravni Život, 61(9): 509-522.

Harris J (1995). Euthanasia and the value of life. In: Euthanasia Examined: Ethical, clinical and legal perspectives. Ed. Keown J, Cam-bridge, pp. 6-22.

Sharpe JT (2011). Is there a significant moral distinction between active and passive eu-thanasia? Critique, 5: 11-16.

Moreland JP (1988). James Rachels and the Active and Passive Euthanasia Debate. JETS 31(01): 81-90.

Finnis J (1995). A philosophical case against euthanasia. In: Euthanasia Examined: Ethi-cal, clinical and legal perspectives. Ed. Keown J, Cambridge, pp. 23-35.

Harris J (1995). The philosophical case against the philosophical case against euthanasia –A reply to John Finnis. In: Euthanasia Examined: Ethical, clinical and legal perspectives. Ed. Keown J, Cambridge, pp. 36-45.

Kant I (2008). Groundwork for the Metaphysic of Morals. Belgrade: Dereta. (Serbian).

Velleman JD (1992). Against the right to die. J Med Philos, 17(6):665-81.

Williams G (1969). Euthanasia legislation: A rejoinder to the non-religious objections. In: Euthanasia and the Right to Death: The Case for Voluntary Euthanasia, Ed. Downing A, London, pp. 134-147.

Published
2017-02-12
How to Cite
1.
BANOVIĆ B, TURANJANIN V, MILORADOVIĆ A. An Ethical Review of Euthanasia and Physician-assisted Suicide. Iran J Public Health. 46(2):173-179.
Section
Original Article(s)